A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering ISO 42001 for Senior Technology Practitioners in Global Services
Build AI governance that teams adopt and auditors approve, from design to deployment
Who this is for
Senior Professional - II at the firm with deep technical delivery exposure across regulated sectors; likely involved in designing or reviewing AI governance artefacts for client engagements
Who this is not for
Entry-level analysts, non-technical executives, or practitioners outside of technology implementation and compliance delivery roles
What you walk away with
- Produce ISO 42001-compliant AI governance documentation that passes internal review on first submission
- Lead client-side governance discussions with structured control mappings and real-world precedents
- Design vendor evaluation criteria aligned with ISO 42001 control objectives
- Build reusable templates for AI risk assessments that scale across accounts
- Document clear statements of applicability that reflect actual deployment scope
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Defining artificial intelligence in the context of ISO 42001
- Core principles behind the standard’s governance model
- How ISO 42001 complements existing risk and compliance frameworks
- Mapping AI use cases to control applicability
- Understanding roles in AI governance: designer, deployer, user
- Scope boundaries for AI systems in client environments
- Differentiating ISO 42001 from ISO 27001 and ISO 9001
- Key terminology and definitions per clause 3
- Relationship between AI management and service delivery
- Global applicability and regional regulatory considerations
- How auditors interpret conformity claims
- Common misconceptions about certification readiness
- Identifying internal and external stakeholders in AI governance
- Creating a governance charter with clear accountabilities
- Establishing steering committee roles and responsibilities
- Defining AI system inventory thresholds
- Setting governance maturity targets by project type
- Linking governance initiation to procurement processes
- Documenting decision rights for high-risk AI use cases
- Planning governance activities across delivery phases
- Aligning with client-specific compliance requirements
- Using templates for initial governance onboarding
- Tracking governance initiation across engagements
- Integrating AI register setup into project kickoffs
- Identifying intrinsic risks in AI system design
- Assessing data quality and lineage risks
- Evaluating bias and fairness in model outputs
- Determining transparency and explainability thresholds
- Mapping identified risks to control objectives
- Using precedent-based mappings from past audits
- Documenting risk treatment plans per control
- Incorporating third-party model risks
- Setting monitoring frequency based on risk severity
- Linking controls to technical implementation steps
- Validating risk assessment completeness
- Producing audit-ready risk register entries
- Required records per clause 4 through clause 8
- Version control strategies for governance documents
- Storing records in multi-client environments
- Defining document ownership and access levels
- Creating standardized templates for AI registers
- Maintaining audit trails for model updates
- Documenting training data sourcing and ethics
- Recording human oversight mechanisms
- Handling documentation in agile delivery models
- Using metadata tagging for record categorization
- Automating document generation from workflows
- Ensuring retention policies align with client SLAs
- Assessing vendor compliance with ISO 42001
- Including governance criteria in RFPs and SIGs
- Evaluating third-party model risk documentation
- Setting expectations for model explainability
- Defining vendor responsibilities in SoA statements
- Managing subcontractor governance obligations
- Auditing vendor adherence to agreed controls
- Handling model updates from external providers
- Establishing escalation paths for governance issues
- Integrating vendor assessment into procurement
- Creating scorecards for ongoing vendor review
- Contracting for audit rights and access
- Planning internal audit cycles for AI systems
- Developing checklists based on clause requirements
- Sampling techniques for multi-account environments
- Assessing control effectiveness beyond documentation
- Using interviews to validate governance adoption
- Identifying gaps before external audit begins
- Tracking findings to resolution with evidence
- Creating audit simulation scenarios
- Preparing teams for auditor interviews
- Reviewing statements of applicability for accuracy
- Aligning internal findings with client feedback
- Reporting results to governance steering committees
- Determining control applicability per use case
- Justifying exclusions with documented rationale
- Aligning SoA scope with deployment boundaries
- Including human-in-the-loop considerations
- Addressing model lifecycle monitoring
- Documenting data provenance and quality controls
- Incorporating client-specific regulatory needs
- Referencing industry-specific precedents
- Versioning SoA across model iterations
- Using templates for faster SoA generation
- Validating SoA completeness with peer review
- Presenting SoA to client assurance teams
- Governance requirements for concept phase
- Control objectives during development and testing
- Pre-deployment review gates and approvals
- Monitoring model drift and performance decay
- Handling feedback loops from end users
- Updating documentation for model retraining
- Managing version control for AI models
- Defining decommissioning criteria and process
- Auditing historical model decisions
- Ensuring continuity during system handover
- Tracking changes to training data sources
- Maintaining governance records post-retirement
- Defining roles for human reviewers
- Setting thresholds for intervention
- Designing escalation paths for model errors
- Training staff on oversight responsibilities
- Documenting review frequency and criteria
- Using dashboards to support oversight
- Balancing automation with human judgment
- Ensuring diversity in oversight panels
- Capturing rationale for override decisions
- Auditing human intervention patterns
- Improving oversight based on incident reviews
- Integrating oversight into incident response
- Defining transparency levels per AI use case
- Documenting model decision logic for auditors
- Creating user-facing explanations
- Using SHAP and LIME for interpretability
- Managing trade-offs between accuracy and explainability
- Storing technical rationale for model outputs
- Providing access to explanation tools
- Training users on interpreting AI outputs
- Handling confidential model details
- Aligning explanations with client literacy
- Updating explanations after model changes
- Auditing explanation consistency over time
- Setting KPIs for AI governance effectiveness
- Monitoring model performance and fairness
- Collecting user feedback systematically
- Reviewing incidents to update governance
- Updating risk assessments after changes
- Scheduling periodic governance reviews
- Using automation to detect control drift
- Benchmarking against industry peers
- Reporting governance maturity to leadership
- Incorporating lessons from external audits
- Updating playbooks based on real events
- Planning for future revisions of ISO 42001
- Selecting certification bodies and auditors
- Scheduling stages of external audit
- Compiling documentation packages for auditors
- Preparing staff for interview sessions
- Responding to auditor findings
- Addressing non-conformities efficiently
- Demonstrating continuous improvement
- Leveraging certification in client proposals
- Maintaining certification through surveillance
- Renewing certification with updated evidence
- Sharing certification benefits across accounts
- Using certification status in competitive differentiation
How this maps to your situation
- Global services delivery complexity
- Client-facing compliance assurance
- Cross-functional implementation challenges
- Vendor and third-party governance
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 90 minutes per module, designed for flexible completion over weekends or focused work blocks.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic AI ethics guides, this course provides actionable, ISO 42001-aligned templates and real-world precedent mappings specifically for technology practitioners in global services firms.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.