A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering ISO 42001 for Senior Product Owners in Enterprise Technology
Build AI governance expertise that earns peer authority and shapes cross-functional roadmap decisions
The situation this course is for
Teams waste cycles reworking AI features because governance wasn't aligned early. Product owners lose influence when they can't speak the language of controls and audits. The result: delayed launches, strained cross-team relationships, and missed opportunities to lead.
Who this is for
Senior Product Owner in enterprise tech, leading AI or data-intensive features and needing to align engineering, compliance, and leadership stakeholders
Who this is not for
Entry-level product managers, non-technical stakeholders, or teams not actively shipping AI-enabled features
What you walk away with
- Produce AI governance documentation that aligns engineering and compliance teams on first review
- Lead roadmap conversations with confidence using ISO 42001 control language
- Anticipate audit and risk review requirements before they become blockers
- Position yourself as the internal reference for AI governance decisions across product and engineering
- Ship AI-powered features faster by embedding governance into product sprints
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Defining AI governance in the context of international standards
- Overview of ISO 42001 scope and structure
- How ISO 42001 complements existing internal governance models
- Differences between AI ethics, bias mitigation, and formalized control frameworks
- Mapping ISO 42001 to product lifecycle stages
- Understanding the role of product leadership in governance adoption
- Key stakeholders influenced by ISO 42001 implementation
- How ISO 42001 reduces friction in cross-functional approvals
- Common misconceptions about AI governance standards
- Preparing for internal questions about certification readiness
- How ISO 42001 supports scalable AI deployment
- Relating ISO 42001 to broader digital trust initiatives
- Defining AI systems based on functionality and decision impact
- Cataloging AI-powered features in current product roadmaps
- Assessing autonomy and influence levels of AI components
- Determining system boundaries for governance inclusion
- Working with engineering to identify training data sources
- Classifying systems by risk level under ISO 42001 guidelines
- Documenting AI system purpose and intended use cases
- Identifying third-party AI dependencies
- Mapping AI components to user interaction points
- Creating an inventory of AI systems for internal audit
- Prioritizing systems for governance rollout
- Integrating classification into sprint planning
- Defining the product owner's role in AI governance
- Mapping RACI for AI system approvals
- Engaging legal and compliance early in feature design
- Setting expectations with engineering leads
- Integrating governance roles into product team structure
- Documenting escalation paths for control conflicts
- Establishing cross-functional governance committees
- Assigning oversight for ongoing monitoring
- Clarifying responsibilities for model updates
- Handling ownership across shared platforms
- Managing vendor-supplied AI components
- Communicating governance roles to stakeholders
- Writing system purpose statements aligned with business goals
- Defining operational domains and constraints
- Mapping data flows in and out of AI components
- Documenting user roles and access levels
- Identifying integration points with non-AI systems
- Establishing performance expectations and limits
- Recording assumptions about model behavior
- Maintaining system context documentation over time
- Linking system context to control objectives
- Using diagrams to clarify system boundaries
- Versioning system context documentation
- Sharing context with audit and compliance teams
- Understanding risk types in AI systems
- Developing a risk taxonomy for product teams
- Identifying potential harms to users and business
- Assessing bias and fairness risks in training data
- Evaluating model transparency and explainability
- Considering safety and security implications
- Scoring risks based on likelihood and impact
- Documenting risk treatment plans
- Involving diverse stakeholders in risk review
- Integrating risk assessment into product backlog
- Updating assessments after model changes
- Reporting risk status to leadership
- Defining transparency goals for different user types
- Communicating model limitations to end users
- Providing meaningful explanations for AI outputs
- Designing user-facing model cards
- Creating internal model documentation for auditors
- Documenting training data provenance and quality
- Recording model development choices
- Explaining feature importance and decision logic
- Supporting user requests for AI decision rationale
- Balancing transparency with IP protection
- Integrating explainability into product design
- Testing explainability with real users
- Defining when human review is required
- Designing human-in-the-loop decision points
- Setting thresholds for automated vs manual action
- Training staff to monitor AI outputs
- Creating escalation procedures for anomalies
- Documenting human oversight responsibilities
- Designing user override capabilities
- Monitoring intervention frequency and trends
- Evaluating effectiveness of human control
- Updating oversight based on performance data
- Integrating oversight into incident response
- Reporting human control metrics to leadership
- Establishing data provenance and lineage
- Documenting data collection methods
- Ensuring data quality and representativeness
- Managing data privacy and consent
- Tracking model versions and changes
- Defining model validation and testing standards
- Documenting model performance over time
- Planning for model retraining
- Handling model drift detection
- Establishing criteria for model retirement
- Archiving models and data securely
- Auditing model lifecycle decisions
- Defining robustness requirements for AI components
- Testing model resilience to edge cases
- Protecting against adversarial attacks
- Monitoring for data poisoning risks
- Implementing input validation
- Establishing fail-safe behaviors
- Documenting security controls
- Integrating with existing security infrastructure
- Responding to AI-specific security incidents
- Updating models after security findings
- Sharing security practices with customers
- Auditing robustness controls
- Conducting privacy impact assessments
- Minimizing data collection and retention
- Implementing data anonymization techniques
- Detecting and mitigating bias
- Testing for disparate impact
- Involving diverse teams in fairness review
- Documenting fairness mitigation actions
- Providing user control over data
- Responding to fairness complaints
- Updating models to address fairness issues
- Reporting on privacy and fairness metrics
- Aligning with regulatory expectations
- Defining key performance indicators
- Establishing monitoring thresholds
- Tracking model accuracy over time
- Detecting concept drift
- Monitoring for unintended consequences
- Collecting user feedback
- Generating compliance reports
- Integrating monitoring into DevOps
- Alerting on performance degradation
- Reviewing model performance regularly
- Documenting monitoring findings
- Adjusting models based on performance data
- Understanding audit expectations for AI governance
- Organizing documentation for easy retrieval
- Preparing for auditor questions
- Demonstrating control implementation
- Providing evidence of risk assessments
- Showing oversight of model updates
- Documenting corrective actions
- Maintaining audit trails
- Coordinating with compliance teams
- Using audit findings to improve governance
- Sharing best practices across teams
- Maintaining certification readiness
How this maps to your situation
- Product-led AI governance in enterprise environments
- Cross-functional alignment on AI control decisions
- Roadmap influence through structured compliance artefacts
- Scaling AI responsibly within complex product portfolios
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 90 minutes per week over six weeks, with flexible access to materials.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic AI ethics courses, this program focuses on ISO 42001 implementation with product-specific templates and real-world examples tailored to senior product owners in tech enterprises.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.