A tailored course, built for your situation
Mastering ISO 42001 for Senior Service Delivery Managers
Build trusted AI governance frameworks that attract high-impact work from senior sponsors
The situation this course is for
Experienced delivery managers often sit outside formal AI governance tracks, even when managing systems affected by new regulations. This creates a gap where trusted ownership of auditor-facing artefacts defaults to specialists without operational context, leading to misaligned controls, rework, and missed opportunities for recognition. Worse, when M&A integrations or regulator reviews arise, the default assignee isn’t always the person who knows the delivery reality. That results in handoffs that lack nuance, increase scrutiny, and bypass the practitioner best positioned to get it right. The issue isn’t competence, it’s documented command of the framework. Without it, even seasoned managers stay below the line when trust-critical work lands.
Who this is for
Senior Service Delivery Managers in global IT services firms who manage client-facing technology operations and compliance touchpoints, often stepping into governance-adjacent work without formal ownership of framework outputs
Who this is not for
Entry-level delivery staff, pure project coordinators without client accountability, or practitioners outside regulated service delivery environments
What you walk away with
- Produce regulator-ready AI governance documentation that stands up under review
- Own the end-to-end response to M&A integration escalations involving AI systems
- Deliver ISO 42001 control mappings with traceable sources and implementation rationale
- Anticipate and resolve peer-team escalations before they reach senior sponsors
- Build a documented AI governance playbook that survives team changes and client transitions
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- What ISO 42001 means for service delivery
- The difference between compliance and trusted ownership
- Why senior sponsors assign sensitive work to certain individuals
- Patterns in M&A escalation routing
- Regulator-facing documentation expectations
- Control ownership vs policy awareness
- Documentation that earns trust
- How peer teams escalate to trusted individuals
- Case: First draft of AI SoA under review
- Attributes of defensible control mapping
- Trust signals in cross-functional response
- Course structure and artefact delivery roadmap
- Clause 5.1 Leadership responsibility
- Clause 5.2 Risk management policy
- Clause 5.3 AI system inventory
- Clause 6.1 Human oversight
- Clause 6.2 Transparency obligations
- Clause 6.3 Data provenance tracking
- Clause 7.1 Training requirements
- Clause 7.2 User documentation
- Clause 8.1 Impact assessment process
- Clause 8.2 Bias mitigation steps
- Clause 9.1 Monitoring frequency
- Clause 9.2 Incident response triggers
- Mapping clause 5 to change advisory boards
- Integrating clause 6 into release planning
- Aligning clause 7 with knowledge transfer
- Applying clause 8 to incident ticketing
- Clause 9 and SLA reporting cycles
- Control mapping to ISO 20000 service levels
- Crosswalking to COBIT DSS04
- Using ServiceNow for control evidence
- Jira workflows for oversight tracking
- Maintaining alignment during M&A
- Updating mappings post-acquisition
- Versioning control documentation
- Defining system boundaries clearly
- Including or excluding shadow AI
- Decision boundaries with human override
- Data ingestion points
- Output distribution channels
- Third-party model use cases
- Vendor-provided AI integration
- On-prem vs cloud inference tracking
- Model version control evidence
- Documenting retraining triggers
- Audit log retention periods
- Boundary updates during integration
- Defining oversight roles
- Shift-based monitoring coverage
- Escalation thresholds
- Review frequency by risk tier
- Documentation of intervention
- Post-action reporting
- Audit trail for override actions
- Training logs for oversight staff
- Review of false positives
- Scoring drift detection
- Threshold adjustment logs
- Monthly oversight summary reports
- Creating model cards for clients
- Public-facing transparency statements
- Regulator-specific disclosures
- Data lineage summaries
- Purpose limitation documentation
- Explainability approach outlines
- Limitations disclosures
- Version-to-version changes
- User-facing notifications
- Client portal content
- Internal transparency dashboards
- Updating disclosures post-update
- Identifying high-risk AI use cases
- Mapping to client industry
- Determining impact levels
- Probability scoring criteria
- Risk heat mapping
- Linking to SLAs
- Client-specific tolerances
- Documentation of rationale
- Updating assessments post-event
- Review frequency triggers
- Aligning with legal inputs
- Final risk register format
- Bias detection in training data
- Representation checks
- Disparity impact testing
- Pre-deployment fairness scoring
- Post-deployment monitoring
- Adjustment thresholds
- Documentation of mitigation
- Client-specific fairness criteria
- Third-party model audits
- Retraining with bias correction
- Reporting on bias metrics
- Escalation to ethics board
- Real-time model performance dashboards
- Drift detection thresholds
- Incident classification levels
- Response team activation
- Client notification timing
- Post-mortem documentation
- Incident logging standards
- Regulator reporting triggers
- Third-party incident coordination
- Breach simulation drills
- Playbook version control
- Audit readiness checks
- Assembling the audit package
- Narrative flow for reviewers
- Control implementation evidence
- Interview preparation for teams
- Escalation routing during audit
- Handling follow-up questions
- Documenting corrective actions
- Maintaining version control
- Confidentiality handling
- Third-party access protocols
- Post-audit improvement plan
- Audit outcome reporting
- Identifying acquired AI assets
- Assessing compliance gaps
- Integrating control frameworks
- Updating system documentation
- Reassigning oversight roles
- Harmonizing incident response
- Client communication strategy
- Vendor contract alignment
- Data retention policy updates
- Cross-company training
- Documenting integration steps
- Post-merger audit prep
- Knowledge transfer planning
- Playbook version management
- Training new staff
- Client onboarding materials
- Handover documentation
- Succession readiness
- Maintaining artefact quality
- Updating for framework changes
- Feedback loops from audits
- Benchmarking against peers
- Recognition for trusted ownership
- Next-level sponsorship pathways
How this maps to your situation
- Preparing for regulator-facing review
- Responding to M&A integration escalation
- Handling peer-team escalation on AI control gap
- Updating documentation for client audit
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3 hours per module, designed for completion over 4-6 weeks with real-world application.
How this compares to the alternatives
Generic AI governance courses teach principles. This course delivers artefacts, control mappings, and escalation-response patterns used in live ISO 42001 deployments, specifically for senior service delivery managers managing client-facing compliance.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.