A tailored course, built for your situation
Mid-Market AI Vendor Risk Assessment for Regulated Industries
A practical, implementation-grade framework for managing AI vendor risk in compliance-sensitive environments
The situation this course is for
Teams are expected to validate AI vendors against compliance, security, and operational standards, but lack a repeatable method. Frameworks are too enterprise-heavy or academic. The result: delayed deployments, inconsistent assessments, and reliance on consultants or one-off checklists.
Who this is for
Compliance officers, risk analysts, technology leads, and operations managers in mid-market firms (200, 2,000 employees) operating in regulated sectors (financial services, healthcare, insurance, legal tech, govtech).
Who this is not for
Enterprise risk teams with dedicated AI governance units or startups using only off-the-shelf consumer AI tools.
What you walk away with
- Apply a standardized assessment framework to any AI vendor engagement
- Map regulatory requirements to technical and contractual controls
- Build cross-functional alignment between legal, tech, and compliance teams
- Reduce vendor onboarding time with reusable templates and scorecards
- Demonstrate audit-ready documentation for internal and external review
The 12 modules (with all 144 chapters)
- Defining AI vendor risk for non-enterprise environments
- Regulatory landscape: where AI oversight is converging
- The cost of poor vendor assessment: real-world case studies
- Balancing innovation velocity with compliance rigor
- Key stakeholders in AI vendor decision-making
- Common pitfalls in early-stage vendor evaluation
- How mid-market constraints shape risk tolerance
- Emerging expectations from boards and auditors
- Differentiating AI from traditional software risk
- The lifecycle of an AI vendor relationship
- Risk escalation pathways and thresholds
- Building your internal risk taxonomy
- Mapping GDPR, HIPAA, and SOC 2 to AI vendor controls
- Sector-specific requirements for financial and health tech
- Using NIST AI RMF as an assessment backbone
- Interpreting FTC and EU AI Act guidance for procurement
- Aligning with internal audit and compliance calendars
- Documenting compliance intent for vendor review
- Handling cross-border data and model inference
- Third-party assurance standards (ISO, SOC, CSA)
- Creating a compliance scorecard for vendors
- Managing regulatory change over time
- Demonstrating due diligence in vendor selection
- Integrating compliance mapping into RFPs
- Designing a vendor intake questionnaire
- Evaluating model transparency and documentation
- Assessing training data provenance and bias mitigation
- Reviewing vendor security and access controls
- Validating model performance claims
- Checking for third-party dependencies and sub-vendors
- Auditing vendor incident response and breach protocols
- Scoring vendor maturity across risk domains
- Using weighted scoring for comparative assessment
- Conducting technical discovery calls
- Identifying red flags in vendor responses
- Documenting assessment rationale
- Key clauses for AI vendor contracts
- Data ownership and usage rights
- Model IP and derivative work protections
- Warranties for model accuracy and fairness
- Indemnification for regulatory penalties
- Right-to-audit provisions and access scope
- Termination triggers and exit rights
- Service level agreements for AI performance
- Change control and model update notifications
- Liability caps and insurance requirements
- Subcontractor oversight and approval
- Dispute resolution for AI-specific failures
- Adapting FRB SR 11-7 for third-party AI
- Validating model inputs, outputs, and logic
- Assessing drift detection and retraining protocols
- Reviewing model documentation (data sheets, model cards)
- Evaluating explainability and interpretability features
- Testing for bias, fairness, and disparate impact
- Conducting adversarial testing and red teaming
- Reviewing version control and model lineage
- Monitoring for concept drift and data decay
- Validating model performance in production
- Assessing fallback and human-in-the-loop mechanisms
- Documenting validation findings
- Data classification and sensitivity mapping
- Mapping data flows in AI vendor systems
- Ensuring data minimization and purpose limitation
- Validating anonymization and pseudonymization
- Assessing cross-border data transfer mechanisms
- Reviewing data retention and deletion policies
- Auditing access logs and user permissions
- Handling subject access requests through vendors
- Evaluating data breach notification timelines
- Integrating vendor data practices into DPIAs
- Managing consent and opt-out mechanisms
- Documenting data governance compliance
- Assessing vendor uptime and SLA reliability
- Reviewing disaster recovery and failover plans
- Evaluating redundancy and geographic distribution
- Testing incident response communication
- Validating backup and restoration procedures
- Assessing vendor financial and operational stability
- Monitoring service degradation and performance drops
- Planning for vendor lock-in and exit strategies
- Documenting business continuity requirements
- Conducting tabletop exercises with vendors
- Reviewing third-party dependencies
- Building internal fallback capabilities
- Designing an ongoing monitoring calendar
- Tracking key risk indicators (KRIs) for vendors
- Conducting periodic reassessments
- Reviewing vendor audit reports (SOC 2, ISO)
- Performing internal spot checks and sampling
- Using dashboards for vendor risk visibility
- Escalating issues to vendor management
- Managing vendor corrective action plans
- Documenting oversight activities
- Preparing for internal and external audits
- Integrating vendor risk into enterprise risk reports
- Automating monitoring where possible
- Identifying key stakeholders in vendor risk
- Building a cross-functional review committee
- Creating shared risk language and definitions
- Facilitating joint assessment sessions
- Managing conflicting priorities across teams
- Communicating risk decisions to leadership
- Training teams on vendor risk expectations
- Integrating risk into procurement workflows
- Documenting stakeholder input and approvals
- Running vendor risk workshops
- Aligning with enterprise architecture
- Scaling practices across business units
- Customizing the assessment framework
- Using the vendor intake template
- Applying the risk scoring matrix
- Populating the compliance mapping grid
- Generating RFP language
- Negotiating contract clauses
- Running technical validation tests
- Conducting stakeholder alignment sessions
- Documenting decisions in the risk ledger
- Using the audit readiness checklist
- Updating the playbook over time
- Training new team members
- Building a vendor risk policy
- Integrating with existing GRC platforms
- Creating a vendor risk training program
- Measuring program effectiveness
- Reporting to board and audit committee
- Benchmarking against peers
- Iterating on the framework
- Managing resource constraints
- Automating assessments and monitoring
- Expanding to other third-party risks
- Recognizing team contributions
- Sustaining momentum over time
- Tracking AI regulation in flight
- Preparing for mandatory AI registries
- Evaluating open-weight vs. closed models
- Assessing generative AI-specific risks
- Monitoring compute and energy use disclosures
- Reviewing AI ethics and human rights frameworks
- Evaluating vendor ESG commitments
- Handling AI-generated content provenance
- Anticipating liability for AI outputs
- Assessing vendor alignment with AI standards
- Planning for AI incident disclosure rules
- Staying ahead of enforcement trends
How this maps to your situation
- Assessing a new AI vendor for procurement
- Responding to an auditor’s request for vendor documentation
- Negotiating contract terms with a high-risk AI provider
- Scaling vendor risk practices across multiple departments
Before vs. after
What's included with your purchase
- 12 modules with 12 chapters each (144 chapters)
- Downloadable templates and worked examples for every module
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Delivery and format
- Course and learning environment access provisioned within 24 hours of purchase
- Hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access
Format: Text-based modules and chapters in the Art of Service learning environment, plus downloadable templates and worked examples for every chapter, plus the hand-built implementation playbook delivered alongside course access.
Time investment: Approximately 3, 4 hours per module, designed for just-in-time learning and immediate application.
How this compares to the alternatives
Unlike generic AI ethics courses or enterprise-heavy frameworks, this program is tailored to mid-market realities, practical, actionable, and focused on vendor assessment, not theoretical AI governance.
Frequently asked
Within 24 hours your account in the learning environment is provisioned and the tailored implementation playbook is delivered alongside it.