Literature Review Toolkit

Save time, empower your teams and effectively upgrade your processes with access to this practical Literature Review Toolkit and guide. Address common challenges with best-practice templates, step-by-step work plans and maturity diagnostics for any Literature Review related project.

Download the Toolkit and in Three Steps you will be guided from idea to implementation results.

The Toolkit contains the following practical and powerful enablers with new and updated Literature Review specific requirements:

STEP 1: Get your bearings

Start with...


• The latest quick edition of the Literature Review Self Assessment book in PDF containing 49 requirements to perform a quickscan, get an overview and share with stakeholders.


Organized in a data driven improvement cycle RDMAICS (Recognize, Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control and Sustain), check the…


• Example pre-filled Self-Assessment Excel Dashboard to get familiar with results generation


Then find your goals...

STEP 2: Set concrete goals, tasks, dates and numbers you can track

Featuring 997 new and updated case-based questions, organized into seven core areas of process design, this Self-Assessment will help you identify areas in which Literature Review improvements can be made.

Examples; 10 of the 997 standard requirements:


1. Do you need to gain an overview of a topic, understand the material in depth, find specific information for a literature review, understand the argument or main focus, or critically evaluate ideas?
   
   

2. How does the Contracting authority envision quantitative, statistical and size or effect based metrics being sourced or produced from the sources identified in the literature review?
   
   

3. When deciding on the probability and severity of occurrence, do you need to review historical data to determine how frequently a hazard occurs or base it on literature?
   
   

4. Have you provided a comprehensive literature review of the data collection methods used and included details regarding the strengths and limitations of each method?
   
   

5. Does the literature review make the relationships among the variables explicit or place the variables within a theoretical/conceptual framework?
   
   

6. Does the compiled information, including data modeling tools, and literature review, provide a scientific basis for the conclusions reached?
   
   

7. What value can be drawn from the literature with regard to the generation of requirements specifications from software engineering models?
   
   

8. Where do you find research paper online marketing taking notes for research paper introduction literature review on brand awareness?
   
   

9. What, if anything, did you find especially difficult or challenging about using the narrative structures in your storyboard writing?
   
   

10. Can a comprehensive review of the literature establish a common theme of best practice guidelines for workplace wellness activities?
    
    


Complete the self assessment, on your own or with a team in a workshop setting. Use the workbook together with the self assessment requirements spreadsheet:


• The workbook is the latest in-depth complete edition of the Literature Review book in PDF containing 997 requirements, which criteria correspond to the criteria in...


Your Literature Review self-assessment dashboard which gives you your dynamically prioritized projects-ready tool and shows your organization exactly what to do next:


• The Self-Assessment Excel Dashboard; with the Literature Review Self-Assessment and Scorecard you will develop a clear picture of which Literature Review areas need attention, which requirements you should focus on and who will be responsible for them:
  
  


• Shows your organization instant insight in areas for improvement: Auto generates reports, radar chart for maturity assessment, insights per process and participant and bespoke, ready to use, RACI Matrix

• Gives you a professional Dashboard to guide and perform a thorough Literature Review Self-Assessment

• Is secure: Ensures offline data protection of your Self-Assessment results

• Dynamically prioritized projects-ready RACI Matrix shows your organization exactly what to do next:



STEP 3: Implement, Track, follow up and revise strategy

The outcomes of STEP 2, the self assessment, are the inputs for STEP 3; Start and manage Literature Review projects with the 62 implementation resources:


• 62 step-by-step Literature Review Project Management Form Templates covering over 1500 Literature Review project requirements and success criteria:


Examples; 10 of the check box criteria:


1. Quality Audit: Is your organizational structure a help or a hindrance to deployment?
   
   

2. Procurement Audit: How do you address the risk of fraud and corruption?
   
   

3. Procurement Audit: Are copies of policies made available to staff members involved in budget preparation and administration?
   
   

4. Human Resource Management Plan: Account for the purpose of this Literature Review project by describing, at a high-level, what will be done. What is this Literature Review project aiming to achieve?
   
   

5. Quality Audit: Quality is about improvement and accountability. The immediate questions that arise out of that statement are: (i) improvement on what, and (ii) accountable to whom?
   
   

6. Procurement Management Plan: Is it possible to track all classes of Literature Review project work (e.g. scheduled, un-scheduled, defect repair, etc.)?
   
   

7. Initiating Process Group: What are the overarching issues of your organization?
   
   

8. Schedule Management Plan: Do Literature Review project teams & team members report on status / activities / progress?
   
   

9. Procurement Audit: Are reports based on sound data available to the already stated responsible for monitoring the performance of contracts?
   
   

10. Procurement Audit: Is there a policy on purchasing from users of organization products?


 
Step-by-step and complete Literature Review Project Management Forms and Templates including check box criteria and templates.

1.0 Initiating Process Group:


• 1.1 Literature Review project Charter

• 1.2 Stakeholder Register

• 1.3 Stakeholder Analysis Matrix


2.0 Planning Process Group:


• 2.1 Literature Review project Management Plan

• 2.2 Scope Management Plan

• 2.3 Requirements Management Plan

• 2.4 Requirements Documentation

• 2.5 Requirements Traceability Matrix

• 2.6 Literature Review project Scope Statement

• 2.7 Assumption and Constraint Log

• 2.8 Work Breakdown Structure

• 2.9 WBS Dictionary

• 2.10 Schedule Management Plan

• 2.11 Activity List

• 2.12 Activity Attributes

• 2.13 Milestone List

• 2.14 Network Diagram

• 2.15 Activity Resource Requirements

• 2.16 Resource Breakdown Structure

• 2.17 Activity Duration Estimates

• 2.18 Duration Estimating Worksheet

• 2.19 Literature Review project Schedule

• 2.20 Cost Management Plan

• 2.21 Activity Cost Estimates

• 2.22 Cost Estimating Worksheet

• 2.23 Cost Baseline

• 2.24 Quality Management Plan

• 2.25 Quality Metrics

• 2.26 Process Improvement Plan

• 2.27 Responsibility Assignment Matrix

• 2.28 Roles and Responsibilities

• 2.29 Human Resource Management Plan

• 2.30 Communications Management Plan

• 2.31 Risk Management Plan

• 2.32 Risk Register

• 2.33 Probability and Impact Assessment

• 2.34 Probability and Impact Matrix

• 2.35 Risk Data Sheet

• 2.36 Procurement Management Plan

• 2.37 Source Selection Criteria

• 2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan

• 2.39 Change Management Plan


3.0 Executing Process Group:


• 3.1 Team Member Status Report

• 3.2 Change Request

• 3.3 Change Log

• 3.4 Decision Log

• 3.5 Quality Audit

• 3.6 Team Directory

• 3.7 Team Operating Agreement

• 3.8 Team Performance Assessment

• 3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment

• 3.10 Issue Log


4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group:


• 4.1 Literature Review project Performance Report

• 4.2 Variance Analysis

• 4.3 Earned Value Status

• 4.4 Risk Audit

• 4.5 Contractor Status Report

• 4.6 Formal Acceptance


5.0 Closing Process Group:


• 5.1 Procurement Audit

• 5.2 Contract Close-Out

• 5.3 Literature Review project or Phase Close-Out

• 5.4 Lessons Learned


Results

With this Three Step process you will have all the tools you need for any Literature Review project with this in-depth Literature Review Toolkit.

In using the Toolkit you will be better able to:


• Diagnose Literature Review projects, initiatives, organizations, businesses and processes using accepted diagnostic standards and practices

• Implement evidence-based best practice strategies aligned with overall goals

• Integrate recent advances in Literature Review and put process design strategies into practice according to best practice guidelines


Defining, designing, creating, and implementing a process to solve a business challenge or meet a business objective is the most valuable role; In EVERY company, organization and department.

Unless you are talking a one-time, single-use project within a business, there should be a process. Whether that process is managed and implemented by humans, AI, or a combination of the two, it needs to be designed by someone with a complex enough perspective to ask the right questions. Someone capable of asking the right questions and step back and say, 'What are we really trying to accomplish here? And is there a different way to look at it?'

This Toolkit empowers people to do just that - whether their title is entrepreneur, manager, consultant, (Vice-)President, CxO etc... - they are the people who rule the future. They are the person who asks the right questions to make Literature Review investments work better.

This Literature Review All-Inclusive Toolkit enables You to be that person.

Includes lifetime updates

Every self assessment comes with Lifetime Updates and Lifetime Free Updated Books. Lifetime Updates is an industry-first feature which allows you to receive verified self assessment updates, ensuring you always have the most accurate information at your fingertips.