Looking to improve your Device Management and ensure Patch Delivery of results? Look no further than our Patch Delivery in Device Management Knowledge Base.
Our comprehensive dataset contains over 1500 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and case studies, making it the ultimate resource for getting the best results with urgency and scope.
Why choose our Patch Delivery in Device Management Knowledge Base? We′ve done the research for you, compiling the most important questions to ask and providing you with real-life examples of successful implementations.
Our dataset offers a complete overview of the topic, saving you time and effort on tedious research.
Compared to other similar datasets, our Patch Delivery in Device Management Knowledge Base takes the lead in terms of quality and quantity.
Our commitment to providing professionals with the best resources sets us apart from competitors and alternatives.
Plus, our product is user-friendly and DIY, making it an affordable option for individuals and businesses alike.
With our Patch Delivery in Device Management dataset, you′ll have access to in-depth product details and specifications, allowing you to fully understand and utilize its features.
This type of knowledge base is unique and specialized, serving as a valuable tool for professionals looking to enhance their Device Management.
But the benefits don′t end there.
Our Patch Delivery in Device Management Knowledge Base offers insights for businesses as well.
By implementing our recommendations, businesses can improve efficiency, save time, and increase overall success.
Concerned about cost? Our Patch Delivery in Device Management Knowledge Base is a cost-effective solution compared to hiring consultants or investing in expensive alternatives.
And with our detailed pros and cons list, you′ll have all the information you need to make an informed decision.
So what exactly does our Patch Delivery in Device Management Knowledge Base offer? It covers everything from understanding the importance of Patch Delivery in DevSecOps to practical steps for implementation and real-world case studies.
With our dataset, you′ll have all the tools you need to optimize your Device Management and achieve the best results.
Don′t waste any more time sifting through endless information.
Invest in our Patch Delivery in Device Management Knowledge Base and see the benefits for yourself.
Order now and take your Device Management to the next level with Patch Delivery as a top priority.
What is the vendors track record for timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery?
Patch Delivery
Patch Delivery refers to the ability of a vendor to consistently provide vulnerability information and patches in a timely manner.
1. Regular vulnerability scanning and testing to identify potential threats quickly.
2. Continuous monitoring for new cyber threats and vulnerabilities.
3. Collaborating with vendors for timely patch delivery.
4. Automation of patch management process for faster deployment.
5. Utilizing tools that prioritize critical patches for faster response.
6. Establishing a rapid response team for immediate patch implementation.
7. Implementing agile development practices for quicker delivery of secure code.
8. Prioritizing security in the software development lifecycle to minimize vulnerabilities.
9. Regular training and education for developers on secure coding practices.
10. Implementing a DevSecOps culture for seamless collaboration between development, operations, and security teams.
CONTROL QUESTION: What is the vendors track record for timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, Patch Delivery aims to have a flawless track record for timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery. Our goal is to be known as the leader in the industry when it comes to promptly addressing and mitigating security vulnerabilities.
We envision a future where our vendors consistently deliver comprehensive reports on any potential vulnerabilities within our systems, allowing us to promptly assess and prioritize patching efforts. Within 24 hours of receiving a vulnerability report, our team will work diligently to develop and implement a patch, ensuring that our customers′ data remains secure.
Our dedication to Patch Delivery will extend beyond just patches and updates. We will also strive to provide regular and transparent communication with our customers and partners regarding any potential vulnerabilities and the steps we are taking to address them.
By consistently meeting our 24-hour turnaround time and maintaining high-quality and effective patches, we will build trust and confidence among our users and stakeholders. Our ultimate goal is to create a secure environment for all our customers, setting a new standard of excellence in the industry for timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery.
"The data is clean, organized, and easy to access. I was able to import it into my workflow seamlessly and start seeing results immediately."
Case Study: Patch Delivery - A Study of Vendor′s Track Record for Timely Vulnerability Disclosure and Patch Delivery
Synopsis:
Patch Delivery is a large multinational corporation that specializes in the manufacturing and distribution of consumer electronics products. The company has a wide range of products such as smartphones, laptops, televisions, and home appliances. With a global presence and a vast customer base, Patch Delivery holds a strong market position in the consumer electronics industry. However, with the increasing use of technology and internet-connected devices, the company faces the constant threat of cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Any successful cyberattack could result in data breaches, financial losses, and damage to the brand′s reputation.
To mitigate these risks, Patch Delivery has engaged the services of a consulting firm to assess its vendor′s track record for timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of its vendor′s vulnerability handling processes and identify any areas that require improvement. By doing so, Patch Delivery aims to ensure that its vendor′s security practices align with industry standards and best practices, thereby strengthening its own cybersecurity posture and protecting its customers′ data.
Consulting Methodology:
The consulting methodology used for this case study is based on a four-step process – Assessment, Analysis, Solutions, and Implementation.
Assessment: The consulting team begins by conducting a thorough assessment of Patch Delivery′s current vendor risk management practices. This includes reviewing its vendor risk management policy and procedures, identifying key vendors who have access to critical data and systems, and evaluating the consequences of vendor security incidents.
Analysis: In the second step, the consulting team analyzes Patch Delivery′s vendor′s track record for timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery. This involves examining the vendor′s vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery processes, their adherence to industry standards and regulations, and their response time for fixing discovered vulnerabilities.
Solutions: Based on the analysis, the consulting team identifies potential solutions for improving the vendor′s vulnerability handling processes. This could include implementing a formalized vulnerability disclosure program, setting up a dedicated security team to handle vendor security incidents, and providing regular training and awareness programs for vendors.
Implementation: The final step involves working closely with Patch Delivery and its vendors to implement the recommended solutions. This includes creating and implementing a vendor security risk management plan, setting up vendor security requirements and metrics, and conducting regular security audits to monitor the effectiveness of the implemented solutions.
Deliverables:
The consulting team will provide Patch Delivery with a comprehensive report that includes the following deliverables:
1. Assessment report: A detailed assessment report of Patch Delivery′s current vendor risk management practices, including findings and recommendations for improvement.
2. Analysis report: A report that analyzes the vendor′s track record for timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery, highlighting any deficiencies and areas for improvement.
3. Solutions report: A report outlining potential solutions for improving the vendor′s vulnerability handling processes and aligning them with industry standards and best practices.
4. Implementation plan: A detailed implementation plan that outlines the steps required to implement the recommended solutions effectively.
5. Security metrics: A set of security metrics that can be used to measure the effectiveness of the implemented solutions in improving the vendor′s vulnerability handling processes.
Implementation Challenges:
The consulting team may face several challenges while implementing the recommended solutions, such as:
1. Resistance to change: Vendors may resist the changes proposed by the consulting team, particularly if it involves additional resources or costs.
2. Lack of resources: Some vendors may lack the necessary resources, expertise, or infrastructure to implement the recommended solutions.
3. Non-compliance: Vendors may not comply with the security requirements set by Patch Delivery, risking a breakdown in their business relationship.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
To measure the success of the implemented solutions, the following KPIs will be used:
1. Mean Time to Patch (MTTP): This measures the time taken by the vendor to develop and distribute patches for identified vulnerabilities.
2. Number of Critical Vulnerabilities: This tracks the number of critical vulnerabilities found in the vendor′s products and the time taken to disclose them.
3. Vendor Compliance Score: This measures the level of compliance of vendors with Patch Delivery′s security requirements and policies.
Management Considerations:
To ensure the success of this project, Patch Delivery must consider the following management considerations:
1. Management Support: Top management at Patch Delivery must actively support and endorse the proposed solutions and be willing to allocate the necessary resources for their implementation.
2. Effective Communication: Regular communication between Patch Delivery and its vendors is crucial to achieving the desired outcomes and keeping stakeholders informed about progress.
3. Continuous Monitoring: Patch Delivery must continuously monitor its vendors′ security practices to ensure they are adhering to the recommended solutions and meeting the set security requirements.
Conclusion:
By undertaking this study, Patch Delivery aims to improve the security posture of its vendors, reduce the risk of cyberattacks, and safeguard its customers′ data. By closely working with its vendors and implementing the recommended solutions, Patch Delivery can ensure its vendors′ timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery, thereby protecting its reputation and maintaining its competitive advantage in the market.
Citations:
1. Bryans, M. J. (2012). A critical review of reputation management research. Journal of Business Research, 65(5), 617-625.
2. Chew, W., & Crossland, M. (2007). Integrating the concept of vulnerability into firm′s reputation assessment. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(2), 103-114.
3. ENISA. (2019). Supplier risk management – Incident handling guide. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity.
4. Infosys Consulting. (2016). Vendor Risk Management – Taming Complexity and Uncertainty. Infosys Limited.
5. Kim, S., & Ghosh, J. (2013). Quantification of Timeliness of Information and its Effect on Security Risk Management. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 14(1), 25-46.
6. PwC. (2018). Managing third-party cybersecurity – Protecting your organization from cyber risks beyond your perimeter. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
7. Reider, D., & Shull, F. (2015). Maximizing IT vendor risk management effectiveness. Business Horizons, 58(2), 187-195.
8. Schatz, F., Suchman, M., Cuschieri, J., & Armstrong, S. (2017). Emerging trends in vendor risk management and third-party software scrutiny. Crowe Horwath LLP.
Our comprehensive dataset contains over 1500 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and case studies, making it the ultimate resource for getting the best results with urgency and scope.
Why choose our Patch Delivery in Device Management Knowledge Base? We′ve done the research for you, compiling the most important questions to ask and providing you with real-life examples of successful implementations.
Our dataset offers a complete overview of the topic, saving you time and effort on tedious research.
Compared to other similar datasets, our Patch Delivery in Device Management Knowledge Base takes the lead in terms of quality and quantity.
Our commitment to providing professionals with the best resources sets us apart from competitors and alternatives.
Plus, our product is user-friendly and DIY, making it an affordable option for individuals and businesses alike.
With our Patch Delivery in Device Management dataset, you′ll have access to in-depth product details and specifications, allowing you to fully understand and utilize its features.
This type of knowledge base is unique and specialized, serving as a valuable tool for professionals looking to enhance their Device Management.
But the benefits don′t end there.
Our Patch Delivery in Device Management Knowledge Base offers insights for businesses as well.
By implementing our recommendations, businesses can improve efficiency, save time, and increase overall success.
Concerned about cost? Our Patch Delivery in Device Management Knowledge Base is a cost-effective solution compared to hiring consultants or investing in expensive alternatives.
And with our detailed pros and cons list, you′ll have all the information you need to make an informed decision.
So what exactly does our Patch Delivery in Device Management Knowledge Base offer? It covers everything from understanding the importance of Patch Delivery in DevSecOps to practical steps for implementation and real-world case studies.
With our dataset, you′ll have all the tools you need to optimize your Device Management and achieve the best results.
Don′t waste any more time sifting through endless information.
Invest in our Patch Delivery in Device Management Knowledge Base and see the benefits for yourself.
Order now and take your Device Management to the next level with Patch Delivery as a top priority.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1585 prioritized Patch Delivery requirements. - Extensive coverage of 126 Patch Delivery topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 126 Patch Delivery step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 126 Patch Delivery case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Compliance Requirements, Breach Detection, Secure SDLC, User Provisioning, DevOps Tools, Secure Load Balancing, Risk Based Vulnerability Management, Secure Deployment, Development First Security, Environment Isolation, Infrastructure As Code, Security Awareness Training, Automated Testing, Data Classification, Device Management, Team Strategy Development, Secure Mobile Development, Security Culture, Secure Configuration, System Hardening, Disaster Recovery, Security Risk Management, New Development, Database Security, Cloud Security, System Configuration Management, Security Compliance Checks, Cloud Security Posture Management, Secure Network Architecture, Security Hardening, Defence Systems, Asset Management, DevOps Collaboration, Logging And Monitoring, Secure Development Lifecycle, Bug Bounty, Release Management, Code Reviews, Secure Infrastructure, Security By Design, Security Patching, Visibility And Audit, Forced Authentication, ITSM, Continuous Delivery, Container Security, Application Security, Centralized Logging, Secure Web Proxy, Software Testing, Code Complexity Analysis, Backup And Recovery, Security Automation, Secure Containerization, Sprint Backlog, Secure Mobile Device Management, Feature Flag Management, Automated Security Testing, Penetration Testing, Infrastructure As Code Automation, Version Control, Compliance Reporting, Continuous Integration, Infrastructure Hardening, Cost Strategy, File Integrity Monitoring, Secure Communication, Vulnerability Scanning, Secure APIs, DevSecOps Metrics, Barrier Assessments, Root Cause Analysis, Secure Backup Solutions, Continuous Security, Technology Strategies, Host Based Security, Configuration Management, Service Level Agreements, Career Development, Digital Operations, Malware Prevention, Security Certifications, Identity And Access Management, Secure Incident Response Plan, Secure Cloud Storage, Transition Strategy, Patch Management, Access Control, Secure DevOps Environment, Threat Intelligence, Secure Automated Build, Agile Methodology, Security Management For Microservices, Container Security Orchestration, Change Management, Privileged Access Management, Security Policies, Security Code Analysis, Threat Modeling, Mobile App Development, Secure Architecture, Threat Hunting, Secure Software Development, And Compliance GRC, Security Auditing, Network Security, Security Monitoring, Cycles Increase, Secure Software Supply Chain, Real Time Security Monitoring, Vulnerability Remediation, Security Governance, Secure Third Party Integration, Secret Management, Secure Vendor Management, Risk Assessment, Web Application Firewall, Secure Coding, Secure Code Review, Mobile Application Security, Secure Network Segmentation, Secure Cloud Migration, Infrastructure Monitoring, Incident Response, Container Orchestration, Patch Delivery
Patch Delivery Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Patch Delivery
Patch Delivery refers to the ability of a vendor to consistently provide vulnerability information and patches in a timely manner.
1. Regular vulnerability scanning and testing to identify potential threats quickly.
2. Continuous monitoring for new cyber threats and vulnerabilities.
3. Collaborating with vendors for timely patch delivery.
4. Automation of patch management process for faster deployment.
5. Utilizing tools that prioritize critical patches for faster response.
6. Establishing a rapid response team for immediate patch implementation.
7. Implementing agile development practices for quicker delivery of secure code.
8. Prioritizing security in the software development lifecycle to minimize vulnerabilities.
9. Regular training and education for developers on secure coding practices.
10. Implementing a DevSecOps culture for seamless collaboration between development, operations, and security teams.
CONTROL QUESTION: What is the vendors track record for timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, Patch Delivery aims to have a flawless track record for timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery. Our goal is to be known as the leader in the industry when it comes to promptly addressing and mitigating security vulnerabilities.
We envision a future where our vendors consistently deliver comprehensive reports on any potential vulnerabilities within our systems, allowing us to promptly assess and prioritize patching efforts. Within 24 hours of receiving a vulnerability report, our team will work diligently to develop and implement a patch, ensuring that our customers′ data remains secure.
Our dedication to Patch Delivery will extend beyond just patches and updates. We will also strive to provide regular and transparent communication with our customers and partners regarding any potential vulnerabilities and the steps we are taking to address them.
By consistently meeting our 24-hour turnaround time and maintaining high-quality and effective patches, we will build trust and confidence among our users and stakeholders. Our ultimate goal is to create a secure environment for all our customers, setting a new standard of excellence in the industry for timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery.
Customer Testimonials:
"The data is clean, organized, and easy to access. I was able to import it into my workflow seamlessly and start seeing results immediately."
"The creators of this dataset did an excellent job curating and cleaning the data. It`s evident they put a lot of effort into ensuring its reliability. Thumbs up!"
"This dataset is a gem. The prioritized recommendations are not only accurate but also presented in a way that is easy to understand. A valuable resource for anyone looking to make data-driven decisions."
Patch Delivery Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Case Study: Patch Delivery - A Study of Vendor′s Track Record for Timely Vulnerability Disclosure and Patch Delivery
Synopsis:
Patch Delivery is a large multinational corporation that specializes in the manufacturing and distribution of consumer electronics products. The company has a wide range of products such as smartphones, laptops, televisions, and home appliances. With a global presence and a vast customer base, Patch Delivery holds a strong market position in the consumer electronics industry. However, with the increasing use of technology and internet-connected devices, the company faces the constant threat of cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Any successful cyberattack could result in data breaches, financial losses, and damage to the brand′s reputation.
To mitigate these risks, Patch Delivery has engaged the services of a consulting firm to assess its vendor′s track record for timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of its vendor′s vulnerability handling processes and identify any areas that require improvement. By doing so, Patch Delivery aims to ensure that its vendor′s security practices align with industry standards and best practices, thereby strengthening its own cybersecurity posture and protecting its customers′ data.
Consulting Methodology:
The consulting methodology used for this case study is based on a four-step process – Assessment, Analysis, Solutions, and Implementation.
Assessment: The consulting team begins by conducting a thorough assessment of Patch Delivery′s current vendor risk management practices. This includes reviewing its vendor risk management policy and procedures, identifying key vendors who have access to critical data and systems, and evaluating the consequences of vendor security incidents.
Analysis: In the second step, the consulting team analyzes Patch Delivery′s vendor′s track record for timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery. This involves examining the vendor′s vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery processes, their adherence to industry standards and regulations, and their response time for fixing discovered vulnerabilities.
Solutions: Based on the analysis, the consulting team identifies potential solutions for improving the vendor′s vulnerability handling processes. This could include implementing a formalized vulnerability disclosure program, setting up a dedicated security team to handle vendor security incidents, and providing regular training and awareness programs for vendors.
Implementation: The final step involves working closely with Patch Delivery and its vendors to implement the recommended solutions. This includes creating and implementing a vendor security risk management plan, setting up vendor security requirements and metrics, and conducting regular security audits to monitor the effectiveness of the implemented solutions.
Deliverables:
The consulting team will provide Patch Delivery with a comprehensive report that includes the following deliverables:
1. Assessment report: A detailed assessment report of Patch Delivery′s current vendor risk management practices, including findings and recommendations for improvement.
2. Analysis report: A report that analyzes the vendor′s track record for timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery, highlighting any deficiencies and areas for improvement.
3. Solutions report: A report outlining potential solutions for improving the vendor′s vulnerability handling processes and aligning them with industry standards and best practices.
4. Implementation plan: A detailed implementation plan that outlines the steps required to implement the recommended solutions effectively.
5. Security metrics: A set of security metrics that can be used to measure the effectiveness of the implemented solutions in improving the vendor′s vulnerability handling processes.
Implementation Challenges:
The consulting team may face several challenges while implementing the recommended solutions, such as:
1. Resistance to change: Vendors may resist the changes proposed by the consulting team, particularly if it involves additional resources or costs.
2. Lack of resources: Some vendors may lack the necessary resources, expertise, or infrastructure to implement the recommended solutions.
3. Non-compliance: Vendors may not comply with the security requirements set by Patch Delivery, risking a breakdown in their business relationship.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
To measure the success of the implemented solutions, the following KPIs will be used:
1. Mean Time to Patch (MTTP): This measures the time taken by the vendor to develop and distribute patches for identified vulnerabilities.
2. Number of Critical Vulnerabilities: This tracks the number of critical vulnerabilities found in the vendor′s products and the time taken to disclose them.
3. Vendor Compliance Score: This measures the level of compliance of vendors with Patch Delivery′s security requirements and policies.
Management Considerations:
To ensure the success of this project, Patch Delivery must consider the following management considerations:
1. Management Support: Top management at Patch Delivery must actively support and endorse the proposed solutions and be willing to allocate the necessary resources for their implementation.
2. Effective Communication: Regular communication between Patch Delivery and its vendors is crucial to achieving the desired outcomes and keeping stakeholders informed about progress.
3. Continuous Monitoring: Patch Delivery must continuously monitor its vendors′ security practices to ensure they are adhering to the recommended solutions and meeting the set security requirements.
Conclusion:
By undertaking this study, Patch Delivery aims to improve the security posture of its vendors, reduce the risk of cyberattacks, and safeguard its customers′ data. By closely working with its vendors and implementing the recommended solutions, Patch Delivery can ensure its vendors′ timely vulnerability disclosure and patch delivery, thereby protecting its reputation and maintaining its competitive advantage in the market.
Citations:
1. Bryans, M. J. (2012). A critical review of reputation management research. Journal of Business Research, 65(5), 617-625.
2. Chew, W., & Crossland, M. (2007). Integrating the concept of vulnerability into firm′s reputation assessment. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(2), 103-114.
3. ENISA. (2019). Supplier risk management – Incident handling guide. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity.
4. Infosys Consulting. (2016). Vendor Risk Management – Taming Complexity and Uncertainty. Infosys Limited.
5. Kim, S., & Ghosh, J. (2013). Quantification of Timeliness of Information and its Effect on Security Risk Management. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 14(1), 25-46.
6. PwC. (2018). Managing third-party cybersecurity – Protecting your organization from cyber risks beyond your perimeter. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
7. Reider, D., & Shull, F. (2015). Maximizing IT vendor risk management effectiveness. Business Horizons, 58(2), 187-195.
8. Schatz, F., Suchman, M., Cuschieri, J., & Armstrong, S. (2017). Emerging trends in vendor risk management and third-party software scrutiny. Crowe Horwath LLP.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
