Attention all service organizations!
Are you looking for a way to improve your operations and achieve better results? Look no further than our Programs Implemented in Data Center Knowledge Base.
This comprehensive dataset is packed with 1560 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, and results that will help streamline and optimize your Data Centers.
With a focus on urgency and scope, this knowledge base contains the most important questions to ask in order to get tangible results.
But what makes our Programs Implemented in Data Center dataset stand out from its competitors and alternatives? The answer lies in its professional and comprehensive approach.
This dataset is specifically designed for professionals like yourself, offering a detailed overview of product types and specifications, as well as real-world case studies and use cases.
Not only that, but our product is also affordable and DIY-friendly, making it accessible for businesses of all sizes.
You can easily utilize this knowledge base to improve your Data Centers without breaking the bank.
So, what can you expect when using our Programs Implemented in Data Center dataset? By following the proven principles of Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement, you can expect to see increased efficiency, reduced costs, and improved customer satisfaction.
Plus, with our carefully curated research on Programs Implemented in Data Center, you can trust in the effectiveness and reliability of our product.
Don′t waste any more time or resources on outdated and inefficient Data Centers.
Invest in our Programs Implemented in Data Center Knowledge Base and experience the numerous benefits it has to offer.
From businesses of all sizes to professional individuals, this dataset is a must-have for anyone looking to take their Data Centers to the next level.
Act now and start reaping the rewards of improved processes and results.
Do radical step change improvement programs yield better or faster results than TQM type continuous change programs?
Programs Implemented
Lean Management focuses on eliminating waste and maximizing value for the customer. Six Sigma uses data and analysis to minimize defects and variability. Continuous improvement involves making ongoing, incremental changes to improve processes and products. Whether a radical step change or continuous approach is more effective depends on the specific circumstances and goals of the organization.
Lean Management:
- Focuses on eliminating waste and improving efficiency
- Increases productivity and reduces costs in the long term
- Utilizes a systematic approach to problem-solving
Six Sigma:
- Aims for near-perfect processes by reducing defects and variations
- Results in increased quality and customer satisfaction
- Emphasizes data-driven decision making and rigorous analysis
Continuous Improvement:
- Encourages small, incremental changes on a regular basis
- Builds a culture of continuous learning and improvement
- Allows for flexibility and adaptability to changing business needs
Overall benefits:
- Improve service delivery, quality, and customer satisfaction
- Increase efficiency and reduce costs
- Foster a culture of continuous improvement for sustained success
CONTROL QUESTION: Do radical step change improvement programs yield better or faster results than TQM type continuous change programs?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now: Abstract In today’s ever-changing landscape, businesses face significant competition, both domestically and globally, which requires them to continuously challenge and improve their processes in order to remain competitive. Lean management, Six Sigma, and continuous improvement methodologies are all widely used approaches to achieve operational excellence and desired organizational outcomes. However, there is a debate among experts as to whether radical step change improvement programs, such as Lean and Six Sigma, are more effective than continuous improvement programs like Total Quality Management (TQM). In this paper, we will explore the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and propose a big hairy audacious goal for 10 years from now for Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement.
The Debate: Radical Step Change vs. Continuous Change
Radical step change improvement programs, such as Lean and Six Sigma, are based on the idea of making large, rapid improvements in a short period of time. These programs typically involve a top-down approach, where leaders and experts identify areas for improvement and implement structured methodologies to achieve significant cost reductions, increased efficiency, and improved quality. This approach is often seen as a quick fix solution to organizational problems and is associated with dramatic results.
On the other hand, continuous improvement programs like TQM focus on incremental, ongoing improvements to processes, systems, and products. This approach involves empowering employees at all levels to identify and solve problems on a day-to-day basis, using tools and techniques such as root cause analysis, process mapping, and customer feedback. Continuous improvement is seen as a long-term, sustainable approach that promotes a culture of quality and drives overall organizational improvement.
Strengths and Weaknesses
Both radical step change and continuous improvement programs have their own strengths and weaknesses.
Radical step change programs can produce quick and impressive results, which can be appealing to organizations looking for immediate changes. These programs utilize well-defined tools and methodologies, such as Six Sigma′s DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) process, which can provide structure and guidance for improvement projects. However, these programs can be expensive and time-consuming to implement, and can sometimes lead to resistance from employees who feel excluded from the decision-making process.
On the other hand, continuous improvement programs promote a culture of involvement and empowerment, which can result in increased employee engagement and ownership over processes. These programs also often rely on the use of data and customer feedback, allowing for more targeted and sustainable improvements. However, continuous improvement can sometimes be slow and small-scale, and may not achieve the same level of dramatic results as radical step change programs.
The BHAG for Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement
Given the strengths and weaknesses of radical step change and continuous improvement programs, our big hairy audacious goal for 10 years from now for Lean management, Six Sigma, and continuous improvement is to merge the best aspects of both approaches to create a truly transformative and sustainable improvement program.
Specifically, our goal is to develop a methodology, or a hybrid approach, that integrates the rapid improvement methods of Lean and Six Sigma with the long-term, data-driven continuous improvement methods of TQM. This approach would leverage the structured problem-solving techniques and tools of Lean and Six Sigma while promoting a culture of employee involvement and data-based decision-making. It would also focus on creating an ongoing learning and improvement mindset within the organization.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while both radical step change programs and continuous improvement programs have their own strengths and weaknesses, our big hairy audacious goal for 10 years from now is to merge the best aspects of both approaches to create a hybrid methodology that offers the benefits of both approaches. This would enable organizations to achieve rapid, significant improvements while also fostering a sustainable, employee-driven culture of continuous improvement. By 2030, we envision this approach becoming the gold standard for achieving operational excellence and driving continuous improvement in organizations of all sizes and industries.
"The documentation is clear and concise, making it easy for even beginners to understand and utilize the dataset."
Case Study: Lean Management, Six Sigma, Continuous Improvement Implementation at XYZ Company
Client Situation:
XYZ Company is a large multinational organization operating in the manufacturing industry. The company has been facing stiff competition from its competitors due to increased customer demands for higher quality products at lower prices. In order to remain competitive in the market, XYZ Company recognized the need to improve its operational efficiency and reduce waste. The management team at XYZ Company decided to implement a transformational improvement program that would enable the organization to achieve sustainable growth and meet the evolving customer expectations.
Consulting Methodology:
The XYZ Company management team consulted with a leading management consulting firm to design and implement a comprehensive improvement program. After analyzing the current state of the organization, the consulting team recommended a combination of Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement methodology to address the company′s challenges. The methodology included a top-down approach targeting organizational culture, process optimization, and employee engagement.
Deliverables:
The consulting team worked closely with the XYZ Company management team to develop a roadmap for the implementation of Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement. The roadmap outlined the key deliverables and milestones that needed to be achieved throughout the implementation process. These included:
1. Change in Organizational Culture: The transformation program aimed to change the organizational culture from a reactive mindset to a proactive one, promoting continuous improvement in all aspects of the organization.
2. Process Optimization: The consulting team conducted a thorough analysis of the company′s processes, identified bottlenecks, and developed solutions to optimize processes and eliminate waste.
3. Employee Engagement: The success of the transformation program relied heavily on employee engagement and involvement. As such, training programs were developed to equip employees with the necessary skills and knowledge to participate in the improvement initiatives.
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement at XYZ Company was not without its challenges. The major challenges included resistance to change, lack of buy-in from middle management, and limited resources. The consulting team managed these challenges by involving all levels of the organization in the program, providing training and support to employees, and showcasing the benefits of the program through pilot projects.
KPIs:
The success of the transformation program was measured using key performance indicators (KPIs). These included:
1. Cost Reduction: One of the main goals of the program was to reduce costs by eliminating waste and optimizing processes. The KPI for this was a reduction in production costs by 5% within the first year of implementation.
2. Quality Improvement: Another key goal was to improve the quality of products and services delivered to customers. The KPI for this was a 10% increase in customer satisfaction scores within the first year of implementation.
3. Employee Engagement: The success of the program heavily relied on the engagement and involvement of employees. The KPI for this was an increase in employee satisfaction and participation in improvement initiatives.
Management Considerations:
The implementation of Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement also required careful management considerations. These included clear communication of the program′s objectives to all stakeholders, continuous monitoring and evaluation of progress, and alignment of the program with the company′s overall strategic goals.
Citations:
The consulting team at XYZ Company drew upon various sources to inform their methodology and recommendations. This included consulting whitepapers such as Implementing Lean Management: Key Strategies for Success by McKinsey & Company, academic business journals such as The Impact of Lean Management Practices on Operational Performance: Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector by R. C. Kant and A. Voss, and market research reports such as Global Continuous Improvement Improvement Market Report 2020-2027 by Grand View Research.
Results:
The implementation of Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement at XYZ Company yielded significant results. Within the first year of implementation, the company achieved a 6% reduction in production costs and a 12% increase in customer satisfaction scores. Employee satisfaction and participation in improvement initiatives also increased, leading to a more positive and proactive organizational culture.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the combination of Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement programs implemented at XYZ Company proved to be a successful approach in achieving significant improvements in operational efficiency, cost reduction, and quality improvement. The program′s top-down approach, employee engagement, and careful management considerations were critical factors in its success. While radical step change programs can yield faster results, continuous change programs like this one can deliver sustainable improvements over the long term.
Are you looking for a way to improve your operations and achieve better results? Look no further than our Programs Implemented in Data Center Knowledge Base.
This comprehensive dataset is packed with 1560 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, and results that will help streamline and optimize your Data Centers.
With a focus on urgency and scope, this knowledge base contains the most important questions to ask in order to get tangible results.
But what makes our Programs Implemented in Data Center dataset stand out from its competitors and alternatives? The answer lies in its professional and comprehensive approach.
This dataset is specifically designed for professionals like yourself, offering a detailed overview of product types and specifications, as well as real-world case studies and use cases.
Not only that, but our product is also affordable and DIY-friendly, making it accessible for businesses of all sizes.
You can easily utilize this knowledge base to improve your Data Centers without breaking the bank.
So, what can you expect when using our Programs Implemented in Data Center dataset? By following the proven principles of Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement, you can expect to see increased efficiency, reduced costs, and improved customer satisfaction.
Plus, with our carefully curated research on Programs Implemented in Data Center, you can trust in the effectiveness and reliability of our product.
Don′t waste any more time or resources on outdated and inefficient Data Centers.
Invest in our Programs Implemented in Data Center Knowledge Base and experience the numerous benefits it has to offer.
From businesses of all sizes to professional individuals, this dataset is a must-have for anyone looking to take their Data Centers to the next level.
Act now and start reaping the rewards of improved processes and results.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1560 prioritized Programs Implemented requirements. - Extensive coverage of 127 Programs Implemented topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 127 Programs Implemented step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 127 Programs Implemented case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: partially offset, Problem Management, Incident Response, Asset Management, Virtual Machines, Integration Testing, IT Operations Management, Manufacturing Best Practices, Operational Innovation, Risk Assessment, SWOT Analysis, Vulnerability Management, Configuration Management, Production Standards, Customer Engagement, Audits Assessments, Continuous Service Improvement, SLA Management, Financial Management, Service efficiency improvement, Process Automation, Long-Term Relationships, Release Deployment Management, Service Availability, Management Systems, Customer Satisfaction, Incident Management, Service Strategy, Procurement Management, Service Comparison, Security Auditing, Service Level, Monitoring Tools, Service Portfolio Management, Service Performance, Resource Optimization, Facility Management, ITSM, IT Service Continuity, Disaster Preparedness, Infrastructure Management, Supply Management, Efficient Operations, Business Process Redesign, Workflow Automation, Customer Service Automation, Inventory Carrying Costs, Service Continuity, Manufacturing Downtime, IT Systems, User Administration, Remote Access, Consumer trends, Change Management, Compensation and Benefits, Regulatory Requirements, Event Management, Data Center, Service Delivery, Service Reporting, Maintenance Tracking, Lifecycle Management, Service Transition, Field Management Software, IT Operation Controls, Service Compliance, Customer Service Optimization, Application Management, Service Optimization, Employee Training, Network Security, Capacity Management, Agreement Reviews, Business Service Management, Data Storage, Access Management, Service Management Processes, Availability Management, Server Management, Problem Resolution, Supplier Management, Programs Implemented, Quality Assurance, IT Cost Management, IT Service Management, Policy Management, New Product Design, Contract Management, IT Budget Allocation, Routing Optimization, Cloud Management, Knowledge Management, Process Implementation, Risk Management, Service Performance Evaluation, Vendor Management, Energy Management, Outsourcing Management, Service Request Fulfillment, Infrastructure Design, Governance Compliance, Backup Recovery Management, Disaster Recovery, Patch Management, Performance Tracking, Creative Direction, Service Desk, Service Integration, Error Control, Technology Adoption Life Cycle, Lean Services, Charging Process, Process Analysis, Business Impact Analysis, IT Governance, Flexible Operations, End User Support, Quality Control, Productivity Measurement, Release Management, Automation Tools, Procedure Documents, Performance Management, Continuous Improvement, Information Technology, Service Catalog, Network Control
Programs Implemented Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Programs Implemented
Lean Management focuses on eliminating waste and maximizing value for the customer. Six Sigma uses data and analysis to minimize defects and variability. Continuous improvement involves making ongoing, incremental changes to improve processes and products. Whether a radical step change or continuous approach is more effective depends on the specific circumstances and goals of the organization.
Lean Management:
- Focuses on eliminating waste and improving efficiency
- Increases productivity and reduces costs in the long term
- Utilizes a systematic approach to problem-solving
Six Sigma:
- Aims for near-perfect processes by reducing defects and variations
- Results in increased quality and customer satisfaction
- Emphasizes data-driven decision making and rigorous analysis
Continuous Improvement:
- Encourages small, incremental changes on a regular basis
- Builds a culture of continuous learning and improvement
- Allows for flexibility and adaptability to changing business needs
Overall benefits:
- Improve service delivery, quality, and customer satisfaction
- Increase efficiency and reduce costs
- Foster a culture of continuous improvement for sustained success
CONTROL QUESTION: Do radical step change improvement programs yield better or faster results than TQM type continuous change programs?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now: Abstract In today’s ever-changing landscape, businesses face significant competition, both domestically and globally, which requires them to continuously challenge and improve their processes in order to remain competitive. Lean management, Six Sigma, and continuous improvement methodologies are all widely used approaches to achieve operational excellence and desired organizational outcomes. However, there is a debate among experts as to whether radical step change improvement programs, such as Lean and Six Sigma, are more effective than continuous improvement programs like Total Quality Management (TQM). In this paper, we will explore the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and propose a big hairy audacious goal for 10 years from now for Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement.
The Debate: Radical Step Change vs. Continuous Change
Radical step change improvement programs, such as Lean and Six Sigma, are based on the idea of making large, rapid improvements in a short period of time. These programs typically involve a top-down approach, where leaders and experts identify areas for improvement and implement structured methodologies to achieve significant cost reductions, increased efficiency, and improved quality. This approach is often seen as a quick fix solution to organizational problems and is associated with dramatic results.
On the other hand, continuous improvement programs like TQM focus on incremental, ongoing improvements to processes, systems, and products. This approach involves empowering employees at all levels to identify and solve problems on a day-to-day basis, using tools and techniques such as root cause analysis, process mapping, and customer feedback. Continuous improvement is seen as a long-term, sustainable approach that promotes a culture of quality and drives overall organizational improvement.
Strengths and Weaknesses
Both radical step change and continuous improvement programs have their own strengths and weaknesses.
Radical step change programs can produce quick and impressive results, which can be appealing to organizations looking for immediate changes. These programs utilize well-defined tools and methodologies, such as Six Sigma′s DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) process, which can provide structure and guidance for improvement projects. However, these programs can be expensive and time-consuming to implement, and can sometimes lead to resistance from employees who feel excluded from the decision-making process.
On the other hand, continuous improvement programs promote a culture of involvement and empowerment, which can result in increased employee engagement and ownership over processes. These programs also often rely on the use of data and customer feedback, allowing for more targeted and sustainable improvements. However, continuous improvement can sometimes be slow and small-scale, and may not achieve the same level of dramatic results as radical step change programs.
The BHAG for Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement
Given the strengths and weaknesses of radical step change and continuous improvement programs, our big hairy audacious goal for 10 years from now for Lean management, Six Sigma, and continuous improvement is to merge the best aspects of both approaches to create a truly transformative and sustainable improvement program.
Specifically, our goal is to develop a methodology, or a hybrid approach, that integrates the rapid improvement methods of Lean and Six Sigma with the long-term, data-driven continuous improvement methods of TQM. This approach would leverage the structured problem-solving techniques and tools of Lean and Six Sigma while promoting a culture of employee involvement and data-based decision-making. It would also focus on creating an ongoing learning and improvement mindset within the organization.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while both radical step change programs and continuous improvement programs have their own strengths and weaknesses, our big hairy audacious goal for 10 years from now is to merge the best aspects of both approaches to create a hybrid methodology that offers the benefits of both approaches. This would enable organizations to achieve rapid, significant improvements while also fostering a sustainable, employee-driven culture of continuous improvement. By 2030, we envision this approach becoming the gold standard for achieving operational excellence and driving continuous improvement in organizations of all sizes and industries.
Customer Testimonials:
"The documentation is clear and concise, making it easy for even beginners to understand and utilize the dataset."
"I`m blown away by the value this dataset provides. The prioritized recommendations are incredibly useful, and the download process was seamless. A must-have for data enthusiasts!"
"I`ve tried other datasets in the past, but none compare to the quality of this one. The prioritized recommendations are not only accurate but also presented in a way that is easy to digest. Highly satisfied!"
Programs Implemented Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Case Study: Lean Management, Six Sigma, Continuous Improvement Implementation at XYZ Company
Client Situation:
XYZ Company is a large multinational organization operating in the manufacturing industry. The company has been facing stiff competition from its competitors due to increased customer demands for higher quality products at lower prices. In order to remain competitive in the market, XYZ Company recognized the need to improve its operational efficiency and reduce waste. The management team at XYZ Company decided to implement a transformational improvement program that would enable the organization to achieve sustainable growth and meet the evolving customer expectations.
Consulting Methodology:
The XYZ Company management team consulted with a leading management consulting firm to design and implement a comprehensive improvement program. After analyzing the current state of the organization, the consulting team recommended a combination of Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement methodology to address the company′s challenges. The methodology included a top-down approach targeting organizational culture, process optimization, and employee engagement.
Deliverables:
The consulting team worked closely with the XYZ Company management team to develop a roadmap for the implementation of Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement. The roadmap outlined the key deliverables and milestones that needed to be achieved throughout the implementation process. These included:
1. Change in Organizational Culture: The transformation program aimed to change the organizational culture from a reactive mindset to a proactive one, promoting continuous improvement in all aspects of the organization.
2. Process Optimization: The consulting team conducted a thorough analysis of the company′s processes, identified bottlenecks, and developed solutions to optimize processes and eliminate waste.
3. Employee Engagement: The success of the transformation program relied heavily on employee engagement and involvement. As such, training programs were developed to equip employees with the necessary skills and knowledge to participate in the improvement initiatives.
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement at XYZ Company was not without its challenges. The major challenges included resistance to change, lack of buy-in from middle management, and limited resources. The consulting team managed these challenges by involving all levels of the organization in the program, providing training and support to employees, and showcasing the benefits of the program through pilot projects.
KPIs:
The success of the transformation program was measured using key performance indicators (KPIs). These included:
1. Cost Reduction: One of the main goals of the program was to reduce costs by eliminating waste and optimizing processes. The KPI for this was a reduction in production costs by 5% within the first year of implementation.
2. Quality Improvement: Another key goal was to improve the quality of products and services delivered to customers. The KPI for this was a 10% increase in customer satisfaction scores within the first year of implementation.
3. Employee Engagement: The success of the program heavily relied on the engagement and involvement of employees. The KPI for this was an increase in employee satisfaction and participation in improvement initiatives.
Management Considerations:
The implementation of Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement also required careful management considerations. These included clear communication of the program′s objectives to all stakeholders, continuous monitoring and evaluation of progress, and alignment of the program with the company′s overall strategic goals.
Citations:
The consulting team at XYZ Company drew upon various sources to inform their methodology and recommendations. This included consulting whitepapers such as Implementing Lean Management: Key Strategies for Success by McKinsey & Company, academic business journals such as The Impact of Lean Management Practices on Operational Performance: Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector by R. C. Kant and A. Voss, and market research reports such as Global Continuous Improvement Improvement Market Report 2020-2027 by Grand View Research.
Results:
The implementation of Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement at XYZ Company yielded significant results. Within the first year of implementation, the company achieved a 6% reduction in production costs and a 12% increase in customer satisfaction scores. Employee satisfaction and participation in improvement initiatives also increased, leading to a more positive and proactive organizational culture.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the combination of Lean Management, Six Sigma, and Continuous Improvement programs implemented at XYZ Company proved to be a successful approach in achieving significant improvements in operational efficiency, cost reduction, and quality improvement. The program′s top-down approach, employee engagement, and careful management considerations were critical factors in its success. While radical step change programs can yield faster results, continuous change programs like this one can deliver sustainable improvements over the long term.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
