Attention all professionals in the purchasing and procurement field!
Are you tired of searching for the right information to effectively manage your Purchase To Pay and Indirect Procurement processes? Look no further, because we have the perfect solution for you.
Introducing our Purchase To Pay and Indirect Procurement Knowledge Base, a comprehensive dataset filled with the most important questions to ask in order to get results based on urgency and scope.
With 1572 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results and real-life case studies/use cases, this is the ultimate tool for any procurement professional.
What makes our dataset stand out from competitors and alternatives? Unlike other generic resources, our Purchase To Pay and Indirect Procurement Knowledge Base is specifically tailored for professionals like you.
It provides in-depth information and solutions for common challenges and issues faced in the field of purchasing and procurement.
But that′s not all.
Our dataset also offers a DIY and affordable alternative to expensive consulting services.
You can now access all the necessary information and expertise at a fraction of the cost, saving both time and money for your business.
Wondering how to effectively use our product? It′s simple.
Our dataset comes with a user-friendly interface and detailed specifications, making it easy to navigate and find exactly what you need.
Plus, our dataset is constantly updated with the latest research and developments in the Purchase To Pay and Indirect Procurement industry, ensuring that you have the most up-to-date information at your fingertips.
Speaking of businesses, our Purchase To Pay and Indirect Procurement Knowledge Base is not only beneficial for professionals, but also for businesses looking to streamline their procurement processes and maximize their ROI.
With a detailed breakdown of costs, pros and cons, and a clear description of what our product does, you will have all the information needed to make an informed decision for your business.
Don′t waste any more time searching for scattered information or spending money on expensive consulting services.
Our Purchase To Pay and Indirect Procurement Knowledge Base has everything you need to effectively manage your procurement processes and achieve successful results.
Get your hands on our dataset today and experience the difference it can make for your business.
Does your organization require approval for expenditures by someone other than the purchaser prior to making payment? Should payment protection be introduced for use cases related to paying for purchase transactions and/or any other use cases? When the facility draws a loan from the credit line to purchase health products, who can the financier count on to pay back the loan?
Purchase To Pay
Purchase To Pay involves obtaining approval for expenditures from someone other than the purchaser before payment is made.
1. Implement an automated purchase to pay system to streamline the approval process and avoid delays.
Benefits: Faster processing, reduced manual errors, greater visibility into spending.
2. Utilize a digital invoice management system to facilitate electronic approval and payment of purchases.
Benefits: Improved efficiency, reduced paper waste, enhanced accuracy.
3. Introduce a standardized purchase order process to ensure all expenditures are properly authorized and tracked.
Benefits: Improved control over spending, increased compliance with company policies.
4. Utilize a spend management platform to track and analyze spend across different categories and suppliers.
Benefits: Better data-driven decision making, improved negotiating power with suppliers.
5. Implement a vendor management system to track vendor performance and ensure compliance with contract terms.
Benefits: Improved supplier relationship management, reduced risk of non-compliance or contract violations.
6. Utilize electronic sourcing tools, such as eRFx and eAuctions, to streamline the bidding and negotiation process.
Benefits: Greater cost savings, increased competition among suppliers, enhanced transparency.
7. Introduce a contract management system to store and track all contracts with suppliers.
Benefits: Improved compliance, easier contract and pricing negotiations, better visibility into contract expiration dates.
8. Utilize a spend analysis tool to identify areas where cost savings can be achieved.
Benefits: More targeted procurement strategies, increased savings opportunities.
9. Introduce a supplier performance measurement system to track and evaluate supplier performance.
Benefits: Improved supplier relationship management, quicker identification and resolution of supplier issues.
10. Utilize a travel and expense management system to streamline and automate the reimbursement process.
Benefits: Increased visibility into employee expenses, reduced administrative burden, potential cost savings.
CONTROL QUESTION: Does the organization require approval for expenditures by someone other than the purchaser prior to making payment?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2030, our organization will have implemented a fully automated and digitized Purchase To Pay process, where all expenditures are approved and verified by artificial intelligence technology. This will eliminate the need for human intervention in the approval process, saving time and resources. Additionally, our organization will be leading the market in terms of ethical and sustainable procurement practices, setting an example for other companies to follow. We will have achieved 100% compliance with all regulatory requirements and have established strong relationships with our suppliers, resulting in cost savings and increased efficiency. With our streamlined Purchase To Pay process, we will be able to focus on strategic partnerships and innovative solutions, driving growth and success for our organization.
"The variety of prioritization methods offered is fantastic. I can tailor the recommendations to my specific needs and goals, which gives me a huge advantage."
Introduction:
Purchase to Pay (P2P) is a crucial business process that involves the entire lifecycle of an organization′s procurement activities, from the initial purchase request to the final payment to the supplier. It is a highly complex and critical process that requires efficient management in order to minimize risks, reduce costs, and improve operational efficiency. One of the key components of P2P is the authorization and approval process for expenditures before making payments to suppliers. In this case study, we will analyze whether an organization requires approval for expenditures by someone other than the purchaser before making payments and its impact on the overall P2P process.
Client Situation:
The client is a global manufacturing company with a presence in multiple countries. The organization has a centralized purchasing department that handles all procurement activities, including vendor management, contract negotiation, and supplier payments. The organization had a decentralized purchase to pay process, which resulted in inefficiencies, delays, and increased costs. The lack of standardization and control in the P2P process led to maverick spending, fraud, and compliance issues. As a result, the management decided to implement a centralized Purchase to Pay process to gain better control and visibility over expenditures.
Consulting Methodology:
In order to understand whether the organization requires approval for expenditures by someone other than the purchaser, our consulting team conducted a thorough analysis of the current P2P process. We followed a 5-step methodology, as follows:
1. Process Documentation: The first step was to document the existing Purchase to Pay process, including the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder, approval requirements, and decision-making authorities. This helped us to identify potential gaps and bottlenecks in the process.
2. Data Collection and Analysis: Our team collected data from multiple sources, including invoices, purchase orders, contracts, and payment records. The data was then analyzed to identify patterns, trends, and anomalies that could indicate any issues with the approval process.
3. Stakeholder Interviews: We conducted interviews with stakeholders involved in the P2P process, including purchasing, finance, and supplier management departments. These interviews provided us with insights into the approval process, its challenges, and potential areas of improvement.
4. Best Practices Research: Our team researched best practices in P2P from academic journals, consulting whitepapers, and market research reports to gain a deeper understanding of the subject matter.
5. Gap Analysis and Recommendations: Based on our analysis and research, we identified gaps and inefficiencies in the approval process and provided recommendations to improve the overall P2P process.
Deliverables:
1. Current Purchase to Pay Process Documentation
2. Data Analysis Report
3. Stakeholder Interview Findings
4. Best Practices Research Report
5. Gap Analysis and Recommendations Document
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of a centralized P2P process had several challenges, including resistance to change, lack of proper systems and controls, and cultural differences across regions. One of the significant challenges was to ensure compliance with local regulations and laws while implementing a global P2P process. Another challenge was to set up an efficient and reliable approval workflow that would minimize delays and bottlenecks.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
Following are the key performance indicators that were used to measure the success of our recommendations:
1. Number of touchpoints/steps in the approval process
2. Time taken for approval of an expenditure
3. Percentage of non-compliant purchases
4. Percentage of maverick spend
5. Cost savings achieved due to streamlined approval process
6. Audit findings related to P2P process
7. Percentage of on-time and error-free payments to suppliers
Management Considerations:
The management had some key considerations before implementing our recommendations. These included:
1. Resistance to Change: The implementation of a centralized P2P process required significant changes in the organization’s culture and processes. The management had to ensure effective change management practices to minimize resistance and maximize adoption.
2. Technology Adoption: The centralization of P2P required investing in technology, including an e-procurement system, document management system, and workflow automation tool. The management had to ensure that these technologies were aligned with their business objectives and integrated well with existing systems.
3. Culture and People: The management had to consider the cultural differences across regions where the organization operated and ensure that the recommendations were tailored to suit local requirements. Additionally, training and communication programs had to be developed to educate employees on the new process and obtain buy-in.
Conclusion:
After a thorough analysis of the P2P process and research on best practices, it was found that the organization does require approval for expenditures by someone other than the purchaser prior to making payments. The lack of proper control and oversight can result in increased risks, delays, and compliance issues. Therefore, implementing a centralized P2P process with a streamlined approval workflow is crucial for better control, compliance, and cost savings. The success of the implementation depends on effective change management, technology adoption, and cultural considerations. Our recommendations aim to improve the P2P process and enable the organization to achieve its business objectives efficiently.
Are you tired of searching for the right information to effectively manage your Purchase To Pay and Indirect Procurement processes? Look no further, because we have the perfect solution for you.
Introducing our Purchase To Pay and Indirect Procurement Knowledge Base, a comprehensive dataset filled with the most important questions to ask in order to get results based on urgency and scope.
With 1572 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results and real-life case studies/use cases, this is the ultimate tool for any procurement professional.
What makes our dataset stand out from competitors and alternatives? Unlike other generic resources, our Purchase To Pay and Indirect Procurement Knowledge Base is specifically tailored for professionals like you.
It provides in-depth information and solutions for common challenges and issues faced in the field of purchasing and procurement.
But that′s not all.
Our dataset also offers a DIY and affordable alternative to expensive consulting services.
You can now access all the necessary information and expertise at a fraction of the cost, saving both time and money for your business.
Wondering how to effectively use our product? It′s simple.
Our dataset comes with a user-friendly interface and detailed specifications, making it easy to navigate and find exactly what you need.
Plus, our dataset is constantly updated with the latest research and developments in the Purchase To Pay and Indirect Procurement industry, ensuring that you have the most up-to-date information at your fingertips.
Speaking of businesses, our Purchase To Pay and Indirect Procurement Knowledge Base is not only beneficial for professionals, but also for businesses looking to streamline their procurement processes and maximize their ROI.
With a detailed breakdown of costs, pros and cons, and a clear description of what our product does, you will have all the information needed to make an informed decision for your business.
Don′t waste any more time searching for scattered information or spending money on expensive consulting services.
Our Purchase To Pay and Indirect Procurement Knowledge Base has everything you need to effectively manage your procurement processes and achieve successful results.
Get your hands on our dataset today and experience the difference it can make for your business.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1572 prioritized Purchase To Pay requirements. - Extensive coverage of 229 Purchase To Pay topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 229 Purchase To Pay step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 229 Purchase To Pay case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: RFP Management, Cost Containment, Contracts Administration, Supplier Consolidation, Strategic Sourcing Implementation, Sourcing Strategy, Procurement Metrics, Supplier Audits, Sourcing Process, Procurement Analytics, Category Strategy, Electronic Invoicing, Supplier Performance Tracking, Global Sourcing, Procurement Best Practices, Low Cost Country Sourcing, Supplier Information Management, Sourcing Models, Sourcing Governance, Supplier Management System, Supply Market Analysis, Invoice Automation, Supplier Feedback, Supplier Relationships, RFQ Process, Outsourcing Strategy, Indirect Procurement, Strategic Sourcing, Sourcing Events, Procurement Success, Expense Management, Sourcing Effectiveness, Category Management, Change Management, Procurement Technology, Business Process Outsourcing, Environmental Impact, Sourcing Intelligence, Procurement Outsourcing, Supplier Portals, Supplier Benchmarking, EDI Implementation, Market Intelligence, Supplier Compliance, Vendor Selection Process, Supplier Performance Management, Spend Under Management, Strategic Partnerships, Procurement Excellence, Procurement And Contracts, Operating Margins, Supplier Segmentation, Project Management For Procurement, Procurement Operations, Market Trends, Technology Strategies, Cost Savings, Invoice Reconciliation, Supplier Monitoring, Sourcing Strategy Implementation, Procurement Consulting, Procurement Goals, Spend Analysis Tools, Supplier Contracts, Procurement Benchmarking, Finance And Procurement Alignment, Category Management Process, Quality Control, Value Analysis, Sourcing Analytics, Site Interpretation, Sourcing Partnerships, Procurement Training, Procurement Performance, Strategic Sourcing Plans, Purchase To Pay, Contract Lifecycle Management, Purchase Requisitions, Supplier Evaluation, Supplier Collaboration, Purchase To Pay Process, Leveraging Technology, Transaction Processing, Inventory Management, Supplier Quality, Vendor Performance Management, Procurement Service Level Agreements, Spend Management, Tail Spend, Supplier Partnerships, Purchasing Strategies, Procurement Communication, Outsourcing Solutions, Supply Chain, Purchase Orders, Procurement Reporting, Invoice Validation, Procurement Contracts Management, Procurement Regulations, Procurement Compliance Management, Market Intelligence Tools, Supplier Market Analysis, Supplier Performance, ERP Procurement Department, Indirect Sourcing and Procurement BPO, Supply Chain Risk Management, Procurement Network, Supplier Surveys, Supply Base Management, Procure To Pay Process, Grid Flexibility, Supplier Databases, Spend Analysis, Travel Procurement, Procurement Policy, Supplier Data Management, Contract Management, Supplier Scorecards, Supplier Negotiations, Savings Tracking, Sourcing Evaluation, Procurement Guidelines, Invoice Verification, Contract Negotiation, Sourcing And Procurement Integration, Procurement Governance, Procurement Efficiency, Risk Management Strategies, Procurement Optimization, Procurement Risk Management, Procurement Software, Service Delivery, Electronic Ordering, Control System Engineering, Supplier Relationships Management, Supplier Performance Scorecards, Benchmarking Analysis, Accounts Payable, Global Procurement, Contract Administration, Procurement Systems, Management Systems, Invoice Exceptions, Contract Review, Procurement Lifecycle, Demand Planning, Procurement Process, Invoice Management, Supplier Onboarding, Vendor Evaluation, Vendor Management Software, Procurement Process Improvement, Cost Reduction, Price Analysis, Supplier Quality Management, Supplier Risk, Dynamic Sourcing, Sourcing Optimization, Procurement Ethics, Supplier Assessment, Business Process Redesign, Performance Metrics, Outsourcing Services, BPO Outsourcing, Supplier Identification, Spend Consolidation, Outsourcing Providers, Spend Visibility, Procurement Audits, Incubator Programs, Procurement Budget, Contract Negotiation Process, Supplier Diversity, Tail Spend Analysis, Management Reporting, Supply Chain Optimization, External Spend Management, Sourcing Solutions, Electronic Invoice Processing, Sustainable Sourcing, Vendor Management, Supplier Negotiation, Managed Spend, Procurement Automation, Procurement Maturity, Commodity Procurement, Invoice Processing Services, Automated Procurement, Negotiation Skills, Data Management, Sourcing Policies, Innovation Procurement, IT Staffing, Cost Optimization, Procurement Audit, Procurement Strategy, Reverse Auction, Indirect Spend Management, Procurement Transformation Strategy, Professional Development, Supplier Communication, Sourcing Strategy Development, Procurement Governance Framework, Sourcing Tools, Expense Management System, RFx Process, Contract Terms, Sustainable Procurement, Contract Compliance, Indirect Cost Reduction, Supplier Onboarding Process, Procurement Policies, Procurement Transformation, Total Cost Of Ownership, Supplier Performance Improvement, Printing Procurement, Sourcing Insights, Corporate Social Responsibility Goals, Total Productive Maintenance, Spend Analysis Software, Supplier Collaboration Tools, Vendor Risk Assessment, Sourcing Platforms, Supplier Due Diligence, Invoice Processing, Sourcing Efficiency, Compliance Management, Supplier Relationship Optimization, Spending Control
Purchase To Pay Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Purchase To Pay
Purchase To Pay involves obtaining approval for expenditures from someone other than the purchaser before payment is made.
1. Implement an automated purchase to pay system to streamline the approval process and avoid delays.
Benefits: Faster processing, reduced manual errors, greater visibility into spending.
2. Utilize a digital invoice management system to facilitate electronic approval and payment of purchases.
Benefits: Improved efficiency, reduced paper waste, enhanced accuracy.
3. Introduce a standardized purchase order process to ensure all expenditures are properly authorized and tracked.
Benefits: Improved control over spending, increased compliance with company policies.
4. Utilize a spend management platform to track and analyze spend across different categories and suppliers.
Benefits: Better data-driven decision making, improved negotiating power with suppliers.
5. Implement a vendor management system to track vendor performance and ensure compliance with contract terms.
Benefits: Improved supplier relationship management, reduced risk of non-compliance or contract violations.
6. Utilize electronic sourcing tools, such as eRFx and eAuctions, to streamline the bidding and negotiation process.
Benefits: Greater cost savings, increased competition among suppliers, enhanced transparency.
7. Introduce a contract management system to store and track all contracts with suppliers.
Benefits: Improved compliance, easier contract and pricing negotiations, better visibility into contract expiration dates.
8. Utilize a spend analysis tool to identify areas where cost savings can be achieved.
Benefits: More targeted procurement strategies, increased savings opportunities.
9. Introduce a supplier performance measurement system to track and evaluate supplier performance.
Benefits: Improved supplier relationship management, quicker identification and resolution of supplier issues.
10. Utilize a travel and expense management system to streamline and automate the reimbursement process.
Benefits: Increased visibility into employee expenses, reduced administrative burden, potential cost savings.
CONTROL QUESTION: Does the organization require approval for expenditures by someone other than the purchaser prior to making payment?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2030, our organization will have implemented a fully automated and digitized Purchase To Pay process, where all expenditures are approved and verified by artificial intelligence technology. This will eliminate the need for human intervention in the approval process, saving time and resources. Additionally, our organization will be leading the market in terms of ethical and sustainable procurement practices, setting an example for other companies to follow. We will have achieved 100% compliance with all regulatory requirements and have established strong relationships with our suppliers, resulting in cost savings and increased efficiency. With our streamlined Purchase To Pay process, we will be able to focus on strategic partnerships and innovative solutions, driving growth and success for our organization.
Customer Testimonials:
"The variety of prioritization methods offered is fantastic. I can tailor the recommendations to my specific needs and goals, which gives me a huge advantage."
"This dataset is a game-changer! It`s comprehensive, well-organized, and saved me hours of data collection. Highly recommend!"
"The personalized recommendations have helped me attract more qualified leads and improve my engagement rates. My content is now resonating with my audience like never before."
Purchase To Pay Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Introduction:
Purchase to Pay (P2P) is a crucial business process that involves the entire lifecycle of an organization′s procurement activities, from the initial purchase request to the final payment to the supplier. It is a highly complex and critical process that requires efficient management in order to minimize risks, reduce costs, and improve operational efficiency. One of the key components of P2P is the authorization and approval process for expenditures before making payments to suppliers. In this case study, we will analyze whether an organization requires approval for expenditures by someone other than the purchaser before making payments and its impact on the overall P2P process.
Client Situation:
The client is a global manufacturing company with a presence in multiple countries. The organization has a centralized purchasing department that handles all procurement activities, including vendor management, contract negotiation, and supplier payments. The organization had a decentralized purchase to pay process, which resulted in inefficiencies, delays, and increased costs. The lack of standardization and control in the P2P process led to maverick spending, fraud, and compliance issues. As a result, the management decided to implement a centralized Purchase to Pay process to gain better control and visibility over expenditures.
Consulting Methodology:
In order to understand whether the organization requires approval for expenditures by someone other than the purchaser, our consulting team conducted a thorough analysis of the current P2P process. We followed a 5-step methodology, as follows:
1. Process Documentation: The first step was to document the existing Purchase to Pay process, including the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder, approval requirements, and decision-making authorities. This helped us to identify potential gaps and bottlenecks in the process.
2. Data Collection and Analysis: Our team collected data from multiple sources, including invoices, purchase orders, contracts, and payment records. The data was then analyzed to identify patterns, trends, and anomalies that could indicate any issues with the approval process.
3. Stakeholder Interviews: We conducted interviews with stakeholders involved in the P2P process, including purchasing, finance, and supplier management departments. These interviews provided us with insights into the approval process, its challenges, and potential areas of improvement.
4. Best Practices Research: Our team researched best practices in P2P from academic journals, consulting whitepapers, and market research reports to gain a deeper understanding of the subject matter.
5. Gap Analysis and Recommendations: Based on our analysis and research, we identified gaps and inefficiencies in the approval process and provided recommendations to improve the overall P2P process.
Deliverables:
1. Current Purchase to Pay Process Documentation
2. Data Analysis Report
3. Stakeholder Interview Findings
4. Best Practices Research Report
5. Gap Analysis and Recommendations Document
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of a centralized P2P process had several challenges, including resistance to change, lack of proper systems and controls, and cultural differences across regions. One of the significant challenges was to ensure compliance with local regulations and laws while implementing a global P2P process. Another challenge was to set up an efficient and reliable approval workflow that would minimize delays and bottlenecks.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
Following are the key performance indicators that were used to measure the success of our recommendations:
1. Number of touchpoints/steps in the approval process
2. Time taken for approval of an expenditure
3. Percentage of non-compliant purchases
4. Percentage of maverick spend
5. Cost savings achieved due to streamlined approval process
6. Audit findings related to P2P process
7. Percentage of on-time and error-free payments to suppliers
Management Considerations:
The management had some key considerations before implementing our recommendations. These included:
1. Resistance to Change: The implementation of a centralized P2P process required significant changes in the organization’s culture and processes. The management had to ensure effective change management practices to minimize resistance and maximize adoption.
2. Technology Adoption: The centralization of P2P required investing in technology, including an e-procurement system, document management system, and workflow automation tool. The management had to ensure that these technologies were aligned with their business objectives and integrated well with existing systems.
3. Culture and People: The management had to consider the cultural differences across regions where the organization operated and ensure that the recommendations were tailored to suit local requirements. Additionally, training and communication programs had to be developed to educate employees on the new process and obtain buy-in.
Conclusion:
After a thorough analysis of the P2P process and research on best practices, it was found that the organization does require approval for expenditures by someone other than the purchaser prior to making payments. The lack of proper control and oversight can result in increased risks, delays, and compliance issues. Therefore, implementing a centralized P2P process with a streamlined approval workflow is crucial for better control, compliance, and cost savings. The success of the implementation depends on effective change management, technology adoption, and cultural considerations. Our recommendations aim to improve the P2P process and enable the organization to achieve its business objectives efficiently.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
