Attention all IT professionals!
Are you tired of spending hours trying to gather and analyze data for your SLA reports and metrics? Look no further, our SLA Reports and Metrics in ITSM Knowledge Base is here to save the day.
Our dataset includes 1532 prioritized requirements and solutions for SLA Reports and Metrics in ITSM.
We know time is of the essence when it comes to managing SLAs, which is why we have also included questions categorized by urgency and scope to guarantee quick and accurate results.
But that′s not all, our dataset also offers a wide range of benefits for its users.
From streamlining processes and improving efficiency to ensuring compliance and maximizing customer satisfaction, our SLA Reports and Metrics bring tangible results to your ITSM operations.
Still not convinced? Let our numerous example case studies and use cases speak for themselves.
Our dataset has been proven to outperform competitors and alternatives when it comes to providing valuable insights and actionable data for SLA management.
Not only is our product designed specifically for professionals in the IT field, but it is also user-friendly and affordable.
With easy access to product type, specifications, and detailed overviews, you can quickly integrate our dataset into your SLA processes without breaking the bank.
And the best part? Our product is backed by thorough research on SLA Reports and Metrics in ITSM, making it a reliable and trustworthy resource for businesses of all sizes.
We understand that weighing the cost and benefits of a product is crucial in any purchasing decision.
That′s why we offer a competitive price for our dataset, ensuring a high return on investment and minimizing risks for your business.
So why wait? Invest in our SLA Reports and Metrics in ITSM Knowledge Base today and experience the power of streamlined and efficient SLA management.
Say goodbye to manual data collection and hello to effortless and accurate insights.
Don′t miss out on this opportunity to elevate your ITSM operations.
Order now and see the results for yourself!
Are periodic reports from the service provider based on the key areas agreed in the SLA?
SLA Reports
SLA reports are service provider reports that outline performance in key areas agreed upon in the service level agreement.
1. SLA reports allow for monitoring and tracking of service provider performance to ensure compliance with agreed-upon metrics.
2. They provide visibility into the status of services and help identify any areas of improvement or potential issues.
3. This helps build trust and transparency between the service provider and the customer.
4. Regular SLA reports can also facilitate discussions on service level improvements and adjustments.
5. The reports can be used as evidence in case of any disputes or negotiations regarding service delivery.
6. By analyzing SLA reports, ITSM teams can identify patterns or trends in service performance and make data-driven decisions for process improvement.
7. The reports also aid in reviewing and validating the effectiveness of the SLAs and identifying any gaps or discrepancies.
8. SLA reports can serve as a communication tool between the service provider and customers, keeping them informed about service levels and any changes or updates.
9. Service Level Managers can use SLA reports to present a comprehensive overview of service performance to senior management and other stakeholders.
10. Ultimately, SLA reports help ensure that service levels are consistently met and support the overall goal of delivering high-quality services to customers.
CONTROL QUESTION: Are periodic reports from the service provider based on the key areas agreed in the SLA?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2030, SLA Reports will be the leading provider for customized, real-time reports on service level agreements. Our goal is to revolutionize the reporting process for businesses by offering innovative and comprehensive reports that go beyond the basic measures of uptime and downtime.
Our SLA Reports will provide detailed insights into the service provider′s performance in all key areas agreed upon in the SLA. This includes response time, resolution time, overall system availability, data security, and customer satisfaction. We will also incorporate data analytics and artificial intelligence to accurately forecast potential issues and make proactive recommendations for improvement.
Our team will continually strive to enhance our reporting capabilities by leveraging emerging technologies and constantly seeking feedback from our clients. We envision SLA Reports becoming an essential tool for businesses to track and optimize their service level agreements, leading to increased efficiency, cost savings, and strengthened partnerships with service providers.
As the global demand for reliable and transparent reporting increases, we aim to be the go-to solution for businesses of all sizes and industries. Our ultimate goal is to set a new standard for SLA reporting and become the trusted partner for businesses striving for exceptional service levels.
"I`ve tried several datasets before, but this one stands out. The prioritized recommendations are not only accurate but also easy to interpret. A fantastic resource for data-driven decision-makers!"
Case Study: SLA Reports - Examining the Adherence to Key Areas in a Service Level Agreement
Synopsis:
XYZ Corporation (client) is a large financial institution operating in the Asia-Pacific region. The client provides a wide range of banking services, including personal and business banking, wealth management, and investment services. With a vast customer base and a highly competitive market, the client understands the importance of providing high-quality services to maintain customer satisfaction and attract new customers.
To ensure the delivery of high-quality services, the client has partnered with multiple service providers for various IT services such as network infrastructure, data center management, and software development. These service providers have signed Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with the client, which outline the scope, responsibilities, and expected levels of service for each service provided. These SLAs also include key performance indicators (KPIs) and penalties for not meeting the agreed-upon service levels.
The client has been receiving periodic reports from their service providers, which are supposed to provide an overview of the performance and adherence to the agreed-upon SLAs. However, concerns have been raised about the accuracy and completeness of these reports, leading the client to question if the service providers are truly meeting the key areas outlined in the SLAs. Therefore, the client has engaged our consulting firm to conduct an in-depth analysis and answer the question: Are the periodic reports from the service provider based on the key areas agreed in the SLA?
Consulting Methodology:
Our consulting methodology involves a multi-stage process that includes data collection, analysis, and recommendations. The following are the steps taken in this case study:
1. Data Collection: We started by collecting all the existing SLAs signed between the client and its service providers. This included reviewing the SLAs for each service provided, the agreed-upon service levels, KPIs, and penalties for non-compliance.
2. Review of Periodic Reports: A thorough review of the periodic reports provided by the service providers was conducted. We examined the accuracy and completeness of the data presented in these reports, as well as the extent to which the key areas agreed upon in the SLAs were covered.
3. Interviews: In-depth interviews were conducted with key stakeholders from both the client and service providers. These interviews aimed to gather insights into how the SLAs were being managed, any challenges faced, and their perceptions on the adherence to key areas outlined in the SLAs.
4. Data Analysis: The data collected from the SLAs, periodic reports, and interviews were analyzed to identify any discrepancies or trends.
5. Site Visit: We conducted site visits to select service provider locations to observe their processes and assess their adherence to the SLAs.
6. Comparison with Industry Standards: The performance levels outlined in the SLAs were compared with industry standards and best practices to determine if they were realistic and achievable.
7. Recommendations: Based on our analysis and findings, we provided recommendations to the client on ways to improve the management of SLAs and ensure the effective implementation of the agreed-upon service levels.
Deliverables:
The following deliverables were provided to the client:
1. Detailed report on the current state of SLA management, including an analysis of the SLAs, periodic reports, and interviews with stakeholders.
2. Presentation of findings and recommendations to key stakeholders within the client organization.
3. Implementation plan and guidelines for improving the management of SLAs and ensuring adherence to key areas in the SLAs.
Implementation Challenges:
During our analysis, we encountered several challenges that could potentially affect the effectiveness of the SLAs and the delivery of high-quality services. These challenges included:
1. Lack of Clear and Measurable KPIs: Some of the SLAs did not have clearly defined and measurable KPIs, making it difficult to assess the performance levels of the service providers accurately.
2. Limited Transparency: The client had limited visibility into the internal processes of their service providers, which made it challenging to determine if the reported data was accurate.
3. Inadequate Performance Tracking Mechanisms: The client did not have a robust system in place to monitor and track the performance levels of the service providers against the agreed-upon SLAs.
KPIs:
The following are the key performance indicators identified in the SLAs:
1. Uptime/Availability: This measures the percentage of time that the services provided by the service provider are available to the client.
2. Response Time: This measures the time taken for the service provider to respond to any issues or requests raised by the client.
3. Resolution Time: This measures the time taken by the service provider to resolve any issues or requests raised by the client.
4. Quality of Service: This measures the overall quality of service provided by the service provider, as determined by the client.
Management Considerations:
Based on our analysis and recommendations, the following are the key management considerations for the client to ensure the effective implementation of SLAs:
1. Clearly defined and measurable KPIs: The SLAs should have clearly defined and measurable KPIs to track the performance levels of the service providers accurately.
2. Regular monitoring and reporting: The client should establish a robust system to regularly monitor and track the performance levels of its service providers against the agreed-upon SLAs. This will ensure timely intervention in case of any discrepancies.
3. Enhanced Communication and Transparent Reporting: Communication channels between the client and service providers should be improved to facilitate transparent reporting and better collaboration.
Conclusion:
Through our analysis, we found that the periodic reports from the service providers were not accurately reflecting their performance levels in meeting the key areas outlined in the SLAs. While the service providers were meeting some of the KPIs, there were discrepancies in meeting others. The challenges identified in our analysis could potentially hinder the effectiveness of the SLAs. Therefore, we recommended that the client take steps to address these challenges and implement a more robust SLA management framework to ensure the delivery of high-quality services by its service providers.
References:
1. Hiatt, J., & Associates. (2006). How do you develop good SLAs? Retrieved from https://www.thoughtworks.com/insights/blog/managing-agreement-how-do-you-develop-good-slas
2. Burt, D. (2013). Service Level Agreements: Essentials for managing IT. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 12, 302-318.
3. Huang, G. (2018). Establishing Service Level Agreements with Third Party Providers. Information Management, 25(5), 15-18.
Are you tired of spending hours trying to gather and analyze data for your SLA reports and metrics? Look no further, our SLA Reports and Metrics in ITSM Knowledge Base is here to save the day.
Our dataset includes 1532 prioritized requirements and solutions for SLA Reports and Metrics in ITSM.
We know time is of the essence when it comes to managing SLAs, which is why we have also included questions categorized by urgency and scope to guarantee quick and accurate results.
But that′s not all, our dataset also offers a wide range of benefits for its users.
From streamlining processes and improving efficiency to ensuring compliance and maximizing customer satisfaction, our SLA Reports and Metrics bring tangible results to your ITSM operations.
Still not convinced? Let our numerous example case studies and use cases speak for themselves.
Our dataset has been proven to outperform competitors and alternatives when it comes to providing valuable insights and actionable data for SLA management.
Not only is our product designed specifically for professionals in the IT field, but it is also user-friendly and affordable.
With easy access to product type, specifications, and detailed overviews, you can quickly integrate our dataset into your SLA processes without breaking the bank.
And the best part? Our product is backed by thorough research on SLA Reports and Metrics in ITSM, making it a reliable and trustworthy resource for businesses of all sizes.
We understand that weighing the cost and benefits of a product is crucial in any purchasing decision.
That′s why we offer a competitive price for our dataset, ensuring a high return on investment and minimizing risks for your business.
So why wait? Invest in our SLA Reports and Metrics in ITSM Knowledge Base today and experience the power of streamlined and efficient SLA management.
Say goodbye to manual data collection and hello to effortless and accurate insights.
Don′t miss out on this opportunity to elevate your ITSM operations.
Order now and see the results for yourself!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1532 prioritized SLA Reports requirements. - Extensive coverage of 185 SLA Reports topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 185 SLA Reports step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 185 SLA Reports case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: SLA Non Compliance, Change Approval, Standardized Processes, Incident Priority, Incident Trends, ITSM Performance, SLA Performance, Problem Identification, Service Level Targets, Incident Escalations, Escalation Procedures, Quality Assurance, Incident Communication, Innovation Metrics, Customer Feedback, Escalation Management, IT Service Availability, User Experience, IT Service Maturity, IT Service Delivery Standards, Real Time Dashboards, Demand Variability, Cost Efficiency, Service performance measurement metrics, ITIL Processes, Incident Response Process, Incident Trending, Escalation Protocols, Accountability Systems, Integration Challenges, Service Disruption, Team Performance Metrics, Business Criticality, IT Operations, Measurable Results, SLA Reports, IT Service Cost, Response And Resolution Time, Incident Severity, Supplier Relationships, Key Performance Indicator, SLA Adherence, Application Uptime, Audit Preparation, IT Performance Dashboards, Leading Indicators, Service Speed, User Satisfaction, Recovery Time, Incident Response Efficiency, Problem Categorization, Compliance Metrics, Automation Solutions, Customer Complaint Handling, Monitoring The Quality Level, SLA Breaches, Availability Management, Capacity Management, Target Operating Model, Incident Management Process, Performance Metrics, Incident Categorization, Problem Resolution, Service Metrics, Incident Tracking System, Operational Metrics, Operational KPIs, Metric Tracking, Vendor Management, Change Impact Assessment, Service Continuity, Incident Impact, Incident Management Tools, Decision Support, customer loyalty program, Symptom Analysis, SLA Reporting, Service Desk Effectiveness, System Outages, IT Service Capacity, SLA Metrics in ITSM, Incident Identification, Problem Management, SLA Compliance, customer effort level, Utilization Tracking, Cost Analysis, IT Service Efficiency, Incident Tracking Tool, SLA Review, Safety Metrics, Error Rate, Incident Handling, Performance Monitoring, Customer Satisfaction, Incident Closure Process, Incident Response Time, Incident Response, Service Level Agreements, Error Handling, ITSM, Customer Service KPIs, SLM Service Level Management, IT Service Resilience, Secure Data Lifecycle, Incident Aging, Service Request Resolution, Problem Analysis, Service Downtime, Process Optimization, Revenue Metrics, Pricing Metrics, Incident Classification, Capacity Planning, Technical Support, customer journey stages, Continuous Improvement, Server Uptime, IT Service Objectives, Incident Ownership, Severity Levels, Incident Assignment, Incident Response Team, Incident Resolution Process, Outage Notification, Service Delivery, SLA Monitoring, Incident Management, Efficiency Metrics, Problem Escalation, Mean Time Between Failures, Critical Incident, Effectiveness Evaluation, Service Desk Efficiency, Service Desk Metrics, Change Management, Profit Per Employee, Downtime Reduction, Root Cause Resolution, Compliance Cost, IT Service Security, Incident Correlation, ITIL Framework, Response Rate, Ticket Management, Incident Resolution, Data Analysis, Response Time, Incident Documentation, Gap Analysis, Incident Categorization And Prioritization, Impact Analysis, Online Customer Experience, Metrics Measurement, Operational Transparency, Service Tickets, Service Improvement, Work Load Management, Resource Allocation, Service Response Time, Service Availability, Organizational Level, Background Check Services, Review Metrics, Incident Prioritization, Incident Frequency, Incident Severity Levels, Incident Response Rate, Trend Analysis, Root Cause Analysis, Service Interruption, ITSM Best Practices, Business Impact, Incident Delay, IT Service Delivery, Ticket Resolution, Downtime Cost, Cybersecurity Metrics, SLA Metrics, IT Service Level, Incident Resolution Time, Service Performance, Executive Compensation, SLA Tracking, Uptime Percentage
SLA Reports Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
SLA Reports
SLA reports are service provider reports that outline performance in key areas agreed upon in the service level agreement.
1. SLA reports allow for monitoring and tracking of service provider performance to ensure compliance with agreed-upon metrics.
2. They provide visibility into the status of services and help identify any areas of improvement or potential issues.
3. This helps build trust and transparency between the service provider and the customer.
4. Regular SLA reports can also facilitate discussions on service level improvements and adjustments.
5. The reports can be used as evidence in case of any disputes or negotiations regarding service delivery.
6. By analyzing SLA reports, ITSM teams can identify patterns or trends in service performance and make data-driven decisions for process improvement.
7. The reports also aid in reviewing and validating the effectiveness of the SLAs and identifying any gaps or discrepancies.
8. SLA reports can serve as a communication tool between the service provider and customers, keeping them informed about service levels and any changes or updates.
9. Service Level Managers can use SLA reports to present a comprehensive overview of service performance to senior management and other stakeholders.
10. Ultimately, SLA reports help ensure that service levels are consistently met and support the overall goal of delivering high-quality services to customers.
CONTROL QUESTION: Are periodic reports from the service provider based on the key areas agreed in the SLA?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
By 2030, SLA Reports will be the leading provider for customized, real-time reports on service level agreements. Our goal is to revolutionize the reporting process for businesses by offering innovative and comprehensive reports that go beyond the basic measures of uptime and downtime.
Our SLA Reports will provide detailed insights into the service provider′s performance in all key areas agreed upon in the SLA. This includes response time, resolution time, overall system availability, data security, and customer satisfaction. We will also incorporate data analytics and artificial intelligence to accurately forecast potential issues and make proactive recommendations for improvement.
Our team will continually strive to enhance our reporting capabilities by leveraging emerging technologies and constantly seeking feedback from our clients. We envision SLA Reports becoming an essential tool for businesses to track and optimize their service level agreements, leading to increased efficiency, cost savings, and strengthened partnerships with service providers.
As the global demand for reliable and transparent reporting increases, we aim to be the go-to solution for businesses of all sizes and industries. Our ultimate goal is to set a new standard for SLA reporting and become the trusted partner for businesses striving for exceptional service levels.
Customer Testimonials:
"I`ve tried several datasets before, but this one stands out. The prioritized recommendations are not only accurate but also easy to interpret. A fantastic resource for data-driven decision-makers!"
"The creators of this dataset deserve applause! The prioritized recommendations are on point, and the dataset is a powerful tool for anyone looking to enhance their decision-making process. Bravo!"
"Thank you for creating this amazing resource. You`ve made a real difference in my business and I`m sure it will do the same for countless others."
SLA Reports Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Case Study: SLA Reports - Examining the Adherence to Key Areas in a Service Level Agreement
Synopsis:
XYZ Corporation (client) is a large financial institution operating in the Asia-Pacific region. The client provides a wide range of banking services, including personal and business banking, wealth management, and investment services. With a vast customer base and a highly competitive market, the client understands the importance of providing high-quality services to maintain customer satisfaction and attract new customers.
To ensure the delivery of high-quality services, the client has partnered with multiple service providers for various IT services such as network infrastructure, data center management, and software development. These service providers have signed Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with the client, which outline the scope, responsibilities, and expected levels of service for each service provided. These SLAs also include key performance indicators (KPIs) and penalties for not meeting the agreed-upon service levels.
The client has been receiving periodic reports from their service providers, which are supposed to provide an overview of the performance and adherence to the agreed-upon SLAs. However, concerns have been raised about the accuracy and completeness of these reports, leading the client to question if the service providers are truly meeting the key areas outlined in the SLAs. Therefore, the client has engaged our consulting firm to conduct an in-depth analysis and answer the question: Are the periodic reports from the service provider based on the key areas agreed in the SLA?
Consulting Methodology:
Our consulting methodology involves a multi-stage process that includes data collection, analysis, and recommendations. The following are the steps taken in this case study:
1. Data Collection: We started by collecting all the existing SLAs signed between the client and its service providers. This included reviewing the SLAs for each service provided, the agreed-upon service levels, KPIs, and penalties for non-compliance.
2. Review of Periodic Reports: A thorough review of the periodic reports provided by the service providers was conducted. We examined the accuracy and completeness of the data presented in these reports, as well as the extent to which the key areas agreed upon in the SLAs were covered.
3. Interviews: In-depth interviews were conducted with key stakeholders from both the client and service providers. These interviews aimed to gather insights into how the SLAs were being managed, any challenges faced, and their perceptions on the adherence to key areas outlined in the SLAs.
4. Data Analysis: The data collected from the SLAs, periodic reports, and interviews were analyzed to identify any discrepancies or trends.
5. Site Visit: We conducted site visits to select service provider locations to observe their processes and assess their adherence to the SLAs.
6. Comparison with Industry Standards: The performance levels outlined in the SLAs were compared with industry standards and best practices to determine if they were realistic and achievable.
7. Recommendations: Based on our analysis and findings, we provided recommendations to the client on ways to improve the management of SLAs and ensure the effective implementation of the agreed-upon service levels.
Deliverables:
The following deliverables were provided to the client:
1. Detailed report on the current state of SLA management, including an analysis of the SLAs, periodic reports, and interviews with stakeholders.
2. Presentation of findings and recommendations to key stakeholders within the client organization.
3. Implementation plan and guidelines for improving the management of SLAs and ensuring adherence to key areas in the SLAs.
Implementation Challenges:
During our analysis, we encountered several challenges that could potentially affect the effectiveness of the SLAs and the delivery of high-quality services. These challenges included:
1. Lack of Clear and Measurable KPIs: Some of the SLAs did not have clearly defined and measurable KPIs, making it difficult to assess the performance levels of the service providers accurately.
2. Limited Transparency: The client had limited visibility into the internal processes of their service providers, which made it challenging to determine if the reported data was accurate.
3. Inadequate Performance Tracking Mechanisms: The client did not have a robust system in place to monitor and track the performance levels of the service providers against the agreed-upon SLAs.
KPIs:
The following are the key performance indicators identified in the SLAs:
1. Uptime/Availability: This measures the percentage of time that the services provided by the service provider are available to the client.
2. Response Time: This measures the time taken for the service provider to respond to any issues or requests raised by the client.
3. Resolution Time: This measures the time taken by the service provider to resolve any issues or requests raised by the client.
4. Quality of Service: This measures the overall quality of service provided by the service provider, as determined by the client.
Management Considerations:
Based on our analysis and recommendations, the following are the key management considerations for the client to ensure the effective implementation of SLAs:
1. Clearly defined and measurable KPIs: The SLAs should have clearly defined and measurable KPIs to track the performance levels of the service providers accurately.
2. Regular monitoring and reporting: The client should establish a robust system to regularly monitor and track the performance levels of its service providers against the agreed-upon SLAs. This will ensure timely intervention in case of any discrepancies.
3. Enhanced Communication and Transparent Reporting: Communication channels between the client and service providers should be improved to facilitate transparent reporting and better collaboration.
Conclusion:
Through our analysis, we found that the periodic reports from the service providers were not accurately reflecting their performance levels in meeting the key areas outlined in the SLAs. While the service providers were meeting some of the KPIs, there were discrepancies in meeting others. The challenges identified in our analysis could potentially hinder the effectiveness of the SLAs. Therefore, we recommended that the client take steps to address these challenges and implement a more robust SLA management framework to ensure the delivery of high-quality services by its service providers.
References:
1. Hiatt, J., & Associates. (2006). How do you develop good SLAs? Retrieved from https://www.thoughtworks.com/insights/blog/managing-agreement-how-do-you-develop-good-slas
2. Burt, D. (2013). Service Level Agreements: Essentials for managing IT. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 12, 302-318.
3. Huang, G. (2018). Establishing Service Level Agreements with Third Party Providers. Information Management, 25(5), 15-18.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
