Attention business professionals,Are you ready to take your stakeholder engagement to the next level? Look no further.
Introducing our Stakeholder Engagement Metrics and Stakeholder Management Knowledge Base, the most comprehensive resource for all your stakeholder needs.
This powerful dataset includes 1523 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and case studies for effective stakeholder engagement.
We understand that time is of the essence when it comes to managing stakeholders, which is why our dataset is organized by urgency and scope, making it quick and easy to find the information you need.
But that′s not all.
Our Stakeholder Engagement Metrics and Stakeholder Management Knowledge Base sets itself apart from competitors and alternatives by providing a wide range of benefits.
From helping you identify and prioritize key stakeholders, to providing solutions for effective communication and conflict resolution, our dataset covers it all.
And with the option of using it yourself or investing in a cost-effective DIY alternative, this product is suitable for professionals at all levels.
Our detailed product overview and specifications make it easy to find exactly what you′re looking for.
And with a variety of research on stakeholder engagement included, you can trust that our dataset is backed by reliable data and industry expertise.
But don′t just take our word for it, businesses around the world have already seen the positive impact of implementing our Stakeholder Engagement Metrics and Stakeholder Management dataset.
With its user-friendly interface and practical approach, this product has proven to be a valuable tool for businesses of all sizes.
Now, you may be wondering about the cost.
We strive to make our product accessible to all professionals, which is why we offer it at an affordable price.
And let′s not forget about the pros and cons.
Our dataset is constantly updated and refined to ensure it meets the evolving needs of stakeholders, making it a trusted resource for years to come.
In summary, our Stakeholder Engagement Metrics and Stakeholder Management Knowledge Base is an essential tool for any business looking to improve their stakeholder engagement.
With its comprehensive coverage, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use, it′s the perfect resource for professionals like you.
Don′t wait, take your stakeholder engagement to the next level with our dataset today.
Are there any specific metrics that stakeholders believe that the Authority should include in project selection and evaluation? Are relations with stakeholders established as a critical KPI alongside other key metrics? What level of engagement do you require from stakeholders to achieve the EA strategic goals?
Stakeholder Engagement Metrics
Stakeholder Engagement Metrics refer to a set of measurable criteria that stakeholders deem important for the Authority to consider when selecting and evaluating projects. These metrics can help ensure stakeholder involvement and satisfaction with project decisions.
1. Conduct regular surveys and feedback sessions to gather stakeholder input: Benefits include understanding stakeholders′ needs and preferences, improving project decisions, and building trust and support.
2. Implement a stakeholder prioritization process: Benefits include focusing resources on key stakeholders, addressing their concerns, and improving project outcomes.
3. Establish clear communication channels: Benefits include timely updates, transparency, and building positive relationships with stakeholders.
4. Use social media and online platforms for engagement: Benefits include reaching a larger and more diverse group of stakeholders, increasing participation and feedback, and creating a sense of community.
5. Develop a stakeholder engagement plan: Benefits include outlining goals, strategies, and tactics for engaging stakeholders, as well as tracking progress and success.
6. Offer opportunities for face-to-face interactions: Benefits include personal connections, better understanding of stakeholders′ perspectives, and building partnerships.
7. Regularly review and analyze stakeholder feedback data: Benefits include identifying trends, areas for improvement, and measuring the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement efforts.
8. Engage stakeholders in decision-making processes: Benefits include fostering a sense of ownership, increasing stakeholder satisfaction, and ultimately achieving project success.
9. Conduct impact assessments to understand stakeholder concerns: Benefits include addressing potential risks and mitigating negative impacts on stakeholders, as well as building trust and support for the project.
10. Utilize a diverse range of engagement methods: Benefits include reaching different stakeholder groups, incorporating varying perspectives, and promoting inclusivity and diversity.
CONTROL QUESTION: Are there any specific metrics that stakeholders believe that the Authority should include in project selection and evaluation?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
The big hairy audacious goal for Stakeholder Engagement Metrics in 10 years is to have a standardized and comprehensive set of metrics that are universally agreed upon by stakeholders as key indicators for project selection and evaluation. This goal will not only demonstrate the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement in decision-making processes, but also ensure that all stakeholders are represented and their voices are heard.
Some specific metrics that stakeholders believe should be included in project selection and evaluation include:
1. Diversity and inclusivity: The demographic representation of stakeholders involved in the decision-making process should be measured to ensure diverse perspectives are considered.
2. Community impact: The impacts on local communities, including economic, social, and environmental factors, should be considered and measured in project selection and evaluation.
3. Transparency and accountability: The level of transparency and accountability in the decision-making process should be measured to ensure stakeholders are fully informed and trust is built.
4. Engagement effectiveness: The effectiveness of stakeholder engagement activities, such as public consultations and surveys, should be measured to improve engagement strategies in future projects.
5. Financial viability: The financial feasibility of the project, including costs, benefits, and potential risks, should be measured and evaluated to ensure the project will bring long-term value to stakeholders.
6. Long-term sustainability: The sustainability of the project, both socially and environmentally, should be measured to ensure it aligns with the interests and values of stakeholders.
Overall, the ultimate goal is to have a well-rounded and comprehensive set of metrics that consider the perspectives, needs, and priorities of all stakeholders, and use them to guide project selection and evaluation. This will lead to more inclusive and sustainable decision-making processes that benefit all stakeholders and the community as a whole.
"The customer support is top-notch. They were very helpful in answering my questions and setting me up for success."
Client Situation:
The client for this case study is an authority responsible for overseeing and managing large-scale public infrastructure projects. These projects have a significant impact on the community and the environment, and it is crucial for the authority to engage stakeholders in the project selection and evaluation process. Stakeholder engagement is essential to ensure the projects align with the needs and priorities of the community, and to build support and trust for the authority’s decisions.
Consulting Methodology:
As a consulting firm, our approach to addressing the client′s challenges involved conducting extensive research on best practices for stakeholder engagement metrics in the infrastructure sector. This research included reviewing consulting whitepapers, academic business journals, and market research reports. We also conducted interviews and focus groups with stakeholders, including community members, local businesses, government officials, and environmental and social advocacy groups, to understand their perspectives on the authority’s project selection and evaluation process.
Deliverables:
Based on our research and stakeholder consultations, we developed a set of recommended metrics for the client to include in their project selection and evaluation process. These metrics were designed to provide a comprehensive view of stakeholder engagement, including both qualitative and quantitative measures. Our deliverables included a detailed report outlining the recommended metrics and their rationale, as well as a user-friendly dashboard for the authority to track and monitor their performance against these metrics.
Implementation Challenges:
One of the main challenges in implementing these stakeholder engagement metrics was the need for the authority to shift its mindset and approach towards stakeholder engagement. Many stakeholders expressed frustration with feeling their voices were not being heard in the project selection and evaluation process. To address this challenge, we worked closely with the authority to develop a stakeholder engagement strategy that prioritized open communication, transparency, and inclusivity.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
The recommended metrics focused on measuring different aspects of stakeholder engagement, including:
1. Participation and Representation: This metric measures the number of stakeholders engaged and their representation from diverse groups, such as community members, businesses, and advocacy groups.
2. Transparency and Information Sharing: This metric evaluates the authority’s efforts in providing timely and accurate information to stakeholders about the projects, their potential impacts, and decision-making processes.
3. Feedback and Input: This metric measures the quality and quantity of feedback and input received from stakeholders, indicating how well the authority is incorporating stakeholder perspectives into their decisions.
4. Trust and Satisfaction: This metric assesses stakeholders′ trust and satisfaction with the authority′s project selection and evaluation process and their perception of the authority′s responsiveness to their concerns and suggestions.
Management Considerations:
To effectively use these stakeholder engagement metrics, the authority will need to establish a regular data collection and reporting process, as well as mechanisms for incorporating stakeholder feedback into decision-making. Additionally, the authority may need to invest in training and resources for staff to effectively engage with stakeholders and collect and analyze data.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, our consulting firm recommended a set of stakeholder engagement metrics for the authority to include in their project selection and evaluation process. These metrics were designed to provide a holistic view of stakeholder engagement and guide the authority in building trust and support from the community. By implementing these metrics and adjusting their approach to stakeholder engagement, the authority has the opportunity to improve their decision-making processes and build stronger relationships with their stakeholders.
References:
1. March, J., & Buckingham, D. (2018). Measuring stakeholder engagement for infrastructure projects: A review of current practices. PwC Consulting Whitepaper.
2. Nell, E., Martin, R., & Gerard, G. (2019). Beyond transparency: The role of stakeholder feedback in public infrastructure decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(1), 267-284.
3. McKinsey & Company. (2020). Measuring stakeholder engagement: A best practices guide for infrastructure projects. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/measuring-stakeholder-engagement-a-best-practices-guide-for-infrastructure-projects
4. World Bank. (2019). Stakeholder engagement in infrastructure projects: Lessons learned and way forward. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/infrastructure/brief/stakeholder-engagement-in-infrastructure-projects
Introducing our Stakeholder Engagement Metrics and Stakeholder Management Knowledge Base, the most comprehensive resource for all your stakeholder needs.
This powerful dataset includes 1523 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, results, and case studies for effective stakeholder engagement.
We understand that time is of the essence when it comes to managing stakeholders, which is why our dataset is organized by urgency and scope, making it quick and easy to find the information you need.
But that′s not all.
Our Stakeholder Engagement Metrics and Stakeholder Management Knowledge Base sets itself apart from competitors and alternatives by providing a wide range of benefits.
From helping you identify and prioritize key stakeholders, to providing solutions for effective communication and conflict resolution, our dataset covers it all.
And with the option of using it yourself or investing in a cost-effective DIY alternative, this product is suitable for professionals at all levels.
Our detailed product overview and specifications make it easy to find exactly what you′re looking for.
And with a variety of research on stakeholder engagement included, you can trust that our dataset is backed by reliable data and industry expertise.
But don′t just take our word for it, businesses around the world have already seen the positive impact of implementing our Stakeholder Engagement Metrics and Stakeholder Management dataset.
With its user-friendly interface and practical approach, this product has proven to be a valuable tool for businesses of all sizes.
Now, you may be wondering about the cost.
We strive to make our product accessible to all professionals, which is why we offer it at an affordable price.
And let′s not forget about the pros and cons.
Our dataset is constantly updated and refined to ensure it meets the evolving needs of stakeholders, making it a trusted resource for years to come.
In summary, our Stakeholder Engagement Metrics and Stakeholder Management Knowledge Base is an essential tool for any business looking to improve their stakeholder engagement.
With its comprehensive coverage, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use, it′s the perfect resource for professionals like you.
Don′t wait, take your stakeholder engagement to the next level with our dataset today.
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1523 prioritized Stakeholder Engagement Metrics requirements. - Extensive coverage of 141 Stakeholder Engagement Metrics topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 141 Stakeholder Engagement Metrics step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 141 Stakeholder Engagement Metrics case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Stakeholder Influence, Stakeholder Identification Process, Stakeholder Identification, Stakeholder Management Plan, Stakeholder Engagement Metrics, Stakeholder Involvement, Stakeholder Mapping, Stakeholder Engagement Plans, Employee Complaints, Stakeholder Understanding, Stakeholder Communication Channels, Document Management Systems, Adaptive Leadership, Stakeholder Needs, Competitive Advantage, Human Rights Impact, Adaptability Mindset, Cross Cultural Communication, Returns Management, Stakeholder Communication Strategy, Partnership Collaborations, Stakeholder Expectation Management, Inadequate Training, Stakeholder Conflict, Stakeholder Accountability, Stakeholder Engagement Model, Stakeholder Support, Stakeholder Engagement Roadmap, Stakeholder Engagement Decision Making, Stakeholder Consultation, Stakeholder Trust, Stakeholder Management, Continuous Improvement, Private Asset Management, Stakeholder Engagement Action Plan, Stakeholder Conflict Resolution, Operational Metrics, Lean Management, Six Sigma, Continuous improvement Introduction, Low Barrier To Entry, Stakeholder Engagement Plan, Monitoring And Controlling Process, Operational Execution, Change Management, Stakeholder Engagement Solutions, Stakeholder Management Framework, Stakeholder Analysis Map, Operational Costs, Stakeholder Expectations Management, Organizational Mandate, Stakeholder Feedback System, Consent Requirements, Asset Management Strategy, Virtual Team Management, Agile Stakeholder Management, Stakeholder Management Software, Leadership Competence, Honesty And Integrity, Highly Engaged Workforce, Compliance Cost, long-term loyalty, Stakeholder Communication Plan, Remote Working Policies, Competitive Strategy, Stakeholder Communication, Stakeholder Engagement Tactics, Stakeholder Education, Stakeholder Analysis Strategy, Stakeholder Engagement, Multi Stakeholder Governance, Competency Management System, Stakeholder Partnership, Stakeholder Consultation Process, Stakeholder Engagement Channels, Stakeholder Engagement Platforms, Timeline Management, Resistance Management, Time Based Estimates, Front End Design, IT Staffing, Risk Management, Stakeholder Analysis, Stakeholder Influence Strategies, Stakeholder Analysis Framework, Stakeholder Engagement Planning, Stakeholder Engagement Policy, Action Plan, Stakeholder Engagement Process, Stakeholder Analysis Method, Project Success Measurement, Stakeholder Engagement Success Factors, Business Process Redesign, Stakeholder Segmentation, Stakeholder Monitoring, Stakeholder Buy In, Stakeholder Engagement Tools, Stakeholder Engagement Framework, Stakeholder Engagement Skills, Stakeholder Expectations, ISO 22361, Stakeholder Engagement Strategy, Real-time Tracking, Stakeholder Assessment, Brand Reputation Management, Stakeholder Management Process, Stakeholder Collaboration, Stakeholder Impact, Stakeholder Management Matrix, Stakeholder Needs Assessment, Stakeholder Relations, Stakeholder Engagement Best Practices, Financial Reporting, Stakeholder Engagement Methods, Operational Improvement, Stakeholder Alignment, Timely Decision Making, Risk Analysis, Stakeholder Relationships Management, Stakeholder Prioritization Matrix, Stakeholder Engagement Governance, Stakeholder Empowerment, Stakeholder Engagement Cycle, Stakeholder Engagement Activities, Stakeholder Involvement Plan, Stakeholder Feedback, Stakeholder Management Approach, Voice of the Customer, Stakeholder Engagement Evaluation, Stakeholder Engagement Strategies, Stakeholder Satisfaction, Stakeholder Satisfaction Measurement, Process Efficiency, Stakeholder Relationship, Stakeholder Engagement Mapping, Stakeholder Engagement Resources, Strategic Management, Stakeholder Participation, Service Delivery, Stakeholder Prioritization, Project management roles and responsibilities, Information Technology, Quality Monitoring
Stakeholder Engagement Metrics Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Stakeholder Engagement Metrics
Stakeholder Engagement Metrics refer to a set of measurable criteria that stakeholders deem important for the Authority to consider when selecting and evaluating projects. These metrics can help ensure stakeholder involvement and satisfaction with project decisions.
1. Conduct regular surveys and feedback sessions to gather stakeholder input: Benefits include understanding stakeholders′ needs and preferences, improving project decisions, and building trust and support.
2. Implement a stakeholder prioritization process: Benefits include focusing resources on key stakeholders, addressing their concerns, and improving project outcomes.
3. Establish clear communication channels: Benefits include timely updates, transparency, and building positive relationships with stakeholders.
4. Use social media and online platforms for engagement: Benefits include reaching a larger and more diverse group of stakeholders, increasing participation and feedback, and creating a sense of community.
5. Develop a stakeholder engagement plan: Benefits include outlining goals, strategies, and tactics for engaging stakeholders, as well as tracking progress and success.
6. Offer opportunities for face-to-face interactions: Benefits include personal connections, better understanding of stakeholders′ perspectives, and building partnerships.
7. Regularly review and analyze stakeholder feedback data: Benefits include identifying trends, areas for improvement, and measuring the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement efforts.
8. Engage stakeholders in decision-making processes: Benefits include fostering a sense of ownership, increasing stakeholder satisfaction, and ultimately achieving project success.
9. Conduct impact assessments to understand stakeholder concerns: Benefits include addressing potential risks and mitigating negative impacts on stakeholders, as well as building trust and support for the project.
10. Utilize a diverse range of engagement methods: Benefits include reaching different stakeholder groups, incorporating varying perspectives, and promoting inclusivity and diversity.
CONTROL QUESTION: Are there any specific metrics that stakeholders believe that the Authority should include in project selection and evaluation?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
The big hairy audacious goal for Stakeholder Engagement Metrics in 10 years is to have a standardized and comprehensive set of metrics that are universally agreed upon by stakeholders as key indicators for project selection and evaluation. This goal will not only demonstrate the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement in decision-making processes, but also ensure that all stakeholders are represented and their voices are heard.
Some specific metrics that stakeholders believe should be included in project selection and evaluation include:
1. Diversity and inclusivity: The demographic representation of stakeholders involved in the decision-making process should be measured to ensure diverse perspectives are considered.
2. Community impact: The impacts on local communities, including economic, social, and environmental factors, should be considered and measured in project selection and evaluation.
3. Transparency and accountability: The level of transparency and accountability in the decision-making process should be measured to ensure stakeholders are fully informed and trust is built.
4. Engagement effectiveness: The effectiveness of stakeholder engagement activities, such as public consultations and surveys, should be measured to improve engagement strategies in future projects.
5. Financial viability: The financial feasibility of the project, including costs, benefits, and potential risks, should be measured and evaluated to ensure the project will bring long-term value to stakeholders.
6. Long-term sustainability: The sustainability of the project, both socially and environmentally, should be measured to ensure it aligns with the interests and values of stakeholders.
Overall, the ultimate goal is to have a well-rounded and comprehensive set of metrics that consider the perspectives, needs, and priorities of all stakeholders, and use them to guide project selection and evaluation. This will lead to more inclusive and sustainable decision-making processes that benefit all stakeholders and the community as a whole.
Customer Testimonials:
"The customer support is top-notch. They were very helpful in answering my questions and setting me up for success."
"I`m using the prioritized recommendations to provide better care for my patients. It`s helping me identify potential issues early on and tailor treatment plans accordingly."
"The data is clean, organized, and easy to access. I was able to import it into my workflow seamlessly and start seeing results immediately."
Stakeholder Engagement Metrics Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Client Situation:
The client for this case study is an authority responsible for overseeing and managing large-scale public infrastructure projects. These projects have a significant impact on the community and the environment, and it is crucial for the authority to engage stakeholders in the project selection and evaluation process. Stakeholder engagement is essential to ensure the projects align with the needs and priorities of the community, and to build support and trust for the authority’s decisions.
Consulting Methodology:
As a consulting firm, our approach to addressing the client′s challenges involved conducting extensive research on best practices for stakeholder engagement metrics in the infrastructure sector. This research included reviewing consulting whitepapers, academic business journals, and market research reports. We also conducted interviews and focus groups with stakeholders, including community members, local businesses, government officials, and environmental and social advocacy groups, to understand their perspectives on the authority’s project selection and evaluation process.
Deliverables:
Based on our research and stakeholder consultations, we developed a set of recommended metrics for the client to include in their project selection and evaluation process. These metrics were designed to provide a comprehensive view of stakeholder engagement, including both qualitative and quantitative measures. Our deliverables included a detailed report outlining the recommended metrics and their rationale, as well as a user-friendly dashboard for the authority to track and monitor their performance against these metrics.
Implementation Challenges:
One of the main challenges in implementing these stakeholder engagement metrics was the need for the authority to shift its mindset and approach towards stakeholder engagement. Many stakeholders expressed frustration with feeling their voices were not being heard in the project selection and evaluation process. To address this challenge, we worked closely with the authority to develop a stakeholder engagement strategy that prioritized open communication, transparency, and inclusivity.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
The recommended metrics focused on measuring different aspects of stakeholder engagement, including:
1. Participation and Representation: This metric measures the number of stakeholders engaged and their representation from diverse groups, such as community members, businesses, and advocacy groups.
2. Transparency and Information Sharing: This metric evaluates the authority’s efforts in providing timely and accurate information to stakeholders about the projects, their potential impacts, and decision-making processes.
3. Feedback and Input: This metric measures the quality and quantity of feedback and input received from stakeholders, indicating how well the authority is incorporating stakeholder perspectives into their decisions.
4. Trust and Satisfaction: This metric assesses stakeholders′ trust and satisfaction with the authority′s project selection and evaluation process and their perception of the authority′s responsiveness to their concerns and suggestions.
Management Considerations:
To effectively use these stakeholder engagement metrics, the authority will need to establish a regular data collection and reporting process, as well as mechanisms for incorporating stakeholder feedback into decision-making. Additionally, the authority may need to invest in training and resources for staff to effectively engage with stakeholders and collect and analyze data.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, our consulting firm recommended a set of stakeholder engagement metrics for the authority to include in their project selection and evaluation process. These metrics were designed to provide a holistic view of stakeholder engagement and guide the authority in building trust and support from the community. By implementing these metrics and adjusting their approach to stakeholder engagement, the authority has the opportunity to improve their decision-making processes and build stronger relationships with their stakeholders.
References:
1. March, J., & Buckingham, D. (2018). Measuring stakeholder engagement for infrastructure projects: A review of current practices. PwC Consulting Whitepaper.
2. Nell, E., Martin, R., & Gerard, G. (2019). Beyond transparency: The role of stakeholder feedback in public infrastructure decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(1), 267-284.
3. McKinsey & Company. (2020). Measuring stakeholder engagement: A best practices guide for infrastructure projects. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/measuring-stakeholder-engagement-a-best-practices-guide-for-infrastructure-projects
4. World Bank. (2019). Stakeholder engagement in infrastructure projects: Lessons learned and way forward. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/infrastructure/brief/stakeholder-engagement-in-infrastructure-projects
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
