Attention software professionals and businesses!
Are you tired of struggling to prioritize and manage software maintenance tasks? Are you looking for a solution that can save you time, money, and headaches? Look no further than our Versioning Approaches in Software Maintenance Knowledge Base!
Containing a comprehensive collection of the most essential questions to ask when prioritizing maintenance tasks by urgency and scope, our knowledge base is the ultimate tool for streamlining your software maintenance processes.
With over 1595 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, and case studies/use cases, our dataset offers everything you need to efficiently and effectively manage your software maintenance.
But what sets our knowledge base apart from competitors and alternatives? For starters, it is specifically designed for professionals in the software industry, making it the perfect fit for your business needs.
It offers a wide range of approaches for versioning in software maintenance, ensuring that you can find the best fit for your specific projects.
Not only is our knowledge base a professional-grade product, but it is also incredibly user-friendly.
With clear and concise information on each approach, you can easily understand and apply them to your maintenance tasks.
And the best part? Our knowledge base is DIY and affordable, providing you with a cost-effective alternative to hiring expensive consultants or purchasing complicated software.
Let′s talk about the benefits of using our Versioning Approaches in Software Maintenance Knowledge Base.
Firstly, it saves you time by streamlining the process of prioritizing maintenance tasks, allowing you to focus on more pressing matters.
Secondly, it helps you save money by avoiding unnecessary maintenance costs and maximizing the efficiency of your resources.
And lastly, it reduces headaches by providing you with a clear and organized approach to software maintenance.
Our knowledge base is backed by thorough research on versioning approaches in software maintenance, ensuring its accuracy and effectiveness.
It has been designed to meet the needs of small businesses, as well as large corporations, making it a versatile and valuable tool for any software professional.
So, why wait? Upgrade your software maintenance process today with our Versioning Approaches in Software Maintenance Knowledge Base.
Say goodbye to inefficient and costly maintenance tasks and hello to a streamlined and effective approach.
Don′t miss out on this game-changing product.
Get your copy now and take your software maintenance game to the next level!
Can encouraged deprecation mechanisms, versioning, and architectural approaches like microservices help avoid technical debt by simply disposing code?
Versioning Approaches
No, versioning and microservices may help reduce technical debt, but they don′t eliminate the need for proper management and consideration of deprecated code.
1. Encouraged deprecation mechanisms:
This approach allows for gradual removal of outdated code, reducing the risk of major disruptions.
2. Versioning:
Keeping track of changes and releases makes it easier to identify and address issues in specific versions.
3. Microservices architecture:
Allows for modular and independent development, making it easier to update or replace individual components without disrupting the entire system.
4. Clear documentation:
Proper documentation makes it easier to understand and maintain the code, reducing the chances of introducing technical debt.
5. Regular code review:
Regular code review helps catch and fix issues early on, preventing them from accumulating and causing technical debt.
6. Refactoring:
A process of improving the code structure without changing its functionality can help reduce technical debt over time.
7. Automated testing:
Comprehensive automated testing minimizes the risk of introducing new bugs and ensures smoother updates and maintenance.
8. Continuous integration and deployment:
Automated CI/CD pipelines can catch errors and facilitate quick fixes, reducing the chances of creating technical debt.
9. Adopting best practices:
Following coding standards and industry best practices can create cleaner and easier to maintain code.
10. Prioritizing maintenance:
Allocating time and resources specifically for maintenance can prevent the accumulation of technical debt in the long term.
CONTROL QUESTION: Can encouraged deprecation mechanisms, versioning, and architectural approaches like microservices help avoid technical debt by simply disposing code?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, the use of encouraged deprecation mechanisms, versioning, and architectural approaches like microservices will have completely revolutionized software development, leading to a complete eradication of technical debt in organizations worldwide. This will be achieved through a cultural shift towards proactive maintenance and constant evolution of software systems.
By implementing strict version control and encouraging deprecation of outdated code, organizations will be able to continuously update and improve their systems without accumulating technical debt. Microservices will allow for a modular and scalable approach to development, making it easier to replace outdated code with newer and more efficient components.
Additionally, the widespread adoption of DevOps practices and automation tools will streamline the process of identifying, managing, and addressing technical debt, ensuring that it does not accumulate and become a hindrance to future development.
As a result, organizations will be able to deliver high-quality, efficient, and maintainable software products at a faster pace, staying ahead of market demands and remaining competitive. The elimination of technical debt will also significantly reduce the cost of maintenance and updates, allowing for greater investment in innovation and growth.
Overall, the integration of encouraged deprecation mechanisms, versioning, and architectural approaches in software development will lead to a future where technical debt is a thing of the past, enabling organizations to focus on continuous improvement and innovation.
"The price is very reasonable for the value you get. This dataset has saved me time, money, and resources, and I can`t recommend it enough."
Client Situation:
XYZ Company is a fast-growing technology startup that provides a software solution for small businesses. The company′s product has gained popularity and the customer base has been increasing rapidly. However, with this growth, the development team has been struggling to keep up with the demand for new features and updates. As a result, the codebase has become complex, making it difficult to maintain and add new features. It has led to technical debt, impacting the quality of the product and causing delays in delivery.
Consulting Methodology:
To address the client′s challenges, our consulting team proposed to implement versioning approaches along with encouraged deprecation mechanisms and microservices architecture. The aim was to avoid technical debt by regularly updating and disposing of old, redundant code.
Firstly, we conducted a thorough analysis of the current codebase and identified areas that required improvement. We identified legacy code and deprecated features that were no longer in use. Next, we worked closely with the development team to define a version control strategy and guidelines for deprecating code.
Deliverables:
1. Version Control Strategy: The consulting team developed a comprehensive version control strategy that included branching, merging, and release management processes. This ensured that changes made to the code were tracked, and older versions could be reverted if necessary.
2. Deprecation Guidelines: Based on an analysis of the codebase, the consulting team created a set of guidelines for deprecating code. These guidelines included identifying outdated and redundant code, communicating the need for deprecation to stakeholders, and providing alternative solutions.
3. Microservices Architecture: To improve the scalability and maintainability of the code, we recommended implementing a microservices architecture. This approach involves breaking down the application into smaller, independent services that can be deployed and updated separately.
Implementation Challenges:
Implementing these approaches faced a few challenges. Firstly, convincing stakeholders that the time and resources invested in code cleanup and version control would result in long-term benefits was a challenge. Secondly, the development team had to balance between adding new features and maintaining the codebase. Finally, there was a learning curve involved in adopting a microservices architecture, which required training and upskilling of the development team.
KPIs:
1. Reduced Technical Debt: The primary KPI for this project was reducing technical debt. The number of bugs, errors, and delays caused by the current state of the codebase were tracked before and after implementing the proposed approaches.
2. Faster Delivery: With version control and microservices in place, we expected to see an improvement in the delivery time of new features. This was measured by tracking the average time taken to develop and deploy a new feature.
3. Improved Customer Satisfaction: Another important KPI was the impact on customer satisfaction. We conducted surveys to gather feedback from customers regarding the quality and performance of the product.
Management Considerations:
1. Training and Support: To ensure a smooth transition and adoption of the proposed approaches, it was essential to provide training and support to the development team. This helped them understand the value of version control and encouraged deprecation.
2. Ongoing Maintenance: Version control and encouraged deprecation are ongoing processes that require regular maintenance. This needs to be factored in while planning resources and budget for software development.
3. Stakeholder Communication: It was crucial to communicate the progress and benefits of these approaches to all stakeholders, including customers. This helped build trust and transparency, addressing any concerns they might have.
Conclusion:
The implementation of versioning approaches, encouraged deprecation mechanisms, and microservices architecture had a significant impact on XYZ Company′s product development. The number of bugs and errors reduced, allowing the development team to focus on adding new features. The incorporation of these practices also resulted in faster delivery times and improved customer satisfaction. Adopting these approaches led to a more streamlined and efficient development process, resulting in a significant reduction in technical debt. This not only improved the quality of the product but also helped maintain a competitive edge in the market.
Citations:
- Avoiding Technical Debt: Encouraging New Patterns, Deprecating Old Code by Matthew Daly and Stefan Tilkov (2017)
- The Strategic Impact of Microservices for Business Operations Optimization by The Enterprisers Project (2019)
- Version Control with Branching and Merging by Microsoft (2020)
- Managing Legacy Components in Domain-Specific Software Evolution by Haicheng Wu and Michael Goedicke (2011).
Are you tired of struggling to prioritize and manage software maintenance tasks? Are you looking for a solution that can save you time, money, and headaches? Look no further than our Versioning Approaches in Software Maintenance Knowledge Base!
Containing a comprehensive collection of the most essential questions to ask when prioritizing maintenance tasks by urgency and scope, our knowledge base is the ultimate tool for streamlining your software maintenance processes.
With over 1595 prioritized requirements, solutions, benefits, and case studies/use cases, our dataset offers everything you need to efficiently and effectively manage your software maintenance.
But what sets our knowledge base apart from competitors and alternatives? For starters, it is specifically designed for professionals in the software industry, making it the perfect fit for your business needs.
It offers a wide range of approaches for versioning in software maintenance, ensuring that you can find the best fit for your specific projects.
Not only is our knowledge base a professional-grade product, but it is also incredibly user-friendly.
With clear and concise information on each approach, you can easily understand and apply them to your maintenance tasks.
And the best part? Our knowledge base is DIY and affordable, providing you with a cost-effective alternative to hiring expensive consultants or purchasing complicated software.
Let′s talk about the benefits of using our Versioning Approaches in Software Maintenance Knowledge Base.
Firstly, it saves you time by streamlining the process of prioritizing maintenance tasks, allowing you to focus on more pressing matters.
Secondly, it helps you save money by avoiding unnecessary maintenance costs and maximizing the efficiency of your resources.
And lastly, it reduces headaches by providing you with a clear and organized approach to software maintenance.
Our knowledge base is backed by thorough research on versioning approaches in software maintenance, ensuring its accuracy and effectiveness.
It has been designed to meet the needs of small businesses, as well as large corporations, making it a versatile and valuable tool for any software professional.
So, why wait? Upgrade your software maintenance process today with our Versioning Approaches in Software Maintenance Knowledge Base.
Say goodbye to inefficient and costly maintenance tasks and hello to a streamlined and effective approach.
Don′t miss out on this game-changing product.
Get your copy now and take your software maintenance game to the next level!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1595 prioritized Versioning Approaches requirements. - Extensive coverage of 267 Versioning Approaches topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 267 Versioning Approaches step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 267 Versioning Approaches case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Multi Lingual Support, End User Training, Risk Assessment Reports, Training Evaluation Methods, Middleware Updates, Training Materials, Network Traffic Analysis, Code Documentation Standards, Legacy Support, Performance Profiling, Compliance Changes, Security Patches, Security Compliance Audits, Test Automation Framework, Software Upgrades, Audit Trails, Usability Improvements, Asset Management, Proxy Server Configuration, Regulatory Updates, Tracking Changes, Testing Procedures, IT Governance, Performance Tuning, Dependency Analysis, Release Automation, System Scalability, Data Recovery Plans, User Training Resources, Patch Testing, Server Updates, Load Balancing, Monitoring Tools Integration, Memory Management, Platform Migration, Code Complexity Analysis, Release Notes Review, Product Feature Request Management, Performance Unit Testing, Data Structuring, Client Support Channels, Release Scheduling, Performance Metrics, Reactive Maintenance, Maintenance Process Optimization, Performance Reports, Performance Monitoring System, Code Coverage Analysis, Deferred Maintenance, Outage Prevention, Internal Communication, Memory Leaks, Technical Knowledge Transfer, Performance Regression, Backup Media Management, Version Support, Deployment Automation, Alert Management, Training Documentation, Release Change Control, Release Cycle, Error Logging, Technical Debt, Security Best Practices, Software Testing, Code Review Processes, Third Party Integration, Vendor Management, Outsourcing Risk, Scripting Support, API Usability, Dependency Management, Migration Planning, Technical Support, Service Level Agreements, Product Feedback Analysis, System Health Checks, Patch Management, Security Incident Response Plans, Change Management, Product Roadmap, Maintenance Costs, Release Implementation Planning, End Of Life Management, Backup Frequency, Code Documentation, Data Protection Measures, User Experience, Server Backups, Features Verification, Regression Test Planning, Code Monitoring, Backward Compatibility, Configuration Management Database, Risk Assessment, Software Inventory Tracking, Versioning Approaches, Architecture Diagrams, Platform Upgrades, Project Management, Defect Management, Package Management, Deployed Environment Management, Failure Analysis, User Adoption Strategies, Maintenance Standards, Problem Resolution, Service Oriented Architecture, Package Validation, Multi Platform Support, API Updates, End User License Agreement Management, Release Rollback, Product Lifecycle Management, Configuration Changes, Issue Prioritization, User Adoption Rate, Configuration Troubleshooting, Service Outages, Compiler Optimization, Feature Enhancements, Capacity Planning, New Feature Development, Accessibility Testing, Root Cause Analysis, Issue Tracking, Field Service Technology, End User Support, Regression Testing, Remote Maintenance, Proactive Maintenance, Product Backlog, Release Tracking, Configuration Visibility, Regression Analysis, Multiple Application Environments, Configuration Backups, Client Feedback Collection, Compliance Requirements, Bug Tracking, Release Sign Off, Disaster Recovery Testing, Error Reporting, Source Code Review, Quality Assurance, Maintenance Dashboard, API Versioning, Mobile Compatibility, Compliance Audits, Resource Management System, User Feedback Analysis, Versioning Policies, Resilience Strategies, Component Reuse, Backup Strategies, Patch Deployment, Code Refactoring, Application Monitoring, Maintenance Software, Regulatory Compliance, Log Management Systems, Change Control Board, Release Code Review, Version Control, Security Updates, Release Staging, Documentation Organization, System Compatibility, Fault Tolerance, Update Releases, Code Profiling, Disaster Recovery, Auditing Processes, Object Oriented Design, Code Review, Adaptive Maintenance, Compatibility Testing, Risk Mitigation Strategies, User Acceptance Testing, Database Maintenance, Performance Benchmarks, Security Audits, Performance Compliance, Deployment Strategies, Investment Planning, Optimization Strategies, Software maintenance, Team Collaboration, Real Time Support, Code Quality Analysis, Code Penetration Testing, Maintenance Team Training, Database Replication, Offered Customers, Process capability baseline, Continuous Integration, Application Lifecycle Management Tools, Backup Restoration, Emergency Response Plans, Legacy System Integration, Performance Evaluations, Application Development, User Training Sessions, Change Tracking System, Data Backup Management, Database Indexing, Alert Correlation, Third Party Dependencies, Issue Escalation, Maintenance Contracts, Code Reviews, Security Features Assessment, Document Representation, Test Coverage, Resource Scalability, Design Integrity, Compliance Management, Data Fragmentation, Integration Planning, Hardware Compatibility, Support Ticket Tracking, Recovery Strategies, Feature Scaling, Error Handling, Performance Monitoring, Custom Workflow Implementation, Issue Resolution Time, Emergency Maintenance, Developer Collaboration Tools, Customized Plans, Security Updates Review, Data Archiving, End User Satisfaction, Priority Bug Fixes, Developer Documentation, Bug Fixing, Risk Management, Database Optimization, Retirement Planning, Configuration Management, Customization Options, Performance Optimization, Software Development Roadmap, Secure Development Practices, Client Server Interaction, Cloud Integration, Alert Thresholds, Third Party Vulnerabilities, Software Roadmap, Server Maintenance, User Access Permissions, Supplier Maintenance, License Management, Website Maintenance, Task Prioritization, Backup Validation, External Dependency Management, Data Correction Strategies, Resource Allocation, Content Management, Product Support Lifecycle, Disaster Preparedness, Workflow Management, Documentation Updates, Infrastructure Asset Management, Data Validation, Performance Alerts
Versioning Approaches Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Versioning Approaches
No, versioning and microservices may help reduce technical debt, but they don′t eliminate the need for proper management and consideration of deprecated code.
1. Encouraged deprecation mechanisms:
This approach allows for gradual removal of outdated code, reducing the risk of major disruptions.
2. Versioning:
Keeping track of changes and releases makes it easier to identify and address issues in specific versions.
3. Microservices architecture:
Allows for modular and independent development, making it easier to update or replace individual components without disrupting the entire system.
4. Clear documentation:
Proper documentation makes it easier to understand and maintain the code, reducing the chances of introducing technical debt.
5. Regular code review:
Regular code review helps catch and fix issues early on, preventing them from accumulating and causing technical debt.
6. Refactoring:
A process of improving the code structure without changing its functionality can help reduce technical debt over time.
7. Automated testing:
Comprehensive automated testing minimizes the risk of introducing new bugs and ensures smoother updates and maintenance.
8. Continuous integration and deployment:
Automated CI/CD pipelines can catch errors and facilitate quick fixes, reducing the chances of creating technical debt.
9. Adopting best practices:
Following coding standards and industry best practices can create cleaner and easier to maintain code.
10. Prioritizing maintenance:
Allocating time and resources specifically for maintenance can prevent the accumulation of technical debt in the long term.
CONTROL QUESTION: Can encouraged deprecation mechanisms, versioning, and architectural approaches like microservices help avoid technical debt by simply disposing code?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, the use of encouraged deprecation mechanisms, versioning, and architectural approaches like microservices will have completely revolutionized software development, leading to a complete eradication of technical debt in organizations worldwide. This will be achieved through a cultural shift towards proactive maintenance and constant evolution of software systems.
By implementing strict version control and encouraging deprecation of outdated code, organizations will be able to continuously update and improve their systems without accumulating technical debt. Microservices will allow for a modular and scalable approach to development, making it easier to replace outdated code with newer and more efficient components.
Additionally, the widespread adoption of DevOps practices and automation tools will streamline the process of identifying, managing, and addressing technical debt, ensuring that it does not accumulate and become a hindrance to future development.
As a result, organizations will be able to deliver high-quality, efficient, and maintainable software products at a faster pace, staying ahead of market demands and remaining competitive. The elimination of technical debt will also significantly reduce the cost of maintenance and updates, allowing for greater investment in innovation and growth.
Overall, the integration of encouraged deprecation mechanisms, versioning, and architectural approaches in software development will lead to a future where technical debt is a thing of the past, enabling organizations to focus on continuous improvement and innovation.
Customer Testimonials:
"The price is very reasonable for the value you get. This dataset has saved me time, money, and resources, and I can`t recommend it enough."
"I used this dataset to personalize my e-commerce website, and the results have been fantastic! Conversion rates have skyrocketed, and customer satisfaction is through the roof."
"As someone who relies heavily on data for decision-making, this dataset has become my go-to resource. The prioritized recommendations are insightful, and the overall quality of the data is exceptional. Bravo!"
Versioning Approaches Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Client Situation:
XYZ Company is a fast-growing technology startup that provides a software solution for small businesses. The company′s product has gained popularity and the customer base has been increasing rapidly. However, with this growth, the development team has been struggling to keep up with the demand for new features and updates. As a result, the codebase has become complex, making it difficult to maintain and add new features. It has led to technical debt, impacting the quality of the product and causing delays in delivery.
Consulting Methodology:
To address the client′s challenges, our consulting team proposed to implement versioning approaches along with encouraged deprecation mechanisms and microservices architecture. The aim was to avoid technical debt by regularly updating and disposing of old, redundant code.
Firstly, we conducted a thorough analysis of the current codebase and identified areas that required improvement. We identified legacy code and deprecated features that were no longer in use. Next, we worked closely with the development team to define a version control strategy and guidelines for deprecating code.
Deliverables:
1. Version Control Strategy: The consulting team developed a comprehensive version control strategy that included branching, merging, and release management processes. This ensured that changes made to the code were tracked, and older versions could be reverted if necessary.
2. Deprecation Guidelines: Based on an analysis of the codebase, the consulting team created a set of guidelines for deprecating code. These guidelines included identifying outdated and redundant code, communicating the need for deprecation to stakeholders, and providing alternative solutions.
3. Microservices Architecture: To improve the scalability and maintainability of the code, we recommended implementing a microservices architecture. This approach involves breaking down the application into smaller, independent services that can be deployed and updated separately.
Implementation Challenges:
Implementing these approaches faced a few challenges. Firstly, convincing stakeholders that the time and resources invested in code cleanup and version control would result in long-term benefits was a challenge. Secondly, the development team had to balance between adding new features and maintaining the codebase. Finally, there was a learning curve involved in adopting a microservices architecture, which required training and upskilling of the development team.
KPIs:
1. Reduced Technical Debt: The primary KPI for this project was reducing technical debt. The number of bugs, errors, and delays caused by the current state of the codebase were tracked before and after implementing the proposed approaches.
2. Faster Delivery: With version control and microservices in place, we expected to see an improvement in the delivery time of new features. This was measured by tracking the average time taken to develop and deploy a new feature.
3. Improved Customer Satisfaction: Another important KPI was the impact on customer satisfaction. We conducted surveys to gather feedback from customers regarding the quality and performance of the product.
Management Considerations:
1. Training and Support: To ensure a smooth transition and adoption of the proposed approaches, it was essential to provide training and support to the development team. This helped them understand the value of version control and encouraged deprecation.
2. Ongoing Maintenance: Version control and encouraged deprecation are ongoing processes that require regular maintenance. This needs to be factored in while planning resources and budget for software development.
3. Stakeholder Communication: It was crucial to communicate the progress and benefits of these approaches to all stakeholders, including customers. This helped build trust and transparency, addressing any concerns they might have.
Conclusion:
The implementation of versioning approaches, encouraged deprecation mechanisms, and microservices architecture had a significant impact on XYZ Company′s product development. The number of bugs and errors reduced, allowing the development team to focus on adding new features. The incorporation of these practices also resulted in faster delivery times and improved customer satisfaction. Adopting these approaches led to a more streamlined and efficient development process, resulting in a significant reduction in technical debt. This not only improved the quality of the product but also helped maintain a competitive edge in the market.
Citations:
- Avoiding Technical Debt: Encouraging New Patterns, Deprecating Old Code by Matthew Daly and Stefan Tilkov (2017)
- The Strategic Impact of Microservices for Business Operations Optimization by The Enterprisers Project (2019)
- Version Control with Branching and Merging by Microsoft (2020)
- Managing Legacy Components in Domain-Specific Software Evolution by Haicheng Wu and Michael Goedicke (2011).
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
