Attention all Field Service Management professionals!
Are you tired of juggling a large workload and struggling to prioritize urgent tasks? Look no further, our Workload Balancing Knowledge Base is here to save the day.
With 1534 prioritized requirements, solutions, and benefits, our dataset offers the most important questions to ask in order to achieve the best results for your team.
Our Workload Balancing solutions are specifically designed to help you manage your workload effectively, while also considering urgency and scope.
But that′s not all, our dataset also includes real-life case studies and use cases, giving you concrete examples of how our Workload Balancing techniques have led to success for other businesses.
Compared to our competitors and alternatives, our Workload Balancing Knowledge Base stands out as the top choice for professionals.
Our product is user-friendly and easy to implement, making it the perfect DIY/affordable alternative for those looking to improve their field service management without breaking the bank.
Curious about the product itself? Our Workload Balancing Knowledge Base provides a detailed overview and specification breakdown, so you know exactly what you′re getting.
It′s important to note that our product is in a league of its own, as it caters specifically to field service management professionals rather than just being a semi-related product.
But enough about us, let′s talk about the benefits to you and your business.
With our Workload Balancing Knowledge Base, you can expect increased efficiency and productivity, leading to higher customer satisfaction and ultimately, a boost in profits.
Don′t just take our word for it, extensive research has proven the effectiveness of our techniques in the field service management industry.
Worried about the cost? Our Workload Balancing Knowledge Base offers a cost-effective solution that will ultimately save you time and money in the long run.
While there may be some pros and cons to consider, we stand by our product and are confident in its ability to revolutionize your workload management.
In a nutshell, our Workload Balancing Knowledge Base is the perfect tool for businesses looking to improve their field service management.
It′s affordable, user-friendly, and most importantly, gets results.
Don′t let a heavy workload hold you back any longer, try our product today and experience the benefits firsthand.
Let us help you achieve a well-balanced workload that maximizes efficiency and success.
Order now!
Do you need to improve the redundancy or introduce workload balancing into your applications? Have you implemented any form of IP workload balancing within your TCP/IP network? Can your load balancing strategies effectively balance the workloads in the cluster of machines?
Workload Balancing
Workload balancing is the process of distributing work evenly across multiple systems or resources in order to optimize efficiency and prevent overloading.
1) Introducing a field service scheduling software to optimize technician workload and minimize travel time. (Efficient resource utilization)
2) Implementing a real-time dispatch system for automatic assignment of jobs based on skillset and location. (Faster response times)
3) Utilizing predictive analytics to forecast future demand and allocate resources accordingly. (Better resource allocation)
4) Enabling self-service portals for customers to schedule appointments, reducing the workload for dispatchers. (Streamlined processes)
5) Utilizing mobile workforce management tools for real-time monitoring and adjustment of technician schedules. (Improved productivity)
6) Integrating with a GPS tracking system for efficient route planning and reduced travel time. (Cost savings)
7) Providing remote access to job information for technicians, reducing the need for back-and-forth communication. (Increased efficiency)
8) Utilizing AI-powered scheduling algorithms to balance technician workload and reduce overtime costs. (Optimized work schedule)
9) Implementing a comprehensive training program for technicians to enhance their skills and handle a wider range of tasks. (Increased flexibility)
10) Utilizing dynamic scheduling techniques, such as dynamic job routing, to assign urgent tasks to available technicians. (Enhanced customer satisfaction)
CONTROL QUESTION: Do you need to improve the redundancy or introduce workload balancing into the applications?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, my big hairy audacious goal for workload balancing is to have a fully integrated and automated system in place that utilizes cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to continuously monitor and optimize our applications′ workload distribution. This system will proactively identify and balance any bottlenecks or gaps in resource usage, ensuring optimal performance and efficiency at all times.
Additionally, I aim to implement a comprehensive redundancy plan that can seamlessly handle any unexpected spikes in workload or system failures without impacting the overall user experience. This will involve incorporating robust failover mechanisms and backup systems, as well as constantly testing and refining our disaster recovery processes.
By achieving this goal, our workload balancing capabilities will be unmatched in the industry, allowing us to handle peak demands and fluctuations effortlessly while maintaining a high level of system reliability. This will not only improve our overall business operations but also bolster our reputation as a trusted and dependable provider in the market.
"The continuous learning capabilities of the dataset are impressive. It`s constantly adapting and improving, which ensures that my recommendations are always up-to-date."
Synopsis:
The client, a medium-sized technology company, was facing challenges in managing their ever-increasing workload and ensuring high availability of their applications. The company′s growth over the past few years had resulted in a significant increase in their customer base, leading to a substantial rise in their workload. As a result, their applications were experiencing frequent downtimes, causing disruptions in business operations and resulting in dissatisfied customers.
Upon conducting a thorough assessment of the company′s IT infrastructure, it was evident that the client lacked an effective strategy for workload balancing and redundancy. Their existing system consisted of multiple servers and data centers hosting various applications, but there was no systematic approach in place for distributing the workload and creating redundancy across these servers.
The company approached our consulting firm with the objective of addressing these issues and improving the overall performance and resilience of their applications. The focus was on determining the most suitable solution – whether to introduce workload balancing or improve redundancy – to ensure optimum utilization of resources, mitigate the risks of downtime, and enhance the end-user experience.
Consulting Methodology:
Our team followed a structured approach to address the client′s requirements while keeping in mind industry best practices and the latest research in the field of workload balancing and redundancy. The methodology involved the following steps:
1. Assess current state: This step involved gathering information about the client′s IT infrastructure, including server and network configurations, application architecture, and performance metrics. The primary objective was to identify the key pain points and determine the root cause of the problems faced by the client.
2. Perform cost-benefit analysis: After assessing the current state, our team conducted a cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the potential impact of both options – introducing workload balancing and improving redundancy. This analysis considered factors such as implementation costs, operational costs, and the expected outcomes of each solution.
3. Determine the workload balancing requirements: Based on the information gathered in the first two steps, our team identified the specific workload balancing requirements for the client, such as traffic patterns, resource utilization, and application dependencies.
4. Develop a roadmap: The next step was to develop a detailed roadmap for implementing the chosen solution. This included defining the scope of work, identifying the necessary resources, and creating a timeline for completion.
5. Implementation: Our team worked closely with the client to implement the selected solution, ensuring minimal disruption to their operations. This involved configuring new load balancers, setting up servers in different data centers for redundancy, and establishing procedures for managing workload distribution.
6. Performance monitoring: Once the solution was implemented, our team set up a performance monitoring system to measure the impact of the changes on the client′s IT infrastructure. This helped us track key performance indicators (KPIs) and make any necessary adjustments to ensure optimal results.
Deliverables:
1. A comprehensive report highlighting our assessment of the client′s current state, including pain points and causes.
2. A cost-benefit analysis report outlining the potential costs and benefits of introducing workload balancing and improving redundancy.
3. A detailed roadmap for the implementation of the chosen solution.
4. A list of recommended tools, technologies, and best practices for managing workload and redundancy.
5. An implementation plan, along with any necessary configuration changes to be made.
6. Performance monitoring reports with insights into KPIs such as uptime, response time, and resource utilization.
Implementation Challenges:
The major challenge faced during the implementation was the lack of a standardized infrastructure across the client′s IT landscape. With multiple servers and data centers, it was challenging to establish a unified system for managing workload distribution and creating redundancy. Additionally, there were compatibility issues with the existing applications, which required extensive testing and validation.
To overcome these challenges, our team worked closely with the client′s IT team, leveraging our expertise and industry knowledge to ensure a seamless implementation.
KPIs:
1. Uptime: The percentage of time that the applications and services are available to end-users.
2. Response time: The average time taken for a request to be processed and a response to be sent back to the user.
3. Resource utilization: The ratio of utilized resources to the total available resources, indicating the efficiency of the workload distribution.
4. Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF): The average time between application failures, predicting the system′s reliability.
5. Mean Time to Repair (MTTR): The average amount of time required to fix an application failure, indicating the system′s resilience.
Management Considerations:
Our team ensured continuous collaboration with the client′s IT team throughout the project to keep them updated on the progress and address any concerns or challenges promptly. We also conducted training sessions to upskill the client′s IT team on managing workload balancing and redundancy to ensure long-term sustainability.
Recommendations were also provided for regular performance monitoring and maintenance of the implemented solution to keep it optimized and aligned with the evolving business needs.
Conclusion:
The introduction of workload balancing and improvement in redundancy resulted in significant improvements in the client′s IT operations. The overall uptime increased by 25%, and response time reduced by 40%, leading to a better end-user experience. With efficient workload distribution and improved redundancy, the company also witnessed a 20% reduction in resource utilization, optimizing their infrastructure costs.
Citations:
1. Introduction to Workload Balancing. Plexxi, www.plexxi.com/workload-balancing-introduction/.
2. Almas, Marta. Workload Balancing and Application Redundancy Strategies for High Availability. Proceedings of the 2007 Informing Science and IT Education Joint Conference, 2007, pp. 749–756., doi:10.28945/2703.
3. Harris, Phil et al. Optimizing Load Balancing Device Configuration for Windows Server. Microsoft Corporation, 2015.
4. Loeb, Steve. The Power of Redundancy in Application Delivery. InfoWorld, InfoWorld Media Group, 6 Sept. 2007, www.infoworld.com/article/2650799/the-power-of-redundancy-in-application-delivery.html.
5. Windward Consulting Group. Workload Balancing Strategies for High Availability. 2002, www.oracle.com/us/solutions/workload-balancing-strategies-for-high-162740.pdf.
6. Competitive Clouds. State of the Art in Workload Balancing. VMware, Inc., 2020, www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/cloud/datasheet/vmware-load-balancing-ds-en-my.pdf.
Are you tired of juggling a large workload and struggling to prioritize urgent tasks? Look no further, our Workload Balancing Knowledge Base is here to save the day.
With 1534 prioritized requirements, solutions, and benefits, our dataset offers the most important questions to ask in order to achieve the best results for your team.
Our Workload Balancing solutions are specifically designed to help you manage your workload effectively, while also considering urgency and scope.
But that′s not all, our dataset also includes real-life case studies and use cases, giving you concrete examples of how our Workload Balancing techniques have led to success for other businesses.
Compared to our competitors and alternatives, our Workload Balancing Knowledge Base stands out as the top choice for professionals.
Our product is user-friendly and easy to implement, making it the perfect DIY/affordable alternative for those looking to improve their field service management without breaking the bank.
Curious about the product itself? Our Workload Balancing Knowledge Base provides a detailed overview and specification breakdown, so you know exactly what you′re getting.
It′s important to note that our product is in a league of its own, as it caters specifically to field service management professionals rather than just being a semi-related product.
But enough about us, let′s talk about the benefits to you and your business.
With our Workload Balancing Knowledge Base, you can expect increased efficiency and productivity, leading to higher customer satisfaction and ultimately, a boost in profits.
Don′t just take our word for it, extensive research has proven the effectiveness of our techniques in the field service management industry.
Worried about the cost? Our Workload Balancing Knowledge Base offers a cost-effective solution that will ultimately save you time and money in the long run.
While there may be some pros and cons to consider, we stand by our product and are confident in its ability to revolutionize your workload management.
In a nutshell, our Workload Balancing Knowledge Base is the perfect tool for businesses looking to improve their field service management.
It′s affordable, user-friendly, and most importantly, gets results.
Don′t let a heavy workload hold you back any longer, try our product today and experience the benefits firsthand.
Let us help you achieve a well-balanced workload that maximizes efficiency and success.
Order now!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1534 prioritized Workload Balancing requirements. - Extensive coverage of 127 Workload Balancing topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 127 Workload Balancing step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 127 Workload Balancing case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Performance Evaluations, Real-time Chat, Real Time Data Reporting, Schedule Optimization, Customer Feedback, Tracking Mechanisms, Cloud Computing, Capacity Planning, Field Mobility, Field Expense Management, Service Availability Management, Emergency Dispatch, Productivity Metrics, Inventory Management, Team Communication, Predictive Maintenance, Routing Optimization, Customer Service Expectations, Intelligent Routing, Workforce Analytics, Service Contracts, Inventory Tracking, Work Order Management, Larger Customers, Service Request Management, Workforce Scheduling, Augmented Reality, Remote Diagnostics, Customer Satisfaction, Quantifiable Terms, Equipment Servicing, Real Time Resource Allocation, Service Level Agreements, Compliance Audits, Equipment Downtime, Field Service Efficiency, DevOps, Service Coverage Mapping, Service Parts Management, Skillset Management, Invoice Management, Inventory Optimization, Photo Capture, Technician Training, Fault Detection, Route Optimization, Customer Self Service, Change Feedback, Inventory Replenishment, Work Order Processing, Workforce Performance, Real Time Tracking, Confrontation Management, Customer Portal, Field Configuration, Package Management, Parts Management, Billing Integration, Service Scheduling Software, Field Service, Virtual Desktop User Management, Customer Analytics, GPS Tracking, Service History Management, Safety Protocols, Electronic Forms, Responsive Service, Workload Balancing, Mobile Asset Management, Workload Forecasting, Resource Utilization, Service Asset Management, Workforce Planning, Dialogue Flow, Mobile Workforce, Field Management Software, Escalation Management, Warranty Management, Worker Management, Contract Management, Field Sales Optimization, Vehicle Tracking, Electronic Signatures, Fleet Management, Remote Time Management, Appointment Reminders, Field Service Solution, Overcome Complexity, Field Service Software, Customer Retention, Team Collaboration, Route Planning, Field Service Management, Mobile Technology, Service Desk Implementation, Customer Communication, Workforce Integration, Remote Customer Service, Resource Allocation, Field Visibility, Job Estimation, Resource Planning, Data Architecture, Service Knowledge Base, Payment Processing, Contract Renewal, Task Management, Service Alerts, Remote Assistance, Field Troubleshooting, Field Surveys, Social Media Integration, Service Discovery, Information Management, Field Workforce, Parts Ordering, Voice Recognition, Route Efficiency, Vehicle Maintenance, Asset Tracking, Workforce Management, Client Confidentiality, Scheduling Automation, Knowledge Management Culture, Field Productivity, Time Tracking, Session Management
Workload Balancing Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Workload Balancing
Workload balancing is the process of distributing work evenly across multiple systems or resources in order to optimize efficiency and prevent overloading.
1) Introducing a field service scheduling software to optimize technician workload and minimize travel time. (Efficient resource utilization)
2) Implementing a real-time dispatch system for automatic assignment of jobs based on skillset and location. (Faster response times)
3) Utilizing predictive analytics to forecast future demand and allocate resources accordingly. (Better resource allocation)
4) Enabling self-service portals for customers to schedule appointments, reducing the workload for dispatchers. (Streamlined processes)
5) Utilizing mobile workforce management tools for real-time monitoring and adjustment of technician schedules. (Improved productivity)
6) Integrating with a GPS tracking system for efficient route planning and reduced travel time. (Cost savings)
7) Providing remote access to job information for technicians, reducing the need for back-and-forth communication. (Increased efficiency)
8) Utilizing AI-powered scheduling algorithms to balance technician workload and reduce overtime costs. (Optimized work schedule)
9) Implementing a comprehensive training program for technicians to enhance their skills and handle a wider range of tasks. (Increased flexibility)
10) Utilizing dynamic scheduling techniques, such as dynamic job routing, to assign urgent tasks to available technicians. (Enhanced customer satisfaction)
CONTROL QUESTION: Do you need to improve the redundancy or introduce workload balancing into the applications?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, my big hairy audacious goal for workload balancing is to have a fully integrated and automated system in place that utilizes cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to continuously monitor and optimize our applications′ workload distribution. This system will proactively identify and balance any bottlenecks or gaps in resource usage, ensuring optimal performance and efficiency at all times.
Additionally, I aim to implement a comprehensive redundancy plan that can seamlessly handle any unexpected spikes in workload or system failures without impacting the overall user experience. This will involve incorporating robust failover mechanisms and backup systems, as well as constantly testing and refining our disaster recovery processes.
By achieving this goal, our workload balancing capabilities will be unmatched in the industry, allowing us to handle peak demands and fluctuations effortlessly while maintaining a high level of system reliability. This will not only improve our overall business operations but also bolster our reputation as a trusted and dependable provider in the market.
Customer Testimonials:
"The continuous learning capabilities of the dataset are impressive. It`s constantly adapting and improving, which ensures that my recommendations are always up-to-date."
"Five stars for this dataset! The prioritized recommendations are top-notch, and the download process was quick and hassle-free. A must-have for anyone looking to enhance their decision-making."
"This dataset is a treasure trove for those seeking effective recommendations. The prioritized suggestions are well-researched and have proven instrumental in guiding my decision-making. A great asset!"
Workload Balancing Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Synopsis:
The client, a medium-sized technology company, was facing challenges in managing their ever-increasing workload and ensuring high availability of their applications. The company′s growth over the past few years had resulted in a significant increase in their customer base, leading to a substantial rise in their workload. As a result, their applications were experiencing frequent downtimes, causing disruptions in business operations and resulting in dissatisfied customers.
Upon conducting a thorough assessment of the company′s IT infrastructure, it was evident that the client lacked an effective strategy for workload balancing and redundancy. Their existing system consisted of multiple servers and data centers hosting various applications, but there was no systematic approach in place for distributing the workload and creating redundancy across these servers.
The company approached our consulting firm with the objective of addressing these issues and improving the overall performance and resilience of their applications. The focus was on determining the most suitable solution – whether to introduce workload balancing or improve redundancy – to ensure optimum utilization of resources, mitigate the risks of downtime, and enhance the end-user experience.
Consulting Methodology:
Our team followed a structured approach to address the client′s requirements while keeping in mind industry best practices and the latest research in the field of workload balancing and redundancy. The methodology involved the following steps:
1. Assess current state: This step involved gathering information about the client′s IT infrastructure, including server and network configurations, application architecture, and performance metrics. The primary objective was to identify the key pain points and determine the root cause of the problems faced by the client.
2. Perform cost-benefit analysis: After assessing the current state, our team conducted a cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the potential impact of both options – introducing workload balancing and improving redundancy. This analysis considered factors such as implementation costs, operational costs, and the expected outcomes of each solution.
3. Determine the workload balancing requirements: Based on the information gathered in the first two steps, our team identified the specific workload balancing requirements for the client, such as traffic patterns, resource utilization, and application dependencies.
4. Develop a roadmap: The next step was to develop a detailed roadmap for implementing the chosen solution. This included defining the scope of work, identifying the necessary resources, and creating a timeline for completion.
5. Implementation: Our team worked closely with the client to implement the selected solution, ensuring minimal disruption to their operations. This involved configuring new load balancers, setting up servers in different data centers for redundancy, and establishing procedures for managing workload distribution.
6. Performance monitoring: Once the solution was implemented, our team set up a performance monitoring system to measure the impact of the changes on the client′s IT infrastructure. This helped us track key performance indicators (KPIs) and make any necessary adjustments to ensure optimal results.
Deliverables:
1. A comprehensive report highlighting our assessment of the client′s current state, including pain points and causes.
2. A cost-benefit analysis report outlining the potential costs and benefits of introducing workload balancing and improving redundancy.
3. A detailed roadmap for the implementation of the chosen solution.
4. A list of recommended tools, technologies, and best practices for managing workload and redundancy.
5. An implementation plan, along with any necessary configuration changes to be made.
6. Performance monitoring reports with insights into KPIs such as uptime, response time, and resource utilization.
Implementation Challenges:
The major challenge faced during the implementation was the lack of a standardized infrastructure across the client′s IT landscape. With multiple servers and data centers, it was challenging to establish a unified system for managing workload distribution and creating redundancy. Additionally, there were compatibility issues with the existing applications, which required extensive testing and validation.
To overcome these challenges, our team worked closely with the client′s IT team, leveraging our expertise and industry knowledge to ensure a seamless implementation.
KPIs:
1. Uptime: The percentage of time that the applications and services are available to end-users.
2. Response time: The average time taken for a request to be processed and a response to be sent back to the user.
3. Resource utilization: The ratio of utilized resources to the total available resources, indicating the efficiency of the workload distribution.
4. Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF): The average time between application failures, predicting the system′s reliability.
5. Mean Time to Repair (MTTR): The average amount of time required to fix an application failure, indicating the system′s resilience.
Management Considerations:
Our team ensured continuous collaboration with the client′s IT team throughout the project to keep them updated on the progress and address any concerns or challenges promptly. We also conducted training sessions to upskill the client′s IT team on managing workload balancing and redundancy to ensure long-term sustainability.
Recommendations were also provided for regular performance monitoring and maintenance of the implemented solution to keep it optimized and aligned with the evolving business needs.
Conclusion:
The introduction of workload balancing and improvement in redundancy resulted in significant improvements in the client′s IT operations. The overall uptime increased by 25%, and response time reduced by 40%, leading to a better end-user experience. With efficient workload distribution and improved redundancy, the company also witnessed a 20% reduction in resource utilization, optimizing their infrastructure costs.
Citations:
1. Introduction to Workload Balancing. Plexxi, www.plexxi.com/workload-balancing-introduction/.
2. Almas, Marta. Workload Balancing and Application Redundancy Strategies for High Availability. Proceedings of the 2007 Informing Science and IT Education Joint Conference, 2007, pp. 749–756., doi:10.28945/2703.
3. Harris, Phil et al. Optimizing Load Balancing Device Configuration for Windows Server. Microsoft Corporation, 2015.
4. Loeb, Steve. The Power of Redundancy in Application Delivery. InfoWorld, InfoWorld Media Group, 6 Sept. 2007, www.infoworld.com/article/2650799/the-power-of-redundancy-in-application-delivery.html.
5. Windward Consulting Group. Workload Balancing Strategies for High Availability. 2002, www.oracle.com/us/solutions/workload-balancing-strategies-for-high-162740.pdf.
6. Competitive Clouds. State of the Art in Workload Balancing. VMware, Inc., 2020, www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/cloud/datasheet/vmware-load-balancing-ds-en-my.pdf.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
