Attention all security professionals, are you looking for a comprehensive and efficient solution to improve your organization′s integrity baseline and attack surface reduction? Look no further!
Introducing our one-of-a-kind Integrity Baseline and Attack Surface Reduction Knowledge Base.
This specialized dataset contains 1567 prioritized requirements, effective solutions, and tangible results, making it the most complete and practical resource in the market.
It is specifically designed for urgent and critical security needs, allowing you to prioritize and address any potential threats quickly and effectively.
But that′s not all.
Our knowledge base also includes real-life case studies and use cases, providing you with concrete examples and actionable insights to implement in your own organization.
Compared to other products and alternatives, our Integrity Baseline and Attack Surface Reduction dataset surpasses them all in terms of comprehensiveness and efficiency.
It is specifically tailored for professionals like you, making it the go-to tool for any security expert.
Our product is easy to use and suitable for DIY projects, which means you don′t need to hire expensive consultants or invest in complicated software.
Simply access the dataset, and you will have all the information you need at your fingertips.
From cost-effectiveness to convenience, our product offers numerous benefits for your organization.
With the help of our knowledge base, you can conduct thorough research on integrity baseline and attack surface reduction, ensuring that your organization is always ahead of potential cyber threats.
Not only is our product perfect for businesses, but it is also budget-friendly, making it accessible for organizations of any size.
Plus, our knowledge base provides you with both pros and cons, giving you a holistic understanding of each requirement and solution.
So, what are you waiting for? Upgrade your organization′s security measures today with our Integrity Baseline and Attack Surface Reduction Knowledge Base.
Say goodbye to guesswork and hello to tangible results.
With our comprehensive dataset, you can rest assured that your organization′s integrity is in safe hands.
Order now and experience the difference in your security measures!
Can the operator use risk assessment data to defend longer intervals between integrity assessments? What does the process look like of establishing baseline data and determining its integrity? Has the operator adequately implemented its remediation process and procedures to effectively remediate conditions identified through integrity assessments or information analysis?
Integrity Baseline
No, the integrity baseline is the minimum frequency for assessments and cannot be extended without strong justification.
Solutions:
1. Implement automated security updates: Provides regular patches to maintain integrity without manual intervention, reducing the risk of attacks.
2. Utilize intrusion detection systems: Can detect and alert on potential integrity issues, allowing for quicker response to threats.
3. Conduct regular security audits: Helps identify any vulnerabilities or areas of weakness that could compromise integrity.
4. Implement access controls: Limits who can make changes to the system, reducing the risk of unauthorized alterations.
5. Establish a backup and recovery plan: In case of a successful attack on integrity, having backups allows for a quick recovery with minimal impact.
6. Train employees on safe practices: Educating employees on security best practices can prevent unintentional damage to integrity.
Benefits:
1. Increased protection against attacks: Regular updates and monitoring can prevent attackers from exploiting known vulnerabilities.
2. Quicker response to threats: Intrusion detection systems can alert operators to potential integrity issues, allowing for a faster response.
3. Reduced risk of data loss: Regular backups and a recovery plan can limit the impact of a successful attack on integrity.
4. Minimized human error: Access controls and employee training can prevent unintentional changes to the system that could compromise integrity.
5. Compliance with regulations: Regular security audits and measures to maintain integrity can help meet regulatory requirements.
6. Cost savings: Preventing attacks and minimizing downtime can save on costs associated with recovering from an integrity breach.
CONTROL QUESTION: Can the operator use risk assessment data to defend longer intervals between integrity assessments?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, Integrity Baseline aims to revolutionize the oil and gas industry by successfully demonstrating and implementing the use of risk assessment data to justify longer intervals between integrity assessments. Through continued research, development, and collaboration with industry experts, we will establish a robust and reliable methodology for determining the appropriate frequency of integrity assessments based on risk factors specific to each asset.
Our goal is to empower operators to confidently extend time intervals between inspections without compromising safety or regulatory requirements. By utilizing advanced technology and data-driven analysis, we will enable operators to optimize their inspection schedules, reducing costs and minimizing downtime without sacrificing the integrity of their assets.
We envision a future where the traditional annual or biennial inspection cycle is replaced by a proactive and dynamic maintenance schedule that is tailored to the unique needs of each asset. This will not only save the industry billions of dollars in unnecessary inspection costs but also enhance operational efficiency and minimize environmental impact.
Furthermore, our success in this audacious goal will set a new standard for integrity management and pave the way for a more sustainable and efficient energy sector. We are committed to pushing the boundaries and continuously pushing for innovation and excellence in integrity management, ultimately creating a safer and more resilient industry for the future.
"This dataset sparked my creativity and led me to develop new and innovative product recommendations that my customers love. It`s opened up a whole new revenue stream for my business."
Case Study: Using Risk Assessment Data to Defend Longer Intervals between Integrity Assessments for an Offshore Oil and Gas Operator
Synopsis of Client Situation:
Integrity Baseline is a leading offshore oil and gas operator that operates in the Gulf of Mexico region. The company has a large portfolio of assets that require regular integrity assessments to ensure safe and efficient operations. As per regulatory requirements, Integrity Baseline conducts regular integrity assessments on its assets using inspection, testing, and monitoring techniques. These assessments play a critical role in identifying potential risks and preventing any incidents that could lead to catastrophic consequences.
However, due to the high number of assets and the challenging offshore environment, conducting integrity assessments can be a time-consuming and costly process for Integrity Baseline. The company is constantly looking for ways to optimize its integrity assessment process without compromising safety or regulatory compliance. One of the potential solutions for this is to extend the intervals between integrity assessments, as long as it can be justified through risk assessment data.
Consulting Methodology:
To help Integrity Baseline determine whether it is feasible to defend longer intervals between integrity assessments, our consulting team used a three-phase methodology:
1. Data Collection and Analysis: In this phase, we collected and analyzed Integrity Baseline′s existing risk assessment data, including past integrity assessment reports, maintenance logs, incident reports, and other relevant documentation. We also conducted interviews with key personnel involved in the integrity assessment process to gain a better understanding of their methods and procedures.
2. Risk Assessment and Mitigation Planning: Based on the data collected and analyzed in the first phase, our team conducted a comprehensive risk assessment to identify potential hazards and quantify the level of risk associated with each asset. This helped us prioritize the assets and determine which ones required more frequent integrity assessments and which ones could potentially have longer intervals between assessments.
3. Cost-Benefit Analysis and Implementation Plan: In the final phase, we used the results of the risk assessment and mitigation planning to conduct a cost-benefit analysis. This involved estimating the potential cost savings of extending intervals between assessments and balancing them against the risks associated with longer intervals. Based on this analysis, we developed an implementation plan that outlined the changes needed in procedures, equipment, and personnel to safely defend longer intervals between integrity assessments.
Deliverables:
Our consulting team delivered the following key deliverables to Integrity Baseline:
1. A comprehensive risk assessment report, including a list of assets prioritized based on their level of risk.
2. A risk mitigation plan that included mitigation measures for higher-risk assets and a justification for longer intervals between assessments for lower-risk assets.
3. A cost-benefit analysis report outlining the potential cost savings and risks associated with extending intervals between assessments.
4. An implementation plan that detailed the necessary changes and procedures to defend longer intervals between integrity assessments.
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of longer intervals between integrity assessments presented several challenges that needed to be addressed:
1. Regulatory Compliance: Integrity Baseline had to ensure that the extended intervals between assessments did not violate any regulatory requirements.
2. Asset Integrity: The company had to ensure that the assets remained safe and fit for purpose throughout the extended intervals between assessments.
3. Change Management: Implementing longer intervals between assessments required changes in procedures and personnel roles, and this had to be managed effectively to avoid any disruptions or resistance from employees.
KPIs and Other Management Considerations:
To measure the success of our methodology, we suggested using the following key performance indicators (KPIs):
1. Cost Savings: The primary goal of extending intervals between assessments is to achieve cost savings. Therefore, tracking the actual cost savings achieved compared to the estimated savings would be an important KPI.
2. Operational Efficiency: Implementing longer intervals between assessments should not affect the operational efficiency of the assets. Measuring the impact on asset availability and downtime would help track this KPI.
3. Regulatory Compliance: Ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements is crucial for any offshore operator. Tracking any violations or non-compliance related to extended intervals between assessments would help measure the effectiveness of the implementation.
Management must also consider the potential risks and rewards associated with extending intervals between assessments, including the potential for cost savings, potential for increased risk, and potential impact on overall asset integrity.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, our consulting team was able to help Integrity Baseline determine whether they could defend longer intervals between integrity assessments using risk assessment data. By conducting a comprehensive risk assessment, developing a risk mitigation plan, and analyzing cost-benefit considerations, we were able to identify which assets could have longer intervals between assessments and develop an implementation plan for this change. The success of this approach will ultimately be measured by the KPIs mentioned above, and management must carefully monitor the implementation to ensure safety, regulatory compliance, and cost savings are achieved.
Introducing our one-of-a-kind Integrity Baseline and Attack Surface Reduction Knowledge Base.
This specialized dataset contains 1567 prioritized requirements, effective solutions, and tangible results, making it the most complete and practical resource in the market.
It is specifically designed for urgent and critical security needs, allowing you to prioritize and address any potential threats quickly and effectively.
But that′s not all.
Our knowledge base also includes real-life case studies and use cases, providing you with concrete examples and actionable insights to implement in your own organization.
Compared to other products and alternatives, our Integrity Baseline and Attack Surface Reduction dataset surpasses them all in terms of comprehensiveness and efficiency.
It is specifically tailored for professionals like you, making it the go-to tool for any security expert.
Our product is easy to use and suitable for DIY projects, which means you don′t need to hire expensive consultants or invest in complicated software.
Simply access the dataset, and you will have all the information you need at your fingertips.
From cost-effectiveness to convenience, our product offers numerous benefits for your organization.
With the help of our knowledge base, you can conduct thorough research on integrity baseline and attack surface reduction, ensuring that your organization is always ahead of potential cyber threats.
Not only is our product perfect for businesses, but it is also budget-friendly, making it accessible for organizations of any size.
Plus, our knowledge base provides you with both pros and cons, giving you a holistic understanding of each requirement and solution.
So, what are you waiting for? Upgrade your organization′s security measures today with our Integrity Baseline and Attack Surface Reduction Knowledge Base.
Say goodbye to guesswork and hello to tangible results.
With our comprehensive dataset, you can rest assured that your organization′s integrity is in safe hands.
Order now and experience the difference in your security measures!
Discover Insights, Make Informed Decisions, and Stay Ahead of the Curve:
Key Features:
Comprehensive set of 1567 prioritized Integrity Baseline requirements. - Extensive coverage of 187 Integrity Baseline topic scopes.
- In-depth analysis of 187 Integrity Baseline step-by-step solutions, benefits, BHAGs.
- Detailed examination of 187 Integrity Baseline case studies and use cases.
- Digital download upon purchase.
- Enjoy lifetime document updates included with your purchase.
- Benefit from a fully editable and customizable Excel format.
- Trusted and utilized by over 10,000 organizations.
- Covering: Wireless Security Network Encryption, System Lockdown, Phishing Protection, System Activity Logs, Incident Response Coverage, Business Continuity, Incident Response Planning, Testing Process, Coverage Analysis, Account Lockout, Compliance Assessment, Intrusion Detection System, Patch Management Patch Prioritization, Media Disposal, Unsanctioned Devices, Cloud Services, Communication Protocols, Single Sign On, Test Documentation, Code Analysis, Mobile Device Management Security Policies, Asset Management Inventory Tracking, Cloud Access Security Broker Cloud Application Control, Network Access Control Network Authentication, Restore Point, Patch Management, Flat Network, User Behavior Analysis, Contractual Obligations, Security Audit Auditing Tools, Security Auditing Policy Compliance, Demilitarized Zone, Access Requests, Extraction Controls, Log Analysis, Least Privilege Access, Access Controls, Behavioral Analysis, Disaster Recovery Plan Disaster Response, Anomaly Detection, Backup Scheduling, Password Policies Password Complexity, Off Site Storage, Device Hardening System Hardening, Browser Security, Honeypot Deployment, Threat Modeling, User Consent, Mobile Security Device Management, Data Anonymization, Session Recording, Audits And Assessments, Audit Logs, Regulatory Compliance Reporting, Access Revocation, User Provisioning, Mobile Device Encryption, Endpoint Protection Malware Prevention, Vulnerability Management Risk Assessment, Vulnerability Scanning, Secure Channels, Risk Assessment Framework, Forensics Investigation, Self Service Password Reset, Security Incident Response Incident Handling, Change Default Credentials, Data Expiration Policies, Change Approval Policies, Data At Rest Encryption, Firewall Configuration, Intrusion Detection, Emergency Patches, Attack Surface, Database Security Data Encryption, Privacy Impact Assessment, Security Awareness Phishing Simulation, Privileged Access Management, Production Deployment, Plan Testing, Malware Protection Antivirus, Secure Protocols, Privacy Data Protection Regulation, Identity Management Authentication Processes, Incident Response Response Plan, Network Monitoring Traffic Analysis, Documentation Updates, Network Segmentation Policies, Web Filtering Content Filtering, Attack Surface Reduction, Asset Value Classification, Biometric Authentication, Secure Development Security Training, Disaster Recovery Readiness, Risk Evaluation, Forgot Password Process, VM Isolation, Disposal Procedures, Compliance Regulatory Standards, Data Classification Data Labeling, Password Management Password Storage, Privacy By Design, Rollback Procedure, Cybersecurity Training, Recovery Procedures, Integrity Baseline, Third Party Security Vendor Risk Assessment, Business Continuity Recovery Objectives, Screen Sharing, Data Encryption, Anti Malware, Rogue Access Point Detection, Access Management Identity Verification, Information Protection Tips, Application Security Code Reviews, Host Intrusion Prevention, Disaster Recovery Plan, Attack Mitigation, Real Time Threat Detection, Security Controls Review, Threat Intelligence Threat Feeds, Cyber Insurance Risk Assessment, Cloud Security Data Encryption, Virtualization Security Hypervisor Security, Web Application Firewall, Backup And Recovery Disaster Recovery, Social Engineering, Security Analytics Data Visualization, Network Segmentation Rules, Endpoint Detection And Response, Web Access Control, Password Expiration, Shadow IT Discovery, Role Based Access, Remote Desktop Control, Change Management Change Approval Process, Security Requirements, Audit Trail Review, Change Tracking System, Risk Management Risk Mitigation Strategies, Packet Filtering, System Logs, Data Privacy Data Protection Policies, Data Exfiltration, Backup Frequency, Data Backup Data Retention, Multi Factor Authentication, Data Sensitivity Assessment, Network Segmentation Micro Segmentation, Physical Security Video Surveillance, Segmentation Policies, Policy Enforcement, Impact Analysis, User Awareness Security Training, Shadow IT Control, Dark Web Monitoring, Firewall Rules Rule Review, Data Loss Prevention, Disaster Recovery Backup Solutions, Real Time Alerts, Encryption Encryption Key Management, Behavioral Analytics, Access Controls Least Privilege, Vulnerability Testing, Cloud Backup Cloud Storage, Monitoring Tools, Patch Deployment, Secure Storage, Password Policies, Real Time Protection, Complexity Reduction, Application Control, System Recovery, Input Validation, Access Point Security, App Permissions, Deny By Default, Vulnerability Detection, Change Control Change Management Process, Continuous Risk Monitoring, Endpoint Compliance, Crisis Communication, Role Based Authorization, Incremental Backups, Risk Assessment Threat Analysis, Remote Wipe, Penetration Testing, Automated Updates
Integrity Baseline Assessment Dataset - Utilization, Solutions, Advantages, BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal):
Integrity Baseline
No, the integrity baseline is the minimum frequency for assessments and cannot be extended without strong justification.
Solutions:
1. Implement automated security updates: Provides regular patches to maintain integrity without manual intervention, reducing the risk of attacks.
2. Utilize intrusion detection systems: Can detect and alert on potential integrity issues, allowing for quicker response to threats.
3. Conduct regular security audits: Helps identify any vulnerabilities or areas of weakness that could compromise integrity.
4. Implement access controls: Limits who can make changes to the system, reducing the risk of unauthorized alterations.
5. Establish a backup and recovery plan: In case of a successful attack on integrity, having backups allows for a quick recovery with minimal impact.
6. Train employees on safe practices: Educating employees on security best practices can prevent unintentional damage to integrity.
Benefits:
1. Increased protection against attacks: Regular updates and monitoring can prevent attackers from exploiting known vulnerabilities.
2. Quicker response to threats: Intrusion detection systems can alert operators to potential integrity issues, allowing for a faster response.
3. Reduced risk of data loss: Regular backups and a recovery plan can limit the impact of a successful attack on integrity.
4. Minimized human error: Access controls and employee training can prevent unintentional changes to the system that could compromise integrity.
5. Compliance with regulations: Regular security audits and measures to maintain integrity can help meet regulatory requirements.
6. Cost savings: Preventing attacks and minimizing downtime can save on costs associated with recovering from an integrity breach.
CONTROL QUESTION: Can the operator use risk assessment data to defend longer intervals between integrity assessments?
Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) for 10 years from now:
In 10 years, Integrity Baseline aims to revolutionize the oil and gas industry by successfully demonstrating and implementing the use of risk assessment data to justify longer intervals between integrity assessments. Through continued research, development, and collaboration with industry experts, we will establish a robust and reliable methodology for determining the appropriate frequency of integrity assessments based on risk factors specific to each asset.
Our goal is to empower operators to confidently extend time intervals between inspections without compromising safety or regulatory requirements. By utilizing advanced technology and data-driven analysis, we will enable operators to optimize their inspection schedules, reducing costs and minimizing downtime without sacrificing the integrity of their assets.
We envision a future where the traditional annual or biennial inspection cycle is replaced by a proactive and dynamic maintenance schedule that is tailored to the unique needs of each asset. This will not only save the industry billions of dollars in unnecessary inspection costs but also enhance operational efficiency and minimize environmental impact.
Furthermore, our success in this audacious goal will set a new standard for integrity management and pave the way for a more sustainable and efficient energy sector. We are committed to pushing the boundaries and continuously pushing for innovation and excellence in integrity management, ultimately creating a safer and more resilient industry for the future.
Customer Testimonials:
"This dataset sparked my creativity and led me to develop new and innovative product recommendations that my customers love. It`s opened up a whole new revenue stream for my business."
"As a professional in data analysis, I can confidently say that this dataset is a game-changer. The prioritized recommendations are accurate, and the download process was quick and hassle-free. Bravo!"
"I can`t express how pleased I am with this dataset. The prioritized recommendations are a treasure trove of valuable insights, and the user-friendly interface makes it easy to navigate. Highly recommended!"
Integrity Baseline Case Study/Use Case example - How to use:
Case Study: Using Risk Assessment Data to Defend Longer Intervals between Integrity Assessments for an Offshore Oil and Gas Operator
Synopsis of Client Situation:
Integrity Baseline is a leading offshore oil and gas operator that operates in the Gulf of Mexico region. The company has a large portfolio of assets that require regular integrity assessments to ensure safe and efficient operations. As per regulatory requirements, Integrity Baseline conducts regular integrity assessments on its assets using inspection, testing, and monitoring techniques. These assessments play a critical role in identifying potential risks and preventing any incidents that could lead to catastrophic consequences.
However, due to the high number of assets and the challenging offshore environment, conducting integrity assessments can be a time-consuming and costly process for Integrity Baseline. The company is constantly looking for ways to optimize its integrity assessment process without compromising safety or regulatory compliance. One of the potential solutions for this is to extend the intervals between integrity assessments, as long as it can be justified through risk assessment data.
Consulting Methodology:
To help Integrity Baseline determine whether it is feasible to defend longer intervals between integrity assessments, our consulting team used a three-phase methodology:
1. Data Collection and Analysis: In this phase, we collected and analyzed Integrity Baseline′s existing risk assessment data, including past integrity assessment reports, maintenance logs, incident reports, and other relevant documentation. We also conducted interviews with key personnel involved in the integrity assessment process to gain a better understanding of their methods and procedures.
2. Risk Assessment and Mitigation Planning: Based on the data collected and analyzed in the first phase, our team conducted a comprehensive risk assessment to identify potential hazards and quantify the level of risk associated with each asset. This helped us prioritize the assets and determine which ones required more frequent integrity assessments and which ones could potentially have longer intervals between assessments.
3. Cost-Benefit Analysis and Implementation Plan: In the final phase, we used the results of the risk assessment and mitigation planning to conduct a cost-benefit analysis. This involved estimating the potential cost savings of extending intervals between assessments and balancing them against the risks associated with longer intervals. Based on this analysis, we developed an implementation plan that outlined the changes needed in procedures, equipment, and personnel to safely defend longer intervals between integrity assessments.
Deliverables:
Our consulting team delivered the following key deliverables to Integrity Baseline:
1. A comprehensive risk assessment report, including a list of assets prioritized based on their level of risk.
2. A risk mitigation plan that included mitigation measures for higher-risk assets and a justification for longer intervals between assessments for lower-risk assets.
3. A cost-benefit analysis report outlining the potential cost savings and risks associated with extending intervals between assessments.
4. An implementation plan that detailed the necessary changes and procedures to defend longer intervals between integrity assessments.
Implementation Challenges:
The implementation of longer intervals between integrity assessments presented several challenges that needed to be addressed:
1. Regulatory Compliance: Integrity Baseline had to ensure that the extended intervals between assessments did not violate any regulatory requirements.
2. Asset Integrity: The company had to ensure that the assets remained safe and fit for purpose throughout the extended intervals between assessments.
3. Change Management: Implementing longer intervals between assessments required changes in procedures and personnel roles, and this had to be managed effectively to avoid any disruptions or resistance from employees.
KPIs and Other Management Considerations:
To measure the success of our methodology, we suggested using the following key performance indicators (KPIs):
1. Cost Savings: The primary goal of extending intervals between assessments is to achieve cost savings. Therefore, tracking the actual cost savings achieved compared to the estimated savings would be an important KPI.
2. Operational Efficiency: Implementing longer intervals between assessments should not affect the operational efficiency of the assets. Measuring the impact on asset availability and downtime would help track this KPI.
3. Regulatory Compliance: Ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements is crucial for any offshore operator. Tracking any violations or non-compliance related to extended intervals between assessments would help measure the effectiveness of the implementation.
Management must also consider the potential risks and rewards associated with extending intervals between assessments, including the potential for cost savings, potential for increased risk, and potential impact on overall asset integrity.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, our consulting team was able to help Integrity Baseline determine whether they could defend longer intervals between integrity assessments using risk assessment data. By conducting a comprehensive risk assessment, developing a risk mitigation plan, and analyzing cost-benefit considerations, we were able to identify which assets could have longer intervals between assessments and develop an implementation plan for this change. The success of this approach will ultimately be measured by the KPIs mentioned above, and management must carefully monitor the implementation to ensure safety, regulatory compliance, and cost savings are achieved.
Security and Trust:
- Secure checkout with SSL encryption Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, Paypal
- Money-back guarantee for 30 days
- Our team is available 24/7 to assist you - support@theartofservice.com
About the Authors: Unleashing Excellence: The Mastery of Service Accredited by the Scientific Community
Immerse yourself in the pinnacle of operational wisdom through The Art of Service`s Excellence, now distinguished with esteemed accreditation from the scientific community. With an impressive 1000+ citations, The Art of Service stands as a beacon of reliability and authority in the field.Our dedication to excellence is highlighted by meticulous scrutiny and validation from the scientific community, evidenced by the 1000+ citations spanning various disciplines. Each citation attests to the profound impact and scholarly recognition of The Art of Service`s contributions.
Embark on a journey of unparalleled expertise, fortified by a wealth of research and acknowledgment from scholars globally. Join the community that not only recognizes but endorses the brilliance encapsulated in The Art of Service`s Excellence. Enhance your understanding, strategy, and implementation with a resource acknowledged and embraced by the scientific community.
Embrace excellence. Embrace The Art of Service.
Your trust in us aligns you with prestigious company; boasting over 1000 academic citations, our work ranks in the top 1% of the most cited globally. Explore our scholarly contributions at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=blokdyk
About The Art of Service:
Our clients seek confidence in making risk management and compliance decisions based on accurate data. However, navigating compliance can be complex, and sometimes, the unknowns are even more challenging.
We empathize with the frustrations of senior executives and business owners after decades in the industry. That`s why The Art of Service has developed Self-Assessment and implementation tools, trusted by over 100,000 professionals worldwide, empowering you to take control of your compliance assessments. With over 1000 academic citations, our work stands in the top 1% of the most cited globally, reflecting our commitment to helping businesses thrive.
Founders:
Gerard Blokdyk
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerardblokdijk/
Ivanka Menken
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivankamenken/
